-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev #4
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ypriverol has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple configuration files for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
recipe/meta.yaml (1)
Line range hint
24-31
: Consider relaxing version constraints for better compatibilitySeveral dependencies have strict version pins (ms2rescore=3.0.3, deepLC=2.2.38, scipy=1.13.1, protobuf=3.19.6). Consider using more flexible version constraints (e.g., >=) to allow for compatible updates and security patches.
pyproject.toml (1)
Line range hint
33-42
: Consider standardizing dependency version constraintsThe project uses a mix of exact pins (=) and wildcards (*) for dependencies. Consider:
- Using consistent version constraint patterns
- Documenting the rationale for strict pins vs flexible constraints
- Aligning constraint patterns between pyproject.toml and meta.yaml
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
environment.yml
(0 hunks)pyproject.toml
(2 hunks)quantmsrescore/__init__.py
(1 hunks)recipe/meta.yaml
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- environment.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- quantmsrescore/init.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipe/meta.yaml (2)
4-4
: LGTM: Version update is consistent
The version update to "0.0.2" aligns with changes in other project files.
39-39
: LGTM: Additional test command
The added test command helps validate the ms2rescore subcommand functionality.
pyproject.toml (1)
6-6
: LGTM: Version update is consistent
The version update to "0.0.2" matches the version in meta.yaml.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
quantms-rescoring
package to 0.0.2.Bug Fixes
sdrf-pipelines
to streamline the environment setup.Documentation