Transparency example (PR only) #804
Draft
+241
−580
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace with blitting/surface utilities in the `utils` module.
DJMcNab
force-pushed
the
transparency
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2036ac9 to
ae54187
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Demonstration of how you'd get transparency with #803.
I'm not planning to merge this, because I don't think that this should be part of
utils. However, I'm happy for someone to want to make the follow-up of making this configurable (cc @TheNachoBIT), if they still want to useutilsand have a transparent surface render. OTOH, #801 is for a different use case, which I would argue should just use a customTextureBlitter.