Promote ivanvc to approver for etcd website

[jmhbnz]

Reviewing the last 12 months contribution data https://github.com/etcd-io/website/graphs/contributors?from=6%2F01%2F2024 @ivanvc has been our top contributor to the etcd.io website.

Their contributions have been high quality, helped reduce toil and improve the state of this repository, including key items such as:

• Add Markdown diff linter #879
• github/workflows: introduce action to update version tag #845
• Improvements to the GitHub update release version workflow #872

Additionally they have helped discuss and review many of the proposed pr's for this repository since joining the project https://github.com/etcd-io/website/pulls?q=is%3Apr+comment-by%3A%40ivanvc+.

@ivanvc is already a reviewer for etcd-io/etcd and a trusted member of our release team so with this pull request I propose we recognise their efforts here by promoting them to an approver for etcd-io/website.

cc @etcd-io/maintainers-website

[ahrtr]

/lgtm
/approve

Well deserved! I wanted to raise the same proposal long time ago. A big THANK YOU to @ivanvc !

[jberkus]

/approve
/lgtm

[jberkus]

... what else does this PR require to merge?

[spzala]

/lgtm
Thanks for your contributions @ivanvc

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, jberkus, jmhbnz, spzala

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ahrtr,jberkus,jmhbnz,spzala]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jmhbnz]

... what else does this PR require to merge?

As outlined in https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/Documentation/contributor-guide/community-membership.md#maintainers

Defined by: approvers entry in the OWNERS file.

Sponsored by two active maintainers and elected by supermajority

Sponsors must be from multiple member companies to demonstrate integration across the community.

We currently have support from 4/8 existing members of @etcd-io/maintainers-website group. Which is not a super majority. However there is a lazy consensus of three business weeks specified in https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md we can fall back on.

This does probably call into question if @chalin and @nate-double-u should still be listed as approvers still given they have not made any commits to the repo in last 12 months and are cncf staff vs etcd project team per se.

@chalin, @nate-double-u can you please let us know if we should be removing you as maintainers for this repository? Thanks.

[nate-double-u]

Hi James,

I know I trailed off a bit last year, but I'm happy to stay on--I'm still an approver over on kubernetes/website, and can extend my work there to cover etcd-io/website. I've also got access to the Kubernetes-Docs Netlify team, so I'm happy to help with any website CI issues that might come up.

[jberkus]

Gah, I forgot about the supermajority thing. We should probably change that.

[serathius]

LGTM

[jmhbnz]

Merging 6/8 maintainers appear supportive for this pr which is a super majority.