You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The vegn_N_uptake() function refills the N inorg pool to reach 0.2 kg N m-2. With this we get the following GPPs for p-model and gs_leuning respectively:
If we remove this adjunction of N, we get the following:
Questions:
Was this a hack? If so, there is something wrong with the models because they no not perform as expected without the refill.
If this was not a hack would it make more sense to refill to reach the initial_Ninorg rather than the hardcoded value 0.2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
vegn_N_uptake()
function refills the N inorg pool to reach 0.2 kg N m-2. With this we get the following GPPs for p-model and gs_leuning respectively:If we remove this adjunction of N, we get the following:
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: