-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PROCESS CHANGE: Dissolving TradeMark Commitee #1399
Comments
I don't recall this being discussed at any TOC meeting. In my mind |
Does it make sense to split point 2 as
|
Agree with @xtreme-sameer-vohra maybe splitting in two is the answer. |
@nainaz asked me to vote , and I am unclear how to do that other than adding a comment that i am OK with dissolving today TM committee and continuing the conformance work via the TOC, as proposed above by @xtreme-sameer-vohra |
Hey @nainaz |
Thank you @smoser-ibm and @xtreme-sameer-vohra |
SC's and my understanding is that we can dissolve the TM committee now and transfer the responsibilities to SC and TOC, as written above. My idea of proceeding is:
Does this make sense? |
Related #1161 |
We discussed this with @jberkus and the way above seems reasonable |
As we are part of CNCF we no longer need Trademark Committee.
Current charter for Trademark commitee is as following:
At SC and TOC we believe that Conformance should and can be handled by TOC (point 2) and point 1 and 4 are no longer needed. SC will handle brand use guidelines (point 3).
Since only TM can redefine its own charter, membership and authority.
Please let us know your thoughts and wishes.
Proposed
P.S: No meeting has happened since Feb 2023 due to no quorum.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: