Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Python 3.14 #607

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Jan 22, 2025

Python 3.14 is still in alpha, but I think we can start supporting it already?

@claudep
Copy link
Contributor

claudep commented Jan 22, 2025

As for me, there is no rush in adding 3.14 in the test suite, all the more that the code doesn't need any adaptations. The resource consumption is not worth it IMO.

@hugovk
Copy link
Member Author

hugovk commented Jan 22, 2025

This repo is pretty quiet and the extra CI time won't make much difference, but I'm fine to leave it until the beta if you prefer?

@andrewgy8
Copy link
Member

andrewgy8 commented Jan 22, 2025

Since you are the release manager for this and the next versions of Python, I see no issues to run it here. Any issues that arise Im sure will be smoothed out quickly 😜

@hugovk
Copy link
Member Author

hugovk commented Jan 22, 2025

Yes, and if we find any issues, it will help us get them fixed in CPython, or possibly other dependencies, before the big release in October.

But again, I don't mind waiting a bit longer.

@claudep
Copy link
Contributor

claudep commented Jan 22, 2025

Considering MS is building nuclear powerplants to power its infrastructure, I'd rather not push too much to add more compute power when there is no compelling added value ☢️ 😱

@hugovk hugovk marked this pull request as draft January 22, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants