Abstract Token Transfers #7556
Open
Abstract Token Transfers #7556
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rs.sql Changed file name
github-actions
bot
added
WIP
|
Depends on #7493 |
yes, due to inner join to |
|
Hi @peterrliem, I have updated the PR and resolved the conflicts. |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-for-review
|
Not sure about the CI error: |
this is due to trino upgrade testing on CI cluster from platform team. i will inform them. this may apply across various PRs until resolved. |
Hosuke
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2025
| traces = source('abstract','traces'), | ||
| transactions = source('abstract','transactions'), | ||
| erc20_transfers = source('erc20_abstract','evt_transfer'), | ||
| native_contract_address = null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we use evms.info to fill this field?
Hosuke
added
ready-for-final-review
and removed
ready-for-review
|
yes please! that works for me
…On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 9:58 PM Huang Geyang ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
LGTM.✅
Thank you @peterrliem <https://github.com/peterrliem>
Sample tokens_abstract_transfers <https://dune.com/queries/4652949>
------------------------------
In
dbt_subprojects/tokens/models/transfers_and_balances/abstract/tokens_abstract_base_transfers.sql
<#7556 (comment)>
:
> + alias = 'base_transfers',
+ partition_by = ['block_month'],
+ materialized = 'incremental',
+ file_format = 'delta',
+ incremental_strategy = 'merge',
+ incremental_predicates = [incremental_predicate('DBT_INTERNAL_DEST.block_time')],
+ unique_key = ['block_date','unique_key'],
+ )
+ }}
+
+ {{transfers_base(
+ blockchain='abstract',
+ traces = source('abstract','traces'),
+ transactions = source('abstract','transactions'),
+ erc20_transfers = source('erc20_abstract','evt_transfer'),
+ native_contract_address = null
Should we use evms.info to fill this field?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7556 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4L7YOVMDU6HEODPVEYEGT2NYP6XAVCNFSM6AAAAABV4JXWHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDKOBYGU3DAMZSGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for contributing to Spellbook 🪄
Please open the PR in draft and mark as ready when you want to request a review.
Description:
[...]
quick links for more information: