Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: updates the server startup #45
chore: updates the server startup #45
Changes from 3 commits
2f356d9
b4d2ec2
334a144
b2a466c
fb51d13
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check failure on line 25 in server/server.go
GitHub Actions / lint_test / lint
Check failure on line 83 in server/server.go
GitHub Actions / lint_test / lint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why replace WaitGroup to use channel?
also why is the channel name
ready
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WaitGroup only signals goroutine started, not if server is ready to accept connections, "ready" is used b/c it is clear for the channel's purpose
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but how does it work in the past? we have always been using wg
ask Cursor. it's not a good name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right, WaitGroup works in server setups, but my understanding is the key difference is channels can propagate info while WaitGroup can only signal completion
yes, it is too generic, maybe
listenerReady
is better name