fix: misleading javascript conflict example

[NemoZon]

Description

explain why the function is not overwritten

Motivation

working on Issue #37549

Additional details

Related issues and pull requests

Fixes #37549

[github-actions]

Preview URLs

• /en-US/docs/Learn_web_development/Core/Scripting/Functions

Flaws (251)

URL: /en-US/docs/Learn_web_development/Core/Scripting/Functions
Title: Functions — reusable blocks of code
Flaw count: 251

• macros:
  • Wrong xref macro used (consider changing which macro you use). Error processing path /en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web
  • Wrong xref macro used (consider changing which macro you use). Error processing path /en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/Installing_basic_software
  • Wrong xref macro used (consider changing which macro you use). Error processing path /en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/What_will_your_website_look_like
  • Wrong xref macro used (consider changing which macro you use). Error processing path /en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/Dealing_with_files
  • Wrong xref macro used (consider changing which macro you use). Error processing path /en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/HTML_basics
  • and 246 more flaws omitted

(comment last updated: 2025-01-17 19:43:12)

[NemoZon]

I hope this description will be sufficient, but if not, please let me know.

[Josh-Cena]

I do have some suggestion for rewording, but I decided to just commit that to your branch. I mainly just added another paragraph saying what should happen if just the function gets redeclared. Thanks!