Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev: Add a method of comparison #124

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

delong45
Copy link

Add a method of comparison like historical. It's more suitable for something periodic, only used in graphite. I think it's useful in actual work.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.07%) to 60.706% when pulling 142b00d on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 60.78% when pulling 8238664 on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 60.78% when pulling f033eb0 on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 60.78% when pulling 475b8e4 on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.6%) to 60.216% when pulling 82839df on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.6%) to 60.216% when pulling f183bc6 on delong45:dev into 20a9fb1 on klen:develop.

@garrettheel
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution! Is there a reason why you wouldn't just write a query which contains the timeShift() graphite function?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants