Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for Policy-Based Routing switches #36656

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ik-12
Copy link

@Ik-12 Ik-12 commented Jan 2, 2025

Proposed change

Added documentation for Policy-Based Routing Rule switches (new feature proposed in a PR to Unifi integration).

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

The Unifi integration now includes various types of switches for enabling or disabling different types of rules. To improve clarity, I have grouped the documentation for all these switches into a single section. Additionally, I have included the icons used for each rule type in the documentation, making it easier for users to identify the relevant switches.

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated UniFi Network integration documentation
    • Corrected section headings for Port Forwarding Rules and Traffic Rules
    • Added new section for Policy-Based Routing Rules
    • Improved clarity and consistency of network functionality descriptions

@Ik-12 Ik-12 requested a review from Kane610 as a code owner January 2, 2025 17:30
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch next This PR goes into the next branch labels Jan 2, 2025
@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Jan 2, 2025

It seems that this PR is targeted against an incorrect branch. Documentation updates which apply to our current stable release should target the current branch. Please change the target branch of this PR to current and rebase if needed. If this is documentation for a new feature, please add a link to that PR in your description.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the UniFi Network integration documentation, focusing on improving clarity and consistency in describing network control features. The changes involve correcting section headings, refining descriptions of port forwarding and traffic rules, and adding a new section about policy-based routing rules. The modifications aim to provide more precise information about how different network control entities are represented and identified.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/unifi.markdown - Corrected "Control Port forward functonality" heading to "Control Port Forwarding Rules"
- Renamed "Traffic Rules" section to "Control Traffic Rules"
- Added new section "Control Policy-Based Routing Rules"

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant UniFi Integration
    participant Network Entities
    
    User->>UniFi Integration: Configure Network Rules
    UniFi Integration->>Network Entities: Generate Entities
    Network Entities-->>User: Display Port Forwarding Rules
    Network Entities-->>User: Display Traffic Rules
    Network Entities-->>User: Display Policy-Based Routing Rules
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates how the UniFi Integration generates and displays different types of network rule entities to the user, reflecting the documentation updates.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/unifi.markdown (1)

158-160: Remove extra blank line for consistency

While the content is correct, there's an extra blank line between the heading and the content that isn't present in other similar sections. Consider removing it for consistency.

 ### Control Policy-Based Routing Rules
-
 Entities appear for each Policy-Based Routing Rule. The switches can be identified from icon {% icon "mdi:routes" %}.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e188ca and 2e35c16.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/unifi.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
source/_integrations/unifi.markdown (3)

150-152: Documentation looks good!

The Port Forwarding Rules section is clear, concise, and includes the appropriate icon reference for visual identification.


154-156: Documentation looks good!

The Traffic Rules section is well-documented with clear identification of the icon used for these switches.


150-160: Overall documentation structure is excellent!

The documentation for all three types of rules (Port Forwarding, Traffic, and Policy-Based Routing) is well-organized, consistent in style, and provides clear identification through icons. This makes it easy for users to understand and identify different types of switches in their Home Assistant interface.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2e35c16
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6776cd3e0ed7400008b0acd9
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-36656--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo label Jan 2, 2025
@home-assistant home-assistant bot removed the needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch label Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant