[14.0][IMP] cetmix_tower_server: On delete flight plan #189
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces an enhanced server deletion mechanism in the Cetmix Tower Server system. The changes focus on implementing a flight plan-based approach to server deletion, adding new fields and methods to the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (1)⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (1)
487-495: Simplify the return statement in_is_being_deletedmethod.The return statement can be simplified since
self.status == "deleting"already returns a boolean value.Apply this diff to simplify the method:
- return self.status and self.status == "deleting" + return self.status == "deleting"cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (2)
261-267: Consider improving field placement and attributes for better UX.The new deletion-related fields could benefit from the following improvements:
- The group name "delete" could be more descriptive, e.g., "Deletion Settings"
- The
plan_delete_idfield lacks domain/context attributes to filter relevant plans- Consider adding tooltips to explain the purpose of these fields
Apply this diff to enhance the field definitions:
- <group extra="delete"> + <group name="deletion_settings" string="Deletion Settings"> <field name="server_template_id" attrs="{'invisible': [('server_template_id', '=', False)]}" + readonly="1" /> - <field name="plan_delete_id" /> + <field + name="plan_delete_id" + domain="[('state', '=', 'confirmed')]" + context="{'default_server_id': active_id}" + help="Select a flight plan to execute when deleting this server" + /> </group>
261-267: Consider moving deletion settings to a separate page.Given the critical nature of server deletion operations, consider moving these settings to a dedicated notebook page. This would:
- Make the deletion settings more prominent
- Separate critical operations from general settings
- Allow for future expansion of deletion-related features
Apply this diff to move the settings to a new page:
- <group extra="delete"> - <field - name="server_template_id" - attrs="{'invisible': [('server_template_id', '=', False)]}" - /> - <field name="plan_delete_id" /> - </group> <field name="note" placeholder="Put your notes here" /> </group> </page> + <page name="deletion" string="Deletion Settings" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager"> + <group> + <group name="deletion_settings" string="Flight Plan"> + <field + name="server_template_id" + attrs="{'invisible': [('server_template_id', '=', False)]}" + readonly="1" + /> + <field + name="plan_delete_id" + domain="[('state', '=', 'confirmed')]" + context="{'default_server_id': active_id}" + help="Select a flight plan to execute when deleting this server" + /> + </group> + </group> + </page>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_plan_log.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py(3 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_server.py(2 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (3)
356-358: Settingserver_template_idas read-only is appropriate.Marking
server_template_idwithreadonly=Trueensures that the server template remains constant after creation, which is suitable if modifications are not allowed post-creation.
361-366: New fieldplan_delete_idadded correctly.The addition of the
plan_delete_idfield properly links a server to its deletion flight plan, enhancing the server deletion workflow.
381-382: Status options updated appropriately.Adding
"deleting"and"delete_error"statuses improves the tracking of server states during the deletion process.cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_plan_log.py (1)
159-162: Hook method_plan_finishedadded appropriately.The addition of the
_plan_finishedmethod provides a customizable hook for actions upon flight plan completion.cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_server.py (1)
472-492: Test methods added correctly for server deletion scenarios.The test cases
test_server_delete_plan_successandtest_server_delete_plan_erroreffectively verify the server deletion process under success and error conditions.cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
261-267: Verify field definitions in the model.The new fields should have corresponding field definitions in the model class.
Let's verify the field definitions in the model:
✅ Verification successful
Field definitions verified successfully
Both
server_template_idandplan_delete_idare properly defined in the model class with appropriate field types and attributes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check field definitions in the model class # Expected: Find field definitions for server_template_id and plan_delete_id # Search for field definitions rg "server_template_id|plan_delete_id" -A 3 -g "*.py"Length of output: 22878
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_plan_log.py (2)
163-174: Consider adding transaction handling for server deletion.While the deletion logic is correct, consider wrapping the server deletion in a try-except block to handle potential database constraints or cascading deletion issues. This would ensure the status is properly set to "delete_error" if the unlink operation fails.
if plan_status == 0: # And finally delete the server - self.with_context(server_force_delete=True).server_id.unlink() + try: + self.with_context(server_force_delete=True).server_id.unlink() + except Exception as e: + _logger.error("Server deletion failed: %s", str(e)) + self.server_id.status = "delete_error" + return
Line range hint
176-180: Enhance the hook method's documentation.The docstring could be more detailed to help implementers:
- Explain when exactly this hook is triggered (after plan status update but before server deletion).
- Document the available context (self.plan_status, self.server_id, etc.).
- Remove the unnecessary
return Trueas it's not used.def _plan_finished(self): - """Triggered when flightplan in finished - Inherit to implement your own hooks - """ - return True + """Hook method triggered after a flight plan is finished. + + This method is called after updating the plan's status and finish time, + but before any server deletion (if applicable). Override this method + to implement custom logic that should run when a flight plan completes. + + Available context: + - self.plan_status: The final status code of the plan + - self.server_id: The server record + - self.finish_date: When the plan finished + """ + pass
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_plan_log.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_server.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_server.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_plan_log.py (1)
159-160: LGTM! Good addition of the extension point.The hook is correctly placed after updating the plan status, following Odoo's conventions for extensibility.
Execute flight plan when server is deleted. Set "Deleting" status when flight plan is started. Delete server if plan is successful. Set "Delete Error" status when flight plan fails.
ivs-cetmix
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4252-cetmix_tower_server-on_delete_flight_plan
branch
from
886f469 to
8652b65
Compare
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 233708a. Thanks a lot for contributing to cetmix. ❤️ |
CetmixGitDrone
deleted the
14.0-t4252-cetmix_tower_server-on_delete_flight_plan
branch
Execute flight plan when server is deleted.
Set "Deleting" status when flight plan is started. Delete server if plan is successful.
Set "Delete Error" status when flight plan fails.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
UI Changes
These changes provide more robust server management capabilities with improved deletion workflows and error tracking.