-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EtaBToJpsiJpsi gen fragment at 14 TeV for release validation #33386
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33386/21999
|
A new Pull Request was created by @vjmastra (Vincenzo) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Generator @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @srimanob, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
this will definitely conflict with #33324 (just so everyone is aware) |
Is it possible that extra HLT requests come together in the same PR? This is confusing... |
Hi @vjmastra |
Hi @srimanob, the GEN fragment I uploaded is needed for the release validation (as described here https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/PDMVRELVALS-115). Hi @chayanit, from the comments on Jira I understand that it is ok to upload the fragment, |
Ah, my false sorry. You define the fragment in upgradeWorkflowComponents.py also. |
Configuration/Generator/python/EtaBToJpsiJpsi_forSTEAM_14TeV_TuneCP5_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
My comment is then the filename should not contain "_forSTEAM". It is GEN fragment file that can be used for anything. |
|
||
generator.PythiaParameters.processParameters.extend(EvtGenExtraParticles) | ||
|
||
etafilter = cms.EDFilter("PythiaFilter", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this called etafilter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did as in previous version of the fragment available in CMSSW (
cmssw/Configuration/Generator/python/EtaBToJpsiJpsi_forSTEAM_TuneCUEP8M1_13TeV_cfi.py
Line 44 in 02d443b
etafilter = cms.EDFilter("PythiaFilter", |
The BSM Higgs (pdgid=35) with mass forced to the same as etaB is used instead of an etaB.
The filter requires its presence.
'443:onMode = off', | ||
'443:onIfMatch 13 -13', | ||
############# Fix to mass of etaB (9.4 GeV) ############# | ||
'35:mMin = 0', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the purpose of min and max if you set 0 width ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left the properties as in the previous version of the fragment
cmssw/Configuration/Generator/python/EtaBToJpsiJpsi_forSTEAM_TuneCUEP8M1_13TeV_cfi.py
Line 31 in 02d443b
'35:mMin = 0', |
The definition of the mass range should have no effect as width is set to 0
I have a small comment on the name. If we want to follow the dataset convention it should be TuneCP5_14TeV_pythia8. Sometimes we indicate ptyhia8 in fragments, sometimes not. Clearly having it makes it easier to understand what is hidden in the file. Not sure if filter info should be added. The name includes most of it. No strong opinion. |
I couldn't see this kind of naming under Configuration/Generator/python ... |
Maybe you can just add _pythia8, so EtaBToJpsiJpsi_14TeV_TuneCP5_pythia8_cfi.py |
…neCP5_pythia8_cfi.py
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33386/22370 |
Pull request #33386 was updated. @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please check and sign again. |
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b2201d/14714/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
PR description:
EtaB to JpsiJpsi to 4muon gen fragment for release validation
targeting BPH multi-lepton trigger paths, not covered for the time being.
The etaB is modeled with a BSM H0 (as done in previous versions of the fragment)
PR validation:
The measured filter efficiency on a generated sample of 5k events is 35%