-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Addition of the MTD to the tracker Navigation #33272
Addition of the MTD to the tracker Navigation #33272
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33272/21768
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33272/21769
|
A new Pull Request was created by @parbol for master. It involves the following packages: RecoMTD/DetLayers @perrotta, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ | |||
# process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.Geometry_cff") | |||
#process.load('Configuration.StandardSequences.GeometryRecoDB_cff') | |||
#process.load('Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2023D1Reco_cff') | |||
process.load('Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2023D4Reco_cff') | |||
#process.load('Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2023D4Reco_cff') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parbol strictly speaking we have no more 2023 geometries, so these lines are useless (even if harmless)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Fabio,
I have remove the reference to the 2023 geometries in a later commit.
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: Build BuildI found compilation error when building: from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/RecoTracker/TkDetLayers/interface/GeometricSearchTracker.h:4, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/TrackingTools/RecoGeometry/interface/GlobalDetLayerGeometry.h:11, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/TrackingTools/RecoGeometry/src/GlobalDetLayerGeometry.cc:1: /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/slc7_amd64_gcc900/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/FWCore/Utilities/interface/Exception.h: In instantiation of 'typename cms::detail::Desired::type>::value>::type& cms::operator<<(E&&, const T&) [with E = cms::Exception&; T = DetId; typename cms::detail::Desired::type>::value>::type = cms::Exception&]': /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/TrackingTools/RecoGeometry/src/GlobalDetLayerGeometry.cc:15:51: required from here /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/slc7_amd64_gcc900/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/FWCore/Utilities/interface/Exception.h:203:12: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'std::ostringstream' {aka 'std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream'} and 'const DetId') 203 | e.ost_ << stuff; | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ In file included from /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/slc7_amd64_gcc900/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/DataFormats/DetId/interface/DetId.h:5, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/TrackingTools/RecoGeometry/interface/GlobalDetLayerGeometry.h:10, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-25-2300/src/TrackingTools/RecoGeometry/src/GlobalDetLayerGeometry.cc:1: |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33272/21789
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33272/21987
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4c715d/14137/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+1
|
While reviewing this code I noticed a few possible simplifications for Let me list them here, in case you want to apply them in a possible follow up PR:
|
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR implements the addition of the MTD DetLayers into the GeometricSearchTracker to be used in the tracker navigation.
This PR overloads the "build" function of the GeometricSearchTrackerBuilder with another "build" function that builds the tracker and the MTD and arranges all the DetLayers properly. The PR also proposes a new TrackerMTDRecoGeometryESProducer invoking this alternative build function.
It should be noted that this producer is never used in the code so this development will not produce any change in the reconstruction, but it will help us to continue doing our developments to fully integrate the MTD in the tracking.
The code can be tested by running the TkNavigation tester:
RecoTracker/TkNavigation/test/NavigationSchoolAnalyzer.cc
by replacing the TrackerRecoGeometryESProducer by the TrackerMTDRecoGeometryESProducer in the configuration file:
RecoTracker/TkNavigation/test/NavigationSchoolAnalyzer_cfg.py
The ideas of this PR were discussed already some time ago in several meetings:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/923095/contributions/3878403/attachments/2047579/3431258/RECO-Talk-For-MTDDPGMay29.pdf
A github issue was also opened to discuss about this:
#29267
Thanks!