Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporarily remove from the matrix workflows for D72 and D73 #31899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2020

Conversation

fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

#31842 activated in the matrix tests for scenarios D72 and D73 which cannot work until when #31765 is integrated, as the tracking layer geometry for the corresponding ETL design is implemented only in that PR. In order to prevent an innocuous but annoying crash in the IB I temporarily switch off them within the standard matrix.

PR validation:

11:21 farmui01 518> runTheMatrix.py -n | grep D7
32234.0 2026D70+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal 
32634.0 2026D71+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal 
33834.0 2026D74+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal 

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31899/19308

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 22, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@chayanit, @cmsbuild, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @jordan-martins can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@silviodonato there test will not really check this PR, anyway as soon as you integrate it the (understood) crashes will go

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

addressing #31895

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 0e952f3
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b1af91/10197/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-21-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

urgent
(just to remember to myself to merge this PR)

@chayanit
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b1af91/10197/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544087
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 57b98a9 into cms-sw:master Oct 22, 2020
@fabiocos fabiocos deleted the fc-fixWFs branch October 23, 2020 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants