Feat[Storagetool]: Add support of queueOp and journalOp records

[alexander-e1off]

Enhance storage tool to search queueOp and journalOp records (in addition to message records). New option to select record type is introduced:

  -r | --record-type          <record-type>
          record type to search {message|queue-op|journal-op} (default: message)

To search multiple record types, this option should be repeated, e.g. -r message -r queue-op.

In the short form, output of new records looks like the following:

[ header = [ type = QUEUE_OP flags = 0 primaryLeaseId = 2 sequenceNumber = 2 timestamp = 1732618118 ] flags = 0 queueKey = 44D469EF30 appKey = 0000000000 type = CREATION queueUriRecordOffsetWords = 9 ]
[ header = [ type = JOURNAL_OP flags = 0 primaryLeaseId = 2 sequenceNumber = 3 timestamp = 1732618119 ] flags = 0 type = SYNCPOINT syncPointType = REGULAR sequenceNum = 3 primaryNodeId = 0 primaryLeaseId = 2 dataFileOffsetDwords = 5 qlistFileOffsetWords = 47 ]

In the detail form (with option --details), output of new records looks like the following:

=========================================
JOURNAL_OP record, index: 12, offset: 764
    PrimaryLeaseId        : 4
    SequenceNumber        : 1
    Timestamp             : 26NOV2024_11:03:35.000000
    Epoch                 : 1732619015
    JournalOpType         : SYNCPOINT
    SyncPointType         : REGULAR
    SyncPtPrimaryLeaseId  : 0
    SyncPtSequenceNumber  : 1
    PrimaryNodeId         : 4
    DataFileOffsetDwords  : 8

=======================================
QUEUE_OP record, index: 13, offset: 824
    PrimaryLeaseId     : 4
    SequenceNumber     : 2
    Timestamp          : 26NOV2024_11:03:59.000000
    Epoch              : 1732619039
    QueueKey           : 676EC94E89
    QueueUri           : bmq://bmq.test.persistent.fanout/my2
    AppKey             : ** NULL **
    AppId              : ** NULL **
    QueueOpType        : CREATION
    QLIST OffsetWords  : 47

[pniedzielski]

@alexander-e1off, is this ready to be reviewed? It looks like some tests are failing with build errors.

[alexander-e1off]

@alexander-e1off, is this ready to be reviewed? It looks like some tests are failing with build errors.

@pniedzielski, this PR depends on #508 and will be ready for review as soon as #508 is merged. Please review it first. Thanks.

[pniedzielski]

LGTM as far as I can tell pre-rebase. Once you rebase, I'll double check and approve.

[alexander-e1off]

@pniedzielski, I've rebased, so you can double check. Thank you!