-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 566
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Monitoring] Partition UTask outcomes correctly into success and error #4516
Conversation
I'm not sure I agree that we will continuously take it. I think it's fine for us to not update this as we change tasks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, grudgingly.
#4516) ### Motivation #4458 implemented an error rate for utasks, only considering exceptions. In #4499 , outcomes were split between success, failure and maybe_retry conditions. There we learned that the volume of retryable outcomes is negligible, so it makes sense to count them as failures. Listing out all the success conditions under _MetricRecorder is not desirable. However, we are consciously taking this technical debt so we can deliver #4271 . A refactor of uworker main will be later performed, so we can split the success and failure conditions, both of which are mixed in uworker_output.ErrorType. Reference for tech debt acknowledgement: #4517
#4516) ### Motivation #4458 implemented an error rate for utasks, only considering exceptions. In #4499 , outcomes were split between success, failure and maybe_retry conditions. There we learned that the volume of retryable outcomes is negligible, so it makes sense to count them as failures. Listing out all the success conditions under _MetricRecorder is not desirable. However, we are consciously taking this technical debt so we can deliver #4271 . A refactor of uworker main will be later performed, so we can split the success and failure conditions, both of which are mixed in uworker_output.ErrorType. Reference for tech debt acknowledgement: #4517
#4516) ### Motivation #4458 implemented an error rate for utasks, only considering exceptions. In #4499 , outcomes were split between success, failure and maybe_retry conditions. There we learned that the volume of retryable outcomes is negligible, so it makes sense to count them as failures. Listing out all the success conditions under _MetricRecorder is not desirable. However, we are consciously taking this technical debt so we can deliver #4271 . A refactor of uworker main will be later performed, so we can split the success and failure conditions, both of which are mixed in uworker_output.ErrorType. Reference for tech debt acknowledgement: #4517
Motivation
#4458 implemented an error rate for utasks, only considering exceptions.
In #4499 , outcomes were split between success, failure and maybe_retry conditions. There we learned that the volume of retryable outcomes is negligible, so it makes sense to count them as failures.
Listing out all the success conditions under _MetricRecorder is not desirable. However, we are consciously taking this technical debt so we can deliver #4271 .
A refactor of uworker main will be later performed, so we can split the success and failure conditions, both of which are mixed in uworker_output.ErrorType.
Reference for tech debt acknowledgement: #4517