ZSF 99536 Migrate BenefitsIntakeStatusJob

[wayne-weibel]

Note: Delete the description statements, complete each step. None are optional, but can be justified as to why they cannot be completed as written. Provide known gaps to testing that may raise the risk of merging to production.

Summary

• This work is behind a feature toggle (flipper): YES
• activate new submission tracking job with implementation of handlers

Related issue(s)

ZSF | Replace BenefitsIntakeStatusJob with BenefitsIntake::SubmissionStatusJob

Testing done

• New code is covered by unit tests
• periodic jobs now tested
• job ran locally
• on staging will enable and ensure no error

What areas of the site does it impact?

status checks to lighthouse benefits intake

Acceptance criteria

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No error nor warning in the console.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog (if applicable)

[github-actions]

1 Warning

⚠️

This PR changes 345 LoC (not counting whitespace/newlines). In order to ensure each PR receives the proper attention it deserves, we recommend not exceeding 200. Expect some delays getting reviews. File Summary Files .github/CODEOWNERS (+2/-1) app/sidekiq/benefits_intake_status_job.rb (+1/-0) config/features.yml (+3/-0) config/initializers/benefits_intake_submission_status_handlers.rb (+12/-0) lib/lighthouse/benefits_intake/sidekiq/submission_status_job.rb (+18/-19) lib/lighthouse/benefits_intake/submission_handler/saved_claim.rb (+10/-17) lib/periodic_jobs.rb (+2/-1) spec/lib/lighthouse/benefits_intake/sidekiq/submission_status_job_spec.rb (+191/-0) spec/lib/lighthouse/benefits_intake/submission_handler/saved_claim_spec.rb (+35/-0) spec/lib/periodic_jobs_spec.rb (+12/-0) spec/sidekiq/benefits_intake_status_job_spec.rb (+15/-0) spec/spec_helper.rb (+6/-0) Note: We exclude files matching the following when considering PR size: *.csv, *.json, *.tsv, *.txt, *.md, Gemfile.lock, app/swagger, modules/mobile/docs, spec/fixtures/, spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, modules/mobile/spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, db/seeds, modules/vaos/app/docs, modules/meb_api/app/docs, modules/appeals_api/app/swagger/, *.bru, *.pdf Big PRs are difficult to review, often become stale, and cause delays.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[TaiWilkin]

LGTM