Add an open source license to project? #35
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I suggested the MIT license. You will have to add whoever you want as the copyright holder to the license though.
The reason I am suggesting this change is because there is an open issue in the GitHub Linguist repository, which cites the syntax in this repository as a possible grammar to be used in that repository. If quakeC was added to linguist, it would be able to display it as its own language in the code breakdown at the bottom right corner of GitHub repositories, but in order to do that, a grammar like the one in this repository needs to be added, and it needs to have an acceptable open source license to be added.