Make game searches do an inner join to gameRatingsSandbox0_mv
#1273
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The code was doing a `left join` (aka a `left outer join`) to `gameRatingsSandbox0_mv` unless `$browse` mode is enabled and you're using one of the specified sort orders, in which case it does a simple `join` (an `inner join`). I wrote this code in PR #270, specifically in 3bd2c7a. But… why did I write that? Why didn't I just do an inner join in all cases? To be quite honest, I can't remember. I bet the issue was that `gameRatingsSandbox0_mv` didn't have exactly as many rows as the `games` table. (And I bet I was misusing `$browse` … it probably should have been `!$term`.) I believe that `gameRatingsSandbox0_mv` will always have a row for every game in the games table, now that we've merged #1266, and so it should be safe to do an inner join in all cases.
This was referenced Feb 3, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The code was doing a
left join(aka aleft outer join) togameRatingsSandbox0_mvunless$browsemode is enabled and you're using one of the specified sort orders, in which case it does a simplejoin(aninner join).I wrote this code in PR #270, specifically in 3bd2c7a. But… why did I write that? Why didn't I just do an inner join in all cases?
To be quite honest, I can't remember. I bet the issue was that
gameRatingsSandbox0_mvdidn't have exactly as many rows as thegamestable. (And I bet I was misusing$browse… it probably should have been!$term.)I believe that
gameRatingsSandbox0_mvwill always have a row for every game in the games table, now that we've merged #1266, and so it should be safe to do an inner join in all cases.