-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chores: bump deps #341
chores: bump deps #341
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to several files, primarily focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency ReviewThe following issues were found:
License Issuesgo.mod
Denied Licenses: GPL-1.0-or-later, LGPL-2.0-or-later OpenSSF ScorecardScorecard details
Scanned Files
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/blocksdk.go (1)
139-145
: Improve code readability by using a descriptive variable name.The boolean parameter
true
at line 144 lacks context. Consider creating a descriptive variable name to clarify its purpose.+// Define a descriptive variable name +const enableProposalProcessing = true + proposalHandler := blockabci.New( app.Logger(), app.txConfig.TxDecoder(), app.txConfig.TxEncoder(), mempool, - true, + enableProposalProcessing, )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
,!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/blocksdk.go
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run test and upload codecov
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/blocksdk.go (1)
130-136
: Verify Block SDK version compatibility.The addition of
app.BaseApp
parameter suggests a breaking change in the Block SDK v2 API. Please ensure that the Block SDK version specified ingo.mod
is compatible with this change.✅ Verification successful
Block SDK compatibility verified.
The
go.mod
file confirms the dependency is now usinggithub.com/skip-mev/block-sdk/v2 v2.1.5
, which supports the updated API requiring theapp.BaseApp
parameter. No further changes are needed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Block SDK version in go.mod grep "skip-mev/block-sdk/v2" go.modLength of output: 76
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #341 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 41.14% 41.15%
=======================================
Files 269 269
Lines 25737 25741 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 10589 10593 +4
Misses 13504 13504
Partials 1644 1644
|
Description
bump deps to latest
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...