Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate Alignment/TrackerAlignment to use esConsumes #32301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2020

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Nov 26, 2020

PR description:

The purpose of this PR is to modernize the Alignment/TrackerAlignment subsystem, points addressed are:

PR validation:

Branch compiles and run the unit tests successfully.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This is not a backport and no backport is needed.

CAVEAT

There is a known potential merge conflict with PR #32278, once that's merged I will rebase mine.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32301/20121

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation
Alignment/TrackerAlignment

@yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 27, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: cadcd35

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-26-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8f1d6/11097/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: Build ClangBuild

  • Build:

I found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page.

  • Clang:

I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:

USER_CUDA_FLAGS='--expt-relaxed-constexpr' USER_CXXFLAGS='-Wno-register -fsyntax-only' scram build -k -j 32 COMPILER='llvm compile'

See details on the summary page.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32301/20190

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

Pull request #32301 was updated. @yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 1, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

+1
Tested at: 6106859
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8f1d6/11204/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-30-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8f1d6/11204/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8f1d6/11204/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8f1d6/11204/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529563
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 34 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • esConsumes migration completed for this package
  • no unexpected changes in PR comparison tests

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 398e2ae into cms-sw:master Dec 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants