Tag guard

[EddeCCC]

Add TagGuard, which enables to limit all or specific tags in measurements

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1625 (7c5ec13) into master (b204add) will increase coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 87.85%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1625      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     78.38%   78.54%   +0.16%     
- Complexity     2520     2570      +50     
============================================
  Files           257      266       +9     
  Lines          8257     8435     +178     
  Branches        984      995      +11     
============================================
+ Hits           6472     6625     +153     
- Misses         1358     1376      +18     
- Partials        427      434       +7     

Files	Coverage Δ
...ocelot/commons/models/health/AgentHealthState.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...t/ocelot/config/model/metrics/MetricsSettings.java	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...l/metrics/definition/MetricDefinitionSettings.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...core/command/handler/impl/LogsCommandExecutor.java	85.00% <ø> (ø)
...elot/core/exporter/OtlpMetricsExporterService.java	70.49% <ø> (ø)
...tation/config/MethodHookConfigurationResolver.java	96.18% <100.00%> (ø)
...core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGenerator.java	85.95% <100.00%> (ø)
.../instrumentation/hook/actions/MetricsRecorder.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...n/hook/actions/span/ContinueOrStartSpanAction.java	95.56% <ø> (ø)
...n/hook/actions/span/WriteSpanAttributesAction.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 16 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[TitusLabs]

Reviewed 1 of 9 files at r1, 8 of 23 files at r2, 7 of 255 files at r3, 223 of 240 files at r4, 1 of 2 files at r6, 33 of 35 files at r7, 5 of 5 files at r8, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @Dimi-Ma)

[Dimi-Ma]

Reviewed 1 of 9 files at r1, 8 of 23 files at r2, 7 of 255 files at r3, 229 of 240 files at r4, 1 of 2 files at r6, 33 of 35 files at r7, 5 of 5 files at r8, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 5 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EddeCCC)

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/exporter/ExporterServiceIntegrationTestBase.java line 330 at r7 (raw file):

        }

        public List<ExportMetricsServiceRequest> getMetricRequests() {

This function seems to not be used and could be removed

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/exporter/ExporterServiceIntegrationTestBase.java line 373 at r7 (raw file):

    }

    public OtlpGrpcServer getGrpcServer() {

same as above

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/selfmonitoring/AgentHealthIncidentBufferTest.java line 39 at r8 (raw file):

    }
    @Test
    void verifyBufferSize() {

this test is redundant.

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/selfmonitoring/AgentHealthManagerDeadlockGh1597IntTest.java line 52 at r7 (raw file):

            long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
            while (System.currentTimeMillis() - start < millisToRun) {
                cut.invalidateIncident(cut.getClass(), "Invalidation due to invalidator event");

Maybe it would be better to use a more descriptive message here.

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/selfmonitoring/AgentHealthManagerTest.java line 41 at r7 (raw file):

        @Test
        void verifyAgentHealthChangedEvent() {

This Test exists 2 times with the same name, one with invalidator as null and one where its set. Do these tests show the same result? The other test is under the nested class TimeoutHealth if its supposed to show something different it is not apparent from how the test is written. (goes for the other tests too since there are some duplicates with only the `ìnvalidator`` being a different value but having the same test name.

[Dimi-Ma]

Reviewed 65 of 65 files at r9, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EddeCCC)

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/selfmonitoring/AgentHealthIncidentBufferTest.java line 39 at r8 (raw file):

Previously, Dimi-Ma (Dimitiros Mantas) wrote…

this test is redundant.

Expected value is mocked so the test case is not valid and can be removed.

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/selfmonitoring/AgentHealthManagerTest.java line 41 at r7 (raw file):

Previously, Dimi-Ma (Dimitiros Mantas) wrote…

This Test exists 2 times with the same name, one with invalidator as null and one where its set. Do these tests show the same result? The other test is under the nested class TimeoutHealth if its supposed to show something different it is not apparent from how the test is written. (goes for the other tests too since there are some duplicates with only the `ìnvalidator`` being a different value but having the same test name.

The changes are fine but the naming can still be improved. It would be better to have a distinct name for each test to represent what is being tested in it.

[Dimi-Ma]

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r10, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EddeCCC)

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/WriteSpanAttributesAction.java line 4 at r10 (raw file):

import io.opentelemetry.api.trace.Span;
import lombok.*;

Do we want to group together imports of the same library if so when should be the the trigger set?

---

inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGeneratorTest.java line 30 at r10 (raw file):

import rocks.inspectit.ocelot.core.testutils.Dummy;

import java.util.*;

Same here, is this grouping really needed?

[EddeCCC]

Pull-Requested was approved. By-Passing to avoid unnecessary delay.