Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GH-167][GH-215] Removed "Beta" label on Account-Level app, and updated documentation #328

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

raghavaggarwal2308
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  1. Added the latest screenshot.
  2. Completed the documentation for plugin configuration.

Screenshot:

image

Ticket Link

Fixes #167
Fixes #215

1. Added latest screenshot
2. Completed the documentation for plugin configuration.
@cwarnermm cwarnermm added the 2: Dev Review Requires review by a core committer label Nov 29, 2023
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated
* Connect your users to Zoom using OAuth.
* Use the Client ID and Client Secret generated when configuring Zoom to fill in the fields **Zoom OAuth Client ID** and **Zoom OAuth Client Secret**.
* Use the Client ID and Client Secret generated when configuring Zoom to fill in the fields **Zoom OAuth Client ID** and **Zoom OAuth Client Secret**. (Make sure these credentials are according to the app type (user/account level) you are using.)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How might someone know the difference between the necessary credentials on the different app types?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mickmister By this line I meant that if the user has selected the app type as "Account level app". He should make sure that he is using a account level app on Zoom side as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should just say the sentence that you used above to explain the point. If the "credentials" don't change between the two app types, then the current sentence could be misleading

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mickmister Fixed

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mickmister
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, just a few suggestions

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (eff609c) 19.33% compared to head (2be2060) 19.33%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #328   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   19.33%   19.33%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        1479     1479           
=======================================
  Hits          286      286           
  Misses       1138     1138           
  Partials       55       55           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@mickmister mickmister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one grammatical suggestion

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Michael Kochell <[email protected]>
@raghavaggarwal2308
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mickmister Fixed

@mickmister mickmister changed the title [GH-167][GH-215] Updated documentation [GH-167][GH-215] Removed "Beta" label on Account-Level app, and updated documentation Dec 4, 2023
@mickmister mickmister merged commit 7f468cb into mattermost:master Dec 4, 2023
9 checks passed
@raghavaggarwal2308 raghavaggarwal2308 deleted the MM-167,215 branch December 5, 2023 08:47
@avas27JTG avas27JTG mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2: Dev Review Requires review by a core committer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document steps to authorize "Account Level App" Add screenshot to the README
3 participants