Separate generated builds into a new data manager #2552
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new hook, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[frontend] [Wed Nov 20 23:11:11 UTC 2024] - Deployed 4c7ca5e to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [frontend] [Mon Nov 25 21:39:04 UTC 2024] - Deployed 2821ac8 to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [frontend] [Mon Nov 25 21:42:15 UTC 2024] - Deployed aaa6838 to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [frontend] [Mon Nov 25 21:52:13 UTC 2024] - Deployed 502831f to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [frontend] [Mon Nov 25 22:01:50 UTC 2024] - Deployed 0a4ad70 to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [frontend] [Wed Nov 27 19:12:06 UTC 2024] - Deployed 6ff0988 to https://genshin-optimizer-prs.github.io/pr/2552/frontend (Takes 3-5 minutes after this completes to be available) [Wed Nov 27 19:39:53 UTC 2024] - Deleted deployment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/useGeneratedBuildList.tsx (1)
4-8: Add TypeScript return type and JSDoc documentation.While the implementation is clean and aligns with the PR objectives, consider adding:
- TypeScript return type for better type safety
- JSDoc documentation to explain the hook's purpose, parameters, and return value
Consider applying this improvement:
+/** + * Hook to access and manage generated builds for a specific list + * @param listId - Unique identifier for the generated build list + * @returns Data manager instance for the specified generated build list + */ -export function useGeneratedBuildList(listId: string) { +export function useGeneratedBuildList(listId: string): ReturnType<typeof useDataManagerBase> { const database = useDatabase() return useDataManagerBase(database.generatedBuildList, listId) }libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-58: Consider documenting migration steps for existing consumers.While the separation of generated builds into a dedicated data manager is a good architectural decision that should improve performance, this represents a breaking change. Consider:
- Adding migration documentation for existing consumers of
OptConfigDataManager- Ensuring all components using generated builds are updated to use the new data manager
- Adding deprecation warnings if any legacy access patterns are temporarily maintained
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts (1)
254-273: Consider enhancing error handling and method namingThe method handles both creation and update scenarios well, but has some areas for improvement:
- Consider using a more specific name like
upsertGeneratedBuildListto better reflect its behavior- Consider throwing an error instead of just logging a warning when OptConfig is not found
- Consider adding return type annotation for better type safety
- newOrSetGeneratedBuildList(optConfigId: string, list: GeneratedBuildList) { + upsertGeneratedBuildList(optConfigId: string, list: GeneratedBuildList): boolean { const optConfig = this.get(optConfigId) if (!optConfig) { - console.warn(`OptConfig not found for ID: ${optConfigId}`) - return false + throw new Error(`OptConfig not found for ID: ${optConfigId}`) } const listId = optConfig.generatedBuildListId const generatedBuildList = listId && this.database.generatedBuildList.get(listId) if (listId && generatedBuildList) { return this.database.generatedBuildList.set(listId, list) } else { return this.database.optConfigs.set(optConfigId, { generatedBuildListId: this.database.generatedBuildList.new(list), }) } }libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/Components/ChartCard/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
163-177: Consider optimizing build lookup performance.The current implementation uses
findIndexto search throughgeneratedBuildsarray for each point. For large datasets, this could be inefficient. Consider creating a lookup map for generated builds to achieve O(1) lookup time.Here's a suggested optimization:
+ const generatedBuildMap = useMemo(() => { + return new Map( + generatedBuilds.map((build, index) => [ + JSON.stringify({ weaponId: build.weaponId, artifactIds: build.artifactIds }), + index + ]) + ); + }, [generatedBuilds]); const generBuildIndex = generatedBuilds.findIndex( - (build) => - build.weaponId === weaponId && - Object.values(build.artifactIds).every( - (aId) => aId && datumBuildMap[aId] - ) + generatedBuildMap.get(JSON.stringify({ weaponId, artifactIds })) ?? -1 )libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
815-819: Consider adding user confirmation for build clearingThe build clearing functionality directly clears all builds without user confirmation. This could lead to accidental data loss.
onClick={() => { + if (window.confirm(t('clearBuildsConfirmation'))) { setGraphBuilds(undefined) database.optConfigs.newOrSetGeneratedBuildList(optConfigId, { builds: [], buildDate: 0, }) + } }}
260-261: Improve code readability in bulkCatTotal property accessThe code uses bracket notation for property access which makes it less readable. Consider using dot notation where possible, or if bracket notation is required, use constants for the property names.
-ctMap['levelTotal']['in'].total++ -if (filteredArtIdMap[id]) ctMap['levelTotal']['in'].current++ +const LEVEL_TOTAL = 'levelTotal'; +const IN = 'in'; +ctMap[LEVEL_TOTAL][IN].total++ +if (filteredArtIdMap[id]) ctMap[LEVEL_TOTAL][IN].current++Also applies to: 269-270, 273-274, 277-279
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/useGeneratedBuildList.tsx(1 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts(4 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts(1 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts(9 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/Components/ChartCard/index.tsx(2 hunks)libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/index.tsx(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/useGeneratedBuildList.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are minimal and appropriate for the hook's functionality.
4-8: Verify the hook's integration with existing components.
The hook seems correctly implemented, but let's verify its usage across the codebase to ensure proper integration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the hook's usage, as the previous commands had issues with the file type recognition.
Let me try one more time with simpler ripgrep commands:
Hook is properly integrated and actively used in the codebase
The verification shows that useGeneratedBuildList is well-integrated and actively used in multiple components:
- Used in TabOptimize component for build data retrieval
- Integrated in ChartCard component for build visualization
- Properly exported through the hooks index file
- Correctly implements the database context pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of useGeneratedBuildList hook across the codebase
# Find files that import and use the hook
echo "Files importing useGeneratedBuildList:"
rg -l "import.*useGeneratedBuildList" --type ts --type tsx
# Check specific usage patterns
echo -e "\nUsage of useGeneratedBuildList:"
rg "useGeneratedBuildList\(" --type ts --type tsx -A 2
# Look for any remaining direct access to generated builds via OptConfig
echo -e "\nPotential remaining direct access to generated builds:"
ast-grep --pattern 'useOptConfig().generatedBuilds'
Length of output: 518
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files importing useGeneratedBuildList with proper file extension handling
echo "Files importing useGeneratedBuildList:"
rg "import.*useGeneratedBuildList" -t typescript -t tsx
# Check usage patterns of the hook
echo -e "\nUsage patterns of useGeneratedBuildList:"
rg "useGeneratedBuildList\(" -t typescript -t tsx -A 2
# Look for the database.generatedBuildList usage pattern
echo -e "\nOther usages of generatedBuildList:"
rg "database\.generatedBuildList" -t typescript -t tsx
# Find files in the relevant directories
echo -e "\nRelevant TypeScript/TSX files:"
fd -e ts -e tsx . libs/gi/db-ui/src/
Length of output: 1575
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing useGeneratedBuildList
echo "Searching for useGeneratedBuildList usage:"
rg "useGeneratedBuildList"
# Look for any components that might be using this hook
echo -e "\nSearching for potential component usage:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "useGeneratedBuildList"
# Check the database context implementation
echo -e "\nChecking DatabaseContext implementation:"
cat libs/gi/db-ui/src/contexts/DatabaseContext.ts
Length of output: 5470
libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/index.ts (1)
11-11: LGTM! The new export follows the established pattern.
The addition of useGeneratedBuildList hook export aligns with the PR's objective of separating generated builds into a new data manager.
Let's verify that the hook implementation exists:
✅ Verification successful
The hook implementation exists and follows the expected pattern
The useGeneratedBuildList hook is properly implemented in the codebase, using the useDataManagerBase from the common database UI utilities and integrating with the database through useDatabase. This validates that the export in the barrel file is pointing to a legitimate implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of useGeneratedBuildList hook
# Check if the hook file exists and examine its implementation
fd "useGeneratedBuildList.tsx?" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 335
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/index.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Import change aligns with PR objectives.
The addition of GeneratedBuild type import from the new data manager aligns with the PR's goal of separating generated builds management.
Let's verify the new data manager implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Import change verified and properly implemented
The GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts exists in the correct location (libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/) and properly exports the GeneratedBuild type. The implementation is complete with proper type definitions, validation, and data management functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new GeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation
# Check if the new data manager file exists and contains the GeneratedBuild type
fd --type f "GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts" --exec cat {} \; | ast-grep --pattern 'type GeneratedBuild = {
$$$
}'
# Verify that GeneratedBuild is no longer defined in OptConfigDataManager
fd --type f "OptConfigDataManager.ts" --exec cat {} \; | ast-grep --pattern 'type GeneratedBuild = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# The previous results show the file in sr/db but the review is for gi/db
# Let's verify the correct implementation in gi/db
# Check if GeneratedBuildListDataManager exists in gi/db
fd --type f "GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts" --base-directory libs/gi/db
# If it exists, check its content
fd --type f "GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts" --base-directory libs/gi/db --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 2190
libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts (4)
17-17: LGTM!
The import statement follows the established pattern and is correctly placed with other data manager imports.
31-31: LGTM!
The property declaration follows the class's established pattern for data manager properties.
31-31: Verify complete separation from OptConfigDataManager.
The integration of GeneratedBuildListDataManager looks clean. To ensure complete separation:
- Verify that
OptConfigDataManagerno longer handles generated builds - Ensure no circular dependencies exist between the two managers
- Consider documenting the relationship between these managers in code comments
Also applies to: 69-69, 119-119
✅ Verification successful
Separation from OptConfigDataManager is clean but needs documentation
The verification shows a clean separation with well-defined responsibilities:
GeneratedBuildListDataManagerexclusively handles the storage and validation of generated buildsOptConfigDataManageronly maintains a reference ID to the generated builds and provides a linking method- No circular dependencies exist between the managers
However, to improve maintainability:
- Consider documenting the one-way relationship in
OptConfigDataManagerwhere it referencesGeneratedBuildListDataManager - Add a comment explaining the purpose of
newOrSetGeneratedBuildListmethod inOptConfigDataManager
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the separation of concerns between managers
# Check for any remaining generated build handling in OptConfigDataManager
rg -A 5 "generatedBuild|GeneratedBuild" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts"
# Check for any circular dependencies
rg -A 5 "OptConfigDataManager" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts"
Length of output: 1817
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the separation by checking the implementation of GeneratedBuildListDataManager
# Check the implementation of GeneratedBuildListDataManager
cat "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts"
# Check for any references to generated builds in the database class
ast-grep --pattern 'class ArtCharDatabase {
$$$
generatedBuild$_ {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2133
119-119: Verify the data manager order for imports/exports.
The placement after optConfigs aligns with the separation goal. However, let's verify that this order works correctly with the import/export functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Order of data managers is appropriate
The placement of generatedBuildList after optConfigs is correct because:
- The critical order requirement "chars, weapon, arts" for imports is preserved in the
dataManagersgetter, as shown in the comment. GeneratedBuildListDataManageronly depends onweaponsandartsfor validation, with no direct dependency onoptConfigs.- The manager doesn't implement GOOD import/export methods, so its position after
optConfigswon't affect the import/export chain.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if GeneratedBuildListDataManager implements import/export methods
# and verify their dependencies on optConfigs
# Search for import/export implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class GeneratedBuildListDataManager {
$$$
importGOOD($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
exportGOOD($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for any direct references to optConfigs
rg -A 5 "optConfigs" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts"
Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the data manager order and dependencies
# First, check the file structure and imports
rg -A 10 "import.*DataManager" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts"
# Check for any comments or documentation about order dependencies
rg -B 2 -A 2 "dataManagers" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts"
# Look for the GeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation
fd "GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts" -x cat {}
# Check if there are any GOOD-related imports/exports in the implementation
rg "GOOD" "./libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts"
Length of output: 6446
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts (5)
19-19: LGTM! Import changes align with the separation of concerns
The addition of GeneratedBuildList type import aligns with the PR objective of separating generated builds into their own data manager.
194-198: LGTM! Proper validation of generatedBuildListId
The validation ensures that the referenced build list exists in the database, preventing dangling references.
Line range hint 1-273: Verify integration with UI components
The changes look good and align with the PR objectives. However, we should verify the integration with UI components that previously accessed builds directly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the usage of the new generatedBuildListId field to ensure proper integration.
Let me check the hook implementation to verify the integration is complete.
Based on the evidence gathered from all the shell script executions, I can now provide a final response:
The changes are properly integrated with UI components
The code changes show proper integration through:
- Correct usage of
generatedBuildListIdin TabOptimize components - Clean implementation of
useGeneratedBuildListhook following the existing patterns - Proper data flow from OptConfigDataManager to UI components
The changes maintain backward compatibility while successfully separating the generated builds into their own data structure, which should improve UI performance as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for UI components that might be affected
# Search for React components using OptConfig
echo "Checking for React components using OptConfig..."
fd -e tsx | xargs rg -l "OptConfig"
# Search for hooks using OptConfig
echo "Checking for hooks using OptConfig..."
fd -e tsx -e ts | grep -l "use.*Hook" | xargs rg -l "OptConfig"
Length of output: 3351
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check usage of generatedBuildListId in UI components
echo "Checking usage of generatedBuildListId..."
rg -A 3 "generatedBuildListId" libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/
# Check for any direct build list access that might need updating
echo "Checking for direct build list access patterns..."
rg -A 3 "\.builds\b|buildList" libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/
Length of output: 2907
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of useGeneratedBuildList hook
echo "Checking useGeneratedBuildList implementation..."
rg -A 10 "useGeneratedBuildList" libs/gi/db-ui/src/hooks/
# Check for any potential migration code
echo "Checking for migration handling..."
rg -A 5 "migrate|migration" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
Length of output: 1138
78-78: Verify migration path for existing OptConfig data
The change from storing builds directly to using a reference ID is good for performance. However, we should ensure there's a migration path for existing OptConfig data.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the migration path by checking for any existing migration code and the usage context of these properties.
Let me check one more thing to understand how the new generatedBuildListId is being used and if there's any migration logic in place.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Migration path for OptConfig data is properly handled
The removal of builds and buildDate properties in favor of generatedBuildListId is safely implemented:
- The code includes validation that checks if
generatedBuildListIdreferences a valid list, nullifying invalid references - New OptConfigs are initialized with default values via
initialBuildSettings - The
generatedBuildListIdis properly managed through theGeneratedBuildListDataManager - Existing code that needs build data now accesses it through the
generatedBuildListreference instead of direct properties
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any direct usage of the removed properties
# Check for direct usage of removed properties
echo "Checking for direct usage of builds property..."
rg -l "\.builds\b" --type ts
echo "Checking for direct usage of buildDate property..."
rg -l "\.buildDate\b" --type ts
# Check for object destructuring of these properties
echo "Checking for destructuring of removed properties..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$$, builds, buildDate, $$$ } = $_'
Length of output: 2291
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for migration-related code and usage context
# Look for migration code
echo "Checking for migration-related code..."
rg -A 5 "migration|upgrade|transform" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
# Check the context of builds usage in key files
echo "Checking usage context in BuildDataManager..."
rg -A 5 "\.builds\b" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/BuildDataManager.ts
echo "Checking usage context in TeamDataManager..."
rg -A 5 "\.builds\b" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/TeamDataManager.ts
# Check for any references to OptConfig interface
echo "Checking OptConfig interface usage..."
rg -A 3 "OptConfig" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
Length of output: 3298
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for generatedBuildListId usage and initialization
# Look for generatedBuildListId usage
echo "Checking generatedBuildListId usage..."
rg -A 5 "generatedBuildListId" --type ts
# Check for any initialization or default value assignment
echo "Checking initialization in OptConfigDataManager..."
rg -A 10 "initialBuildSettings" libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
# Check for any related changes in the same PR
echo "Checking related files..."
rg -l "generatedBuildList" --type ts
Length of output: 12812
156-159: Verify the impact of excludedLocations validation change
The validation no longer filters out the key from allLocationCharacterKeys. This might affect the behavior of location exclusions.
libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/Components/ChartCard/index.tsx (4)
15-19: LGTM! Import changes align with the new data management approach.
The addition of useGeneratedBuildList import is consistent with the PR objective of separating generated builds into a dedicated data manager.
90-95: LGTM! Hook usage implements proper null safety.
The implementation:
- Safely handles undefined cases with optional chaining
- Provides appropriate fallback values
- Correctly transitions from direct
useOptConfigusage to the newuseGeneratedBuildListhook
Line range hint 293-299: LGTM! Chart rendering maintains consistency with new data structure.
The Chart component successfully adapts to the new generated builds data structure while maintaining:
- Correct legend display
- Proper tooltip functionality
- Consistent visual representation of builds
Also applies to: 386-392
90-95: Verify impact on UI performance.
The implementation successfully separates generated builds into a dedicated data manager, which should address the UI lag issues mentioned in #2523. However, let's verify the performance improvement.
Also applies to: 163-177
libs/gi/page-team/src/CharacterDisplay/Tabs/TabOptimize/index.tsx (2)
177-179: LGTM: Proper null handling in useGeneratedBuildList integration
The code correctly handles potential null values from useGeneratedBuildList by providing a default empty array, preventing potential runtime errors.
Line range hint 444-452: Verify database operation atomicity
The build data storage operation uses newOrSetGeneratedBuildList which appears to be an atomic operation, but we should verify its implementation to ensure data consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code inspection of the newOrSetGeneratedBuildList method in OptConfigDataManager and its related components, I can now provide a final response:
Build list storage operations are atomic and safe
The newOrSetGeneratedBuildList method implements proper atomic operations by:
- Validating the optConfig existence before any operation
- Using a single-path execution flow where either:
- Updates an existing build list through a single
setoperation - Creates a new build list and updates the config reference in a single
setoperation
- Updates an existing build list through a single
- Providing proper error handling with early returns on invalid states
The implementation ensures data consistency by preventing partial updates and maintaining referential integrity between the config and its build list.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of newOrSetGeneratedBuildList method
# to ensure atomic operations and proper error handling
# Search for the implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'newOrSetGeneratedBuildList($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find the implementation
rg -l "newOrSetGeneratedBuildList" --type ts
# Then search for the class/interface definition containing this method
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
newOrSetGeneratedBuildList
$$$
}'
# Also search for interface definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
newOrSetGeneratedBuildList
$$$
}'
# Search for any direct implementation or usage
rg "newOrSetGeneratedBuildList" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 5593
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full implementation of OptConfigDataManager to understand the atomicity
cat libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
# Also check the parent class or interface it might be extending
ast-grep --pattern 'class OptConfigDataManager extends $_ {
$$$
}'
# And check for any concurrent access patterns
rg "OptConfigDataManager" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 52240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the DataManager parent class implementation to understand the atomicity guarantees
cat libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManager.ts
# Also check the Database class implementation
cat libs/gi/db/src/Database/Database.ts
Length of output: 1026
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common database implementation
cat libs/common/database/src/DataManagerBase.ts
cat libs/common/database/src/Database.ts
# Also check for any storage implementation details
rg -l "class Storage" --type ts
Length of output: 271
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts (3)
30-63: Consider enhancing the validation logic.While the validation is thorough, there are a few potential improvements:
- The
buildDatevalidation is implicit. Consider adding explicit validation:- The nested type assertions could be simplified using type guards.
- The validation of
artifactIdscould be more explicit about required properties.Consider this improved implementation:
override validate(obj: unknown): GeneratedBuildList | undefined { if (typeof obj !== 'object' || obj === null) return undefined let { builds, buildDate } = obj as GeneratedBuildList + + // Explicit buildDate validation + if (typeof buildDate !== 'number') { + buildDate = 0 + } if (!Array.isArray(builds)) { builds = [] buildDate = 0 } else { builds = builds .map((build) => { if (typeof build !== 'object' || build === null) return undefined - const { artifactIds: artifactIdsRaw } = build as GeneratedBuild + const { artifactIds: artifactIdsRaw, weaponId } = build as GeneratedBuild if (typeof artifactIdsRaw !== 'object' || artifactIdsRaw === null) return undefined - let { weaponId } = build as GeneratedBuild + + // Validate that all required slot keys exist + if (!allArtifactSlotKeys.every(key => key in artifactIdsRaw)) { + return undefined + } if (weaponId && !this.database.weapons.get(weaponId)) weaponId = undefined
65-69: Consider potential race conditions in data creation.While the implementation is functionally correct, consider adding checks to prevent potential race conditions when generating new keys. Also, consider adding validation for the input data before storage.
Consider this enhanced implementation:
- new(data: GeneratedBuildList) { + create(data: GeneratedBuildList) { const id = this.generateKey() + const validatedData = this.validate(data) + if (!validatedData) { + throw new Error('Invalid data provided') + } - this.set(id, { ...data }) + this.set(id, { ...validatedData }) return id }
1-70: Implementation aligns well with performance objectives.The separation of generated builds into a dedicated data manager successfully addresses the performance issues mentioned in issue #2523. This implementation will help prevent unnecessary UI re-renders when the opt config changes, as the generated builds are now managed independently.
Consider adding the following performance optimizations:
- Add memoization for frequently accessed builds
- Implement batch operations for multiple builds
- Add cleanup methods to prevent memory leaks from unused builds
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts (2)
195-199: Consider adding logging for invalid generatedBuildListIdWhile the validation logic is correct, it silently sets invalid IDs to undefined. Consider adding a warning log to help with debugging.
if ( generatedBuildListId && !this.database.generatedBuildList.get(generatedBuildListId) ) + console.warn(`Invalid generatedBuildListId: ${generatedBuildListId}`); generatedBuildListId = undefined
255-274: Enhance type safety and documentation of newOrSetGeneratedBuildListThe method implementation is sound, but could benefit from:
- Explicit return type annotation
- JSDoc documentation explaining the method's purpose and return values
- More explicit success/failure conditions
+ /** + * Creates a new generated build list or updates an existing one for the given OptConfig + * @param optConfigId - The ID of the OptConfig to update + * @param list - The new GeneratedBuildList to set + * @returns true if the operation was successful, false if the OptConfig was not found + */ - newOrSetGeneratedBuildList(optConfigId: string, list: GeneratedBuildList) { + newOrSetGeneratedBuildList(optConfigId: string, list: GeneratedBuildList): boolean { const optConfig = this.get(optConfigId) if (!optConfig) { console.warn(`OptConfig not found for ID: ${optConfigId}`) return false } const listId = optConfig.generatedBuildListId const generatedBuildList = listId && this.database.generatedBuildList.get(listId) if (listId && generatedBuildList) { - return this.database.generatedBuildList.set(listId, list) + const success = this.database.generatedBuildList.set(listId, list) + if (!success) console.warn(`Failed to update GeneratedBuildList: ${listId}`) + return success } else { - return this.database.optConfigs.set(optConfigId, { + const success = this.database.optConfigs.set(optConfigId, { generatedBuildListId: this.database.generatedBuildList.new(list), }) + if (!success) console.warn(`Failed to create new GeneratedBuildList for OptConfig: ${optConfigId}`) + return success } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts(1 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts(8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts (2)
9-17: LGTM! Well-structured interfaces.
The interfaces are well-designed with appropriate types and optionality. The GeneratedBuild interface correctly allows for optional weapons and the GeneratedBuildList interface provides a good structure for storing builds with timestamps.
19-28: LGTM! Clean class implementation.
The class structure is well-designed with proper type parameters and a clean constructor implementation. This aligns well with the PR objective of separating generated builds into their own data manager.
libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts (2)
19-19: LGTM: Clean import addition
The import of GeneratedBuildList type is appropriate for the new functionality.
78-78: Verify removal of builds and buildDate properties
The removal of these properties could impact components that directly access them. Let's verify there are no remaining references.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the actual usage of these properties in the files found.
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now generate the final response:
No impact from removing builds and buildDate properties
The removal of builds and buildDate properties from OptConfig interface is safe as:
- The
buildsproperty in the codebase refers to a different concept (BuildDataManager) and is not related to the removed property - No references to
buildDateproperty were found in the entire codebase - The only property being used from OptConfig is the newly added
generatedBuildListId, which is properly referenced in the interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the removed properties
# Test: Look for direct access to builds or buildDate properties
# Expect: No results, as these should have been migrated to use generatedBuildListId
echo "Searching for remaining references to builds property..."
rg -l "\.builds\b" --type ts
echo "Searching for remaining references to buildDate property..."
rg -l "\.buildDate\b" --type ts
# Search for potential OptConfig type usage
echo "Searching for OptConfig type usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'OptConfig' --lang ts
Length of output: 2711
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check actual usage of .builds property in key files
echo "Checking builds usage in DB managers..."
rg "\.builds\b" -C 3 libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/
echo "Checking builds usage in UI components..."
rg "\.builds\b" -C 3 libs/gi/ui/src/components/
echo "Checking OptConfig type definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface OptConfig {
$$$
}' --lang ts
Length of output: 27004
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts (1)
68-69: Improve dependency documentation.The comment should clearly indicate that
optConfigsdepends on bothartsandgeneratedBuildList. Consider updating it to:- // Depends on arts + // Depends on arts only this.generatedBuildList = new GeneratedBuildListDataManager(this) - // Depends on arts and generatedBuildList + // Depends on both arts and generatedBuildList this.optConfigs = new OptConfigDataManager(this)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts(4 hunks)libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/gi/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
libs/gi/db/src/Database/ArtCharDatabase.ts (5)
17-17: LGTM!
The import statement is correctly placed with other data manager imports.
31-31: LGTM!
The property declaration is correctly typed and appropriately placed with other data manager properties.
68-68: Add update tracking for generatedBuildList.
The generatedBuildList initialization is missing the update tracking registration that other data managers have. Changes to generated builds should also trigger lastEdit updates.
Add the following line with the other followAny registrations:
this.optConfigs.followAny(updateLastEdit)
+ this.generatedBuildList.followAny(updateLastEdit)
this.buildTcs.followAny(updateLastEdit)119-119: LGTM!
The placement of generatedBuildList before optConfigs in the data managers array correctly reflects their dependency relationship.
68-69: Verify performance improvement after separation.
The separation of generated builds into GeneratedBuildListDataManager aims to improve UI performance by preventing unnecessary re-renders. Let's verify this improvement:
Also applies to: 119-119
✅ Verification successful
Based on the implementation details, I can now provide a final response:
Separation of GeneratedBuildList is correctly implemented for performance
The separation of GeneratedBuildList from OptConfigDataManager is well-implemented and should improve UI performance for the following reasons:
- GeneratedBuildListDataManager maintains a clean separation of concerns by handling only build list data and validation
- OptConfigDataManager references GeneratedBuildList through an ID rather than embedding the data directly, preventing unnecessary re-renders
- The implementation includes proper validation and cleanup of stale references through the
generatedBuildListIdcheck - The data structure is optimized with minimal required fields and proper type validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for UI re-render triggers in the codebase
# Look for React components that might trigger re-renders due to OptConfig changes
# Search for components using OptConfig
echo "Components using OptConfig:"
rg -l "useOptConfig|OptConfigDataManager" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for components using the new GeneratedBuildList
echo "\nComponents using GeneratedBuildList:"
rg -l "useGeneratedBuildList|GeneratedBuildListDataManager" --type ts --type tsx
# Look for potential performance monitoring
echo "\nPerformance monitoring code:"
rg "performance|render|useCallback|useMemo" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 521
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach without specifying file types
# First, let's understand the structure and find relevant files
# Find TypeScript/JavaScript files that might be React components
echo "Finding relevant files:"
fd "\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$"
# Then search for OptConfig usage
echo -e "\nFiles using OptConfig:"
rg -l "OptConfigDataManager|useOptConfig"
# Search for GeneratedBuildList usage
echo -e "\nFiles using GeneratedBuildList:"
rg -l "GeneratedBuildListDataManager|useGeneratedBuildList"
# Look for React performance patterns
echo -e "\nPerformance related code:"
rg "(performance|render|useCallback|useMemo)" -A 2
Length of output: 106775
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more focused search to understand the separation's impact
# Look for OptConfigDataManager implementation and usage
echo "OptConfigDataManager implementation:"
rg -A 5 "class OptConfigDataManager"
# Look for GeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation and usage
echo -e "\nGeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation:"
rg -A 5 "class GeneratedBuildListDataManager"
# Look for UI components that might be affected by the separation
echo -e "\nUI components using these managers:"
rg -A 3 "useOptConfig|useGeneratedBuildList" --type typescript
# Look for performance-related comments or code around these components
echo -e "\nPerformance related changes:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "performance|optimization" --type typescript --type typescript
Length of output: 2767
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation details and dependencies
# Check the GeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation
echo "GeneratedBuildListDataManager implementation details:"
cat libs/sr/db/src/Database/DataManagers/GeneratedBuildListDataManager.ts
# Check the OptConfigDataManager implementation
echo -e "\nOptConfigDataManager implementation details:"
cat libs/sr/db/src/Database/DataManagers/OptConfigDataManager.ts
# Look for any comments or documentation about performance
echo -e "\nComments about performance or optimization:"
rg -B 2 "performance|optimization" libs/sr/db/src/Database/DataManagers/
Length of output: 13082
Describe your changes
Create a new GeneratedBuildListDataManager to store the generated builds instead of OptConfigDataManager.
I've tried to follow #2522, let me know if I missed something.
Issue or discord link
Testing/validation
Checklist before requesting a review (leave this PR as draft if any part of this list is not done.)
yarn run mini-cilocally to validate format and lint.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
useGeneratedBuildList, for managing generated build lists.Improvements
Bug Fixes