Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative #200

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#431

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#431
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 逻辑判断

    • CheckDelegate.qmlItemDelegate.qml中,visibleactive属性的条件判断中新增了!D.DTK.hasAnimationcontrol.hovered。这些条件是否合理需要根据具体业务逻辑来决定。如果这些条件是必要的,那么代码是合理的;如果不是,那么可能需要重新评估这些条件的必要性。
  2. 代码可读性

    • 新增的条件判断可能会降低代码的可读性,建议添加注释来解释为什么需要这些条件,以便其他开发者理解。
  3. 性能考虑

    • 如果D.DTK.hasAnimationcontrol.hovered的值在频繁变化,可能会影响性能。如果这些属性的变化不频繁,那么可以忽略这一点;否则,可能需要考虑优化这些属性的获取方式。
  4. 安全性

    • 代码中没有涉及到安全性问题,不需要额外的安全审查。
  5. 一致性

    • 确保在所有相关的QML文件中,对D.DTK.hasAnimationcontrol.hovered的使用是一致的,以保持代码的一致性和可维护性。
  6. 测试

    • 由于代码的改动可能影响UI的显示和行为,建议进行充分的测试,确保这些改动不会引入新的问题。

综上所述,代码的改动看起来是为了增加一些额外的逻辑判断,但是需要确保这些改动是必要的,并且不会对性能产生负面影响。同时,建议添加注释以提高代码的可读性,并确保代码的一致性和可维护性。

@FeiWang1119 FeiWang1119 merged commit 31e0088 into master Dec 13, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@FeiWang1119 FeiWang1119 deleted the sync-pr-431-nosync branch December 13, 2024 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants