Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] cetmix_tower_server: Tests #186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

GabbasovDinar
Copy link
Contributor

@GabbasovDinar GabbasovDinar commented Jan 17, 2025

  • Fix tests falling due to missing variable.

Task: 4273

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Updated SSH connection testing methods in test suite
    • Simplified mock functions for SSH connection checks
    • Modified timeout and connection testing parameters
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined test implementation for SSH connection scenarios
    • Adjusted method signatures and mocking approach in test files

- Fix tests falling due to missing variable.

Task: 4273
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the testing infrastructure for SSH connection checks in the cetmix_tower_server project. Changes are primarily focused on the tests/common.py and tests/test_cetmix_tower.py files, introducing a new timeout parameter and simplifying the mock implementation for SSH connection testing. The modifications aim to enhance the flexibility and simplicity of SSH connection simulation during unit testing.

Changes

File Change Summary
cetmix_tower_server/tests/common.py - Added MagicMock import from unittest.mock
- Updated _get_ssh_client_patch method to include timeout parameter
- Changed return value from True to MagicMock()
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_cetmix_tower.py - Removed mock_server_check_ssh_connection method
- Added new test_ssh_connection method
- Simplified SSH connection test scenarios
- Updated patching mechanism for SSH connection checks

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

needs review, approved

Suggested reviewers

  • ivs-cetmix
  • Aldeigja

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cetmix_tower_server/tests/common.py (1)

221-223: Improved SSH client mocking implementation.

The changes enhance the test infrastructure by:

  1. Adding timeout parameter for testing timeout scenarios
  2. Using MagicMock for more flexible behavior simulation

Consider documenting the expected behavior and methods that can be mocked using the returned MagicMock object, as it will help other developers understand how to use this method effectively in their tests.

cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_cetmix_tower.py (2)

108-109: Improve test function naming and documentation.

The function name and implementation could be more descriptive about the scenario being tested.

-        def test_ssh_connection(this, *args, **kwargs):
-            return {"status": -1}
+        def simulate_ssh_connection_timeout(this, *args, **kwargs):
+            """Simulates an SSH connection timeout by returning error status"""
+            return {"status": -1}

111-123: LGTM! Good test for connection timeout scenario.

The test properly verifies the behavior when SSH connection times out:

  1. Mocks the SSH connection to simulate a timeout
  2. Uses appropriate parameters (attempts=2, wait_time=1) to control the retry behavior
  3. Verifies the expected error code

However, consider adding more test scenarios to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Add tests for:

  1. Invalid server reference
  2. Network errors
  3. Authentication failures
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2ebeda and d6b2cf5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cetmix_tower_server/tests/common.py (2 hunks)
  • cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_cetmix_tower.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: nikola-vlavceski-solisa
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#174
File: cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T08:46:26.793Z
Learning: In cetmix-tower, SSH connection tests focus on behavioral testing using mocks to cover control flow paths (success, timeout, invalid server) rather than integration testing with actual SSH connections. The test implementation in `test_server_check_ssh_connection` uses mock to simulate different scenarios while avoiding actual network connections.
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_cetmix_tower.py (1)
Learnt from: nikola-vlavceski-solisa
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#174
File: cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T08:46:26.793Z
Learning: In cetmix-tower, SSH connection tests focus on behavioral testing using mocks to cover control flow paths (success, timeout, invalid server) rather than integration testing with actual SSH connections. The test implementation in `test_server_check_ssh_connection` uses mock to simulate different scenarios while avoiding actual network connections.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cetmix_tower_server/tests/common.py (1)

3-4: LGTM! Good practice to import MagicMock.

The addition of MagicMock import enhances the test infrastructure's mocking capabilities.

Comment on lines +102 to +106
# Test successful connection
result = self.env["cetmix.tower"].server_check_ssh_connection(
self.server_test_1.reference,
)
self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 0, "SSH connection should be successful.")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Implement proper mocking for SSH connection test

The review comment is valid. The codebase consistently uses mock.patch.object for SSH-related tests, and the suggested implementation aligns with established patterns. The current implementation without mocking could lead to flaky tests and should be updated to use proper test doubles.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify test coverage for successful connection scenario.

The test for successful connection doesn't mock the SSH client behavior, which might lead to flaky tests. Consider using the enhanced MagicMock capabilities to properly simulate a successful connection.

-        result = self.env["cetmix.tower"].server_check_ssh_connection(
-            self.server_test_1.reference,
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 0, "SSH connection should be successful.")
+        def test_successful_ssh_connection(this, *args, **kwargs):
+            return {"status": 0}
+        
+        with patch.object(
+            self.registry["cx.tower.server"], "test_ssh_connection", test_successful_ssh_connection
+        ):
+            result = self.env["cetmix.tower"].server_check_ssh_connection(
+                self.server_test_1.reference,
+            )
+            self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 0, "SSH connection should be successful.")
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find implementation of server_check_ssh_connection
ast-grep --pattern 'def server_check_ssh_connection'

# Look for mock usage in test files
rg "mock\.|patch\." -A 3 --glob "test_*.py"

# Find SSH-related test cases
rg "test.*ssh" --glob "test_*.py"

Length of output: 5784

Copy link
Contributor

@ivs-cetmix ivs-cetmix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

@CetmixGitDrone
Copy link

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 14.0-dev-ocabot-merge-pr-186-by-ivs-cetmix-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@CetmixGitDrone CetmixGitDrone merged commit 4130764 into 14.0-dev Jan 20, 2025
7 checks passed
@CetmixGitDrone
Copy link

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3c3f48a. Thanks a lot for contributing to cetmix. ❤️

@CetmixGitDrone CetmixGitDrone deleted the 14.0-t4273-cetmix_tower_server-fix-test branch January 20, 2025 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants