Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(config/readme): update README.md with architecture link #252

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anakafeel
Copy link
Contributor

@anakafeel anakafeel commented Jan 11, 2025

Checklist

  • I've thoroughly read the latest contribution guidelines.
  • I've rebased my branch onto main before creating this PR.
  • I've added tests to cover my changes (if applicable).
  • I've verified that all new and existing tests have passed locally for mobile, tablet, and desktop screen sizes.
  • My commit messages follow guidelines
  • My change requires documentation updates.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • My code follows existing patterns of this project and/or improves upon them.

Before:

image

After:

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README with a revised architecture section image
    • Refined the visual presentation of architecture information

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the README.md file, specifically focusing on the architecture section's visual representation. The changes include removing an existing image line and adding a new line with a different formatting for the same architecture image. These modifications aim to enhance the visual clarity and organization of the README's architecture information without altering the core content or functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated architecture section image formatting and layout

Suggested labels

released

Suggested reviewers

  • JowiAoun
  • MFarabi619

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A README's visual dance,
Where images shift with a glance,
Architecture's tale retold,
In lines of markdown, clear and bold,
A rabbit's view of design's expanse! 🖼️


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

51-52: LGTM! The architecture section is well-integrated.

The new table row for architecture maintains visual consistency with other sections and provides a clear link to the architecture documentation.

A minor suggestion to improve the table structure:

-| [🛠️ Architecture](https://arch.cuhacking.ca/#/projects/all?groupByFolder=true) |
-|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| ![Architecture](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14de2624-e2a4-4a45-a2b4-8a81b3260a93) |
+|                [🛠️ Architecture](https://arch.cuhacking.ca/#/projects/all?groupByFolder=true)                |
+| :-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: |
+| ![Architecture](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14de2624-e2a4-4a45-a2b4-8a81b3260a93) |

This aligns the formatting with other table sections by:

  1. Adding consistent padding
  2. Using :---: for center alignment
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~52-~52: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3852 characters long)
Context: ...------------------------------------| | ![Architecture](https://github.com/user-a...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 447389e and 8735de7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~52-~52: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3852 characters long)
Context: ...------------------------------------| | ![Architecture](https://github.com/user-a...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant