Rename ods to tods

[isabelle-dr]

ODS was renamed to TODS in June 2024.
This PR renames ODS to TODS so it appears everywhere on the website and there is no confusion.

[github-actions]

Preview url: https://operational-data-standard-78--cal-itp-previews.netlify.app

[isabelle-dr]

@jfabi and @safrazier17 my apologies, I did this before seeing that there is #71 already open for it.

I modified more files here, including index.md which generates the landing page of the site, maybe we can use this one instead?
If you'd rather follow efforts in #71 I can also close this.

[safrazier17]

@isabelle-dr this is great; happy to use this one and close #71

[isabelle-dr]

Okay, could you give me the review here? :)

[jfabi]

Not included in line, but I believe the mkdocs.yml file also needs to be updated, in order to edit the webpage footers:

[safrazier17]

Hey Isabelle, made some requested additions, and added a few of the copy edits that i had on my previous PR into yours.

[jfabi]

@isabelle-dr, would you be able to take another look at this branch when you next have a chance? Thanks!

[isabelle-dr]

@safrazier17 and @jfabi, thank you for the review!

I made the fixes requested and updated mkdocs.yml. Please take another look :)

[isabelle-dr]

@jfabi and @safrazier17 I made the changes requested, please take another look.

[safrazier17]

Looks good to me @isabelle-dr, thank you

[jfabi]

One small clarification to make, but otherwise this is looking very good, thank you!

[jfabi]

Thanks again, @isabelle-dr!

[isabelle-dr]

@jfabi @safrazier17 it seems like I need a review from a maintainer, who would it be?
Also, do you know what is failing in the pre-commit.ci tests?

[safrazier17]

@jfabi @safrazier17 it seems like I need a review from a maintainer, who would it be? Also, do you know what is failing in the pre-commit.ci tests?

@thekaveman I assume that you are one as a repo owner, can you take a look?

[thekaveman]

@jfabi @safrazier17 it seems like I need a review from a maintainer, who would it be? Also, do you know what is failing in the pre-commit.ci tests?

@thekaveman I assume that you are one as a repo owner, can you take a look?

The pre-commit checks are failing for a number of Markdown formatting issues. Nothing looks to be critical, so I leave it to you all if you want to address these or just go with it as-is. I will note that if these aren't fixed at some point, the warnings will continue.

Output:

docs/governance/governance.md:37:3 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:70:20 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:74:66 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-TODS-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:78:47 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:95:5 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:112:60 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-board-of-directors; Actual: #TODS-board-of-directors] [Context: "[TODS Board of Directors](#TODS-board-of-directors)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:118:143 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:119:98 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-manager; Actual: #TODS-manager] [Context: "[TODS Manager](#TODS-manager)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:121:96 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-board-of-directors; Actual: #TODS-board-of-directors] [Context: "[TODS Board](#TODS-board-of-directors)"]
docs/governance/policies/change-management-versioning.md:202:1 MD053/link-image-reference-definitions Link and image reference definitions should be needed [Unused link or image reference definition: "tods-spec"] [Context: "[tods-spec]: ../governance.md#..."]
docs/index.md:73 MD012/no-multiple-blanks Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2]
docs/index.md:78 MD012/no-multiple-blanks Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2]
docs/spec/examples.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "f# Examples"]
docs/spec/revision-history.md:6 MD032/blanks-around-lists Lists should be surrounded by blank lines [Context: "* Removes files `deadheads.txt..."]
docs/spec/revision-history.md:8:1 MD007/ul-indent Unordered list indentation [Expected: 4; Actual: 3]

[safrazier17]

@jfabi @safrazier17 it seems like I need a review from a maintainer, who would it be? Also, do you know what is failing in the pre-commit.ci tests?

@thekaveman I assume that you are one as a repo owner, can you take a look?

The pre-commit checks are failing for a number of Markdown formatting issues. Nothing looks to be critical, so I leave it to you all if you want to address these or just go with it as-is. I will note that if these aren't fixed at some point, the warnings will continue.

Output:

docs/governance/governance.md:37:3 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:70:20 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:74:66 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-TODS-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:78:47 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:95:5 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:112:60 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-board-of-directors; Actual: #TODS-board-of-directors] [Context: "[TODS Board of Directors](#TODS-board-of-directors)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:118:143 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[TODS Specification](#operational-data-standard-tods-specification)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:119:98 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-manager; Actual: #TODS-manager] [Context: "[TODS Manager](#TODS-manager)"]
docs/governance/governance.md:121:96 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Expected: #tods-board-of-directors; Actual: #TODS-board-of-directors] [Context: "[TODS Board](#TODS-board-of-directors)"]
docs/governance/policies/change-management-versioning.md:202:1 MD053/link-image-reference-definitions Link and image reference definitions should be needed [Unused link or image reference definition: "tods-spec"] [Context: "[tods-spec]: ../governance.md#..."]
docs/index.md:73 MD012/no-multiple-blanks Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2]
docs/index.md:78 MD012/no-multiple-blanks Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2]
docs/spec/examples.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "f# Examples"]
docs/spec/revision-history.md:6 MD032/blanks-around-lists Lists should be surrounded by blank lines [Context: "* Removes files `deadheads.txt..."]
docs/spec/revision-history.md:8:1 MD007/ul-indent Unordered list indentation [Expected: 4; Actual: 3]

Thanks @thekaveman. I will merge for now and make a note to fix the MD when I get back from leave