[charm-dev] bump versions #57
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @sed-i, thanks for the PR. We need to wait for a little while after releasing 1.14 — which we were about to release when we found a couple of regressions — to give people a chance to update Multipass and be able to get the 24.04 alias (that should be more dynamic, but we haven't had a chance yet).
In the meantime, I am not entirely convinced by the "beta" thing. The way I understand it, this blueprint is meant for development of charms, not Juju itself; after all, dev is qualified by charm- in the name. And the description is "A development and testing environment for charmers".
I guess this is another thing that would benefit from parameterization. Until then, how difficult is it to snap refresh after the launch?
|
Agreed @ricab, wrote this down in a motd instead. |
|
Nice, I like that MOTD idea. Let's give it a couple of weeks or so and then we'll update. |
| echo " encounter in you journey!" | ||
| echo | ||
| echo " sudo snap refresh juju --channel=3/beta" | ||
| echo " sudo snap refresh charmcraft --classic --channel=3.x/beta" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like this channel is currently closed. Can you confirm if this really is the intention?
$ sudo snap refresh charmcraft --classic --channel=3.x/beta
charmcraft (3.x/candidate) 3.1.1 from Canonical✓ refreshed
Channel 3.x/beta for charmcraft is closed; temporarily forwarding to 3.x/candidate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Huh. I think it worked yesterday (?), not sure.
Yes, I'll change to candidate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok odd, snap info looks fine. Let's keep at beta?
3.x/stable: –
3.x/candidate: 3.1.1 2024-07-24 (4264) 62MB classic
3.x/beta: ↑
3.x/edge: 3.1.1.post4+g1330582 2024-07-31 (4318) 62MB classic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right, that's what it looks like when the channel is closed, it just forwards to the next "more stable" channel. And that worked fine. If something is later published to beta, the snap will update to that.
Anyway, I am fine with beta. I mainly wanted to be sure that you didn't mean to have candidate or edge instead.
In this PR, bumping: