Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explain model selection in the readme, fix missing model selection argument in generate_embeddings_batch #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

kdunee
Copy link
Owner

@kdunee kdunee commented Oct 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the README.md to include a "Model Selection" section, allowing users to specify different AI models for question generation.
  • Enhancements

    • Enhanced functionality for specifying an embedding model in the question generation process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the README.md file and the generate_embeddings_batch.py script within the QuizGen project. In the README.md, a new section titled "Model Selection" has been added, detailing the specification of different AI models for question generation, including three model selection arguments: --concept-model, --questions-model, and --embedding-model. This section provides examples of how to use these arguments with the generate and embeddings commands. Additionally, a new section called "Example Anki Decks" has been introduced, showcasing specific Anki decks generated by QuizGen, complete with download links. The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, retaining sections on key features, installation, workflow, usage, contributing, and licensing.

In the src/quizgen/scripts/generate_embeddings_batch.py file, the generate_embeddings function has been modified to include a new parameter, embedding_model, which allows users to specify the model for generating embeddings. Corresponding updates have been made to the argument parser in the main function to accommodate this new parameter, enhancing the script's functionality.

Possibly related PRs

  • add golang deck #6: Updates to the README.md file for the QuizGen project include enhancements to the "Example Anki Decks" section, which is relevant to the new section added in this PR that discusses examples of generated Anki decks.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/quizgen/scripts/generate_embeddings_batch.py (2)

37-38: LGTM: Embedding model parameter correctly passed to the script.

The addition of the --embedding-model argument in the subprocess.run call ensures that the selected embedding model is correctly passed to the generate_embeddings.py script. This change is consistent with the function signature update and aligns with the PR objectives.

For improved readability, consider combining the two new lines into a single line:

"--embedding-model", embedding_model,

59-64: LGTM: Embedding model argument added to the parser.

The addition of the --embedding-model argument to the parser is a good improvement. It allows users to specify the embedding model from the command line, which aligns with the PR objectives and the updates to the generate_embeddings function.

For consistency with other arguments, consider moving the type=str parameter to the end of the argument definition:

parser.add_argument(
    "--embedding-model",
    default="text-embedding-3-small",
    help="Model to use for generating embeddings",
    type=str
)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 066aaea and 33bdabd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/quizgen/scripts/generate_embeddings_batch.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ents are available: - --concept-model: Specifies the model used for concept ex...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~132-~132: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ... the model used for concept extraction. Default is gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18. - `--quest...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...-mini-2024-07-18. - --questions-model`: Specifies the model used for question g...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...the model used for question generation. Default is gpt-4o-2024-08-06. - `--embedding-...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...pt-4o-2024-08-06. - --embedding-model`: Specifies the model used for generating...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...e model used for generating embeddings. Default is text-embedding-3-small. These arg...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/quizgen/scripts/generate_embeddings_batch.py (3)

10-10: LGTM: Function signature updated to include embedding model selection.

The addition of the embedding_model parameter to the generate_embeddings function aligns well with the PR objectives. This change allows for greater flexibility in model selection, which is consistent with the updates mentioned in the README.md.


67-67: LGTM: Embedding model correctly passed to generate_embeddings function.

The update to the generate_embeddings function call, which now includes the args.embedding_model parameter, ensures that the user-specified (or default) embedding model is correctly passed to the function. This change is consistent with the updates made to the function signature and argument parser.


Line range hint 1-71: Overall, the changes look good and address the PR objectives.

The implementation successfully introduces the embedding model selection feature, addressing the missing model selection argument issue mentioned in the PR objectives. The changes are well-integrated and maintain the overall structure and functionality of the script.

To ensure full compatibility, please run the following verification script:

This script will help verify that the new embedding model argument is correctly handled throughout the codebase and that there are no remaining TODOs or FIXMEs related to this change.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful: All checks have passed, and the embedding_model argument is correctly handled throughout the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new embedding model argument is correctly handled throughout the codebase.

# Test 1: Check if the README.md mentions the new embedding model argument
echo "Checking README.md for embedding model argument..."
grep -n "embedding-model" README.md

# Test 2: Verify that no other scripts directly call generate_embeddings without the new argument
echo "Checking for other scripts calling generate_embeddings..."
rg "generate_embeddings\s*\([^)]*\)" --type python

# Test 3: Look for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to embedding models
echo "Checking for TODOs or FIXMEs related to embedding models..."
rg "TODO|FIXME" --type python | grep -i "embedding"

echo "Verification complete. Please review the output to ensure all changes are consistent."

Length of output: 1006


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new embedding model argument is correctly handled throughout the codebase.

# Test 1: Check if the README.md mentions the new embedding model argument
echo "Checking README.md for embedding model argument..."
grep -n "embedding-model" README.md

# Test 2: Verify that no other scripts directly call generate_embeddings without the new argument
echo "Checking for other scripts calling generate_embeddings without the embedding model argument..."
rg "generate_embeddings\s*\([^)]*\)" --glob "*.py"

# Test 3: Look for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to embedding models
echo "Checking for TODOs or FIXMEs related to embedding models..."
rg "TODO|FIXME" --glob "*.py" | grep -i "embedding"

echo "Verification complete. Please review the output to ensure all changes are consistent."

Length of output: 1260

README.md (2)

126-144: LGTM! Clear and informative section on model selection.

The new "Model Selection" section is well-structured and provides valuable information on customizing the AI models used in different stages of the question generation process. The examples are clear and demonstrate proper usage for both single chapter and batch commands.

Could you please verify the accuracy of the default model names? They use unconventional formats (e.g., 'gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18', 'gpt-4o-2024-08-06') which might be internal or future model names. Ensure these are the correct, publicly available model names that users can access.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ents are available: - --concept-model: Specifies the model used for concept ex...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~132-~132: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ... the model used for concept extraction. Default is gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18. - `--quest...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...-mini-2024-07-18. - --questions-model`: Specifies the model used for question g...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...the model used for question generation. Default is gpt-4o-2024-08-06. - `--embedding-...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...pt-4o-2024-08-06. - --embedding-model`: Specifies the model used for generating...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...e model used for generating embeddings. Default is text-embedding-3-small. These arg...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


Line range hint 146-153: Great addition of example Anki decks!

The new "Example Anki Decks" section provides valuable practical examples of QuizGen's output, complete with download links. This addition enhances the README by showcasing real-world applications of the tool.

Please verify the dates mentioned for the Gradle User Manual and Go Programming Language Specification (both October 2024). These dates are in the future, which seems inconsistent. Consider updating to the current or most recent versions of these resources.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ents are available: - --concept-model: Specifies the model used for concept ex...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~132-~132: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ... the model used for concept extraction. Default is gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18. - `--quest...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...-mini-2024-07-18. - --questions-model`: Specifies the model used for question g...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~133-~133: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...the model used for question generation. Default is gpt-4o-2024-08-06. - `--embedding-...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...pt-4o-2024-08-06. - --embedding-model`: Specifies the model used for generating...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~134-~134: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...e model used for generating embeddings. Default is text-embedding-3-small. These arg...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)

@kdunee kdunee merged commit 3b58993 into main Oct 13, 2024
6 checks passed
@kdunee kdunee deleted the model-selection branch October 13, 2024 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant