Api 43967 fix special issues issue

[rockwellwindsor-va]

Summary

• Adjusts special issue updater code to always be sending an array to avoid code working in one scenario bt not others
• Adds test for related method

Related issue(s)

API-43967

Testing done

• New code is covered by unit tests
• Describe what the old behavior was prior to the change
• Describe the steps required to verify your changes are working as expected. Exclusively stating 'Specs run' is NOT acceptable as appropriate testing
• If this work is behind a flipper:
  • Tests need to be written for both the flipper on and flipper off scenarios. Docs.
  • What is the testing plan for rolling out the feature?

Screenshots

• If you run a v1 526 with a special issue you can monitor to make sure the WSDL get call does not occur

What areas of the site does it impact?

modified:   modules/claims_api/app/clients/claims_api/bgs_client/definitions.rb
modified:   modules/claims_api/app/sidekiq/claims_api/special_issue_updater.rb
modified:   modules/claims_api/spec/sidekiq/special_issue_updater_spec.rb

Acceptance criteria

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No error nor warning in the console.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• Documentation has been updated (link to documentation)
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog (if applicable)
• If app impacted requires authentication, did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected
• I added a screenshot of the developed feature

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL)What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

[tycol7]

Could we just use Array.wrap? No need for a comment.

Suggested change

	# Let's just always know it is an array
	contentions =
	contention[:special_issues].is_a?(Hash) ? [contention[:special_issues]] : contention[:special_issues]
	contentions = Array.wrap(contention[:special_issues])

[rockwellwindsor-va]

Yep works perfectly 58de957