Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_scheduler: remove the exact ordering assertion #2484

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
+9 −120
Closed

test_scheduler: remove the exact ordering assertion #2484

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
129 changes: 9 additions & 120 deletions artiq/test/test_scheduler.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -141,132 +141,21 @@ def test_pending_priority(self):
high_priority = 3
middle_priority = 2
low_priority = 1
# The time used by "high_priority" experiment is far enough into the future, beyond reasonable test timeout.
# Thus if the "middle_priority" experiment is scheduled after "high_priority" experiment, then it would be completed, thus failing the test.
late = time() + 100000
LEXUGE marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
early = time() + 1

expect = [
{
"path": [],
"action": "setitem",
"value": {
"repo_msg": None,
"priority": low_priority,
"pipeline": "main",
"due_date": None,
"status": "pending",
"expid": expid_bg,
"flush": False
},
"key": 0
},
{
"path": [],
"action": "setitem",
"value": {
"repo_msg": None,
"priority": high_priority,
"pipeline": "main",
"due_date": late,
"status": "pending",
"expid": expid_empty,
"flush": False
},
"key": 1
},
{
"path": [],
"action": "setitem",
"value": {
"repo_msg": None,
"priority": middle_priority,
"pipeline": "main",
"due_date": early,
"status": "pending",
"expid": expid_empty,
"flush": False
},
"key": 2
},
{
"path": [0],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "preparing",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [0],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "prepare_done",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [0],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "running",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "preparing",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "prepare_done",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [0],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "paused",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "running",
"key": "status"
},
{
middle_priority_done = asyncio.Event()
def notify(mod):
# Watch for the "middle_priority" experiment's completion
if mod == {
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "run_done",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [0],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "running",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "analyzing",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [2],
"action": "setitem",
"value": "deleting",
"key": "status"
},
{
"path": [],
"action": "delitem",
"key": 2
},
]
done = asyncio.Event()
expect_idx = 0
def notify(mod):
nonlocal expect_idx
self.assertEqual(mod, expect[expect_idx])
expect_idx += 1
if expect_idx >= len(expect):
done.set()
}:
middle_priority_done.set()
scheduler.notifier.publish = notify

scheduler.start(loop=loop)
Expand All @@ -275,7 +164,7 @@ def notify(mod):
scheduler.submit("main", expid_empty, high_priority, late)
scheduler.submit("main", expid_empty, middle_priority, early)

loop.run_until_complete(done.wait())
loop.run_until_complete(middle_priority_done.wait())
LEXUGE marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
scheduler.notifier.publish = None
loop.run_until_complete(scheduler.stop())

Expand Down