Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syncing ESP-IDF v5.3 changes #815

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Syncing ESP-IDF v5.3 changes #815

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

atanisoft
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Adding pthread dependency for esp-idf due to not being included by default in all cases
  • more renames of ESP32 -> ESP_PLATFORM, some still remain but are outside the areas of idf v5.3 fixes
  • ADC cleanups based on API changes / deprecations.
  • Fix bootloader CAN RX timeout value not being used.
  • TWAI: When working in single-core mode IPC calls will fail, so skip them.
  • TWAI: ISR discards bus-error status when in error-passive as it counts twice!
  • TWAI: drop TX frames when in error-passive stateu as they will not be sent by the underlying hardware.
  • TWAI: added additional validations to detect TX stuck condition in watchdog.
  • Uninitialized: C++23 fix due to std::aligned_storage deprecation

ref: #739

- Adding pthread dependency for esp-idf due to not being included by default in all cases
- more renames of ESP32 -> ESP_PLATFORM, some still remain but are outside the areas of idf v5.3 fixes
- ADC cleanups based on API changes / deprecations.
- Fix bootloader CAN RX timeout value not being used.
- TWAI: When working in single-core mode IPC calls will fail, so skip them.
- TWAI: ISR discards bus-error status when in error-passive as it counts twice!
- TWAI: drop TX frames when in error-passive stateu as they will not be sent by the underlying hardware.
- TWAI: added additional validations to detect TX stuck condition in watchdog.
- Uninitialized: C++23 fix due to std::aligned_storage deprecation
@atanisoft atanisoft requested a review from balazsracz January 26, 2025 15:23
@atanisoft atanisoft marked this pull request as draft January 26, 2025 15:23
@atanisoft atanisoft marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2025 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant