Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: folder with error file for code review and pr description #57

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
87 changes: 87 additions & 0 deletions test/erroneous_code_test.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
import time
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 AI Code Review (Powered by Amazon Bedrock)

Here are my review comments on the code change:

1-87:
Avoid inefficient algorithms and unnecessary computations.

  • The calculate_factorial function uses a recursive approach, which can lead to a stack overflow for large inputs (line 5-8).
  • The find_largest_number function iterates through the entire list, even after finding the largest number (line 11-16).
  • The inefficient_sort function uses the bubble sort algorithm, which has a time complexity of O(n^2) and is inefficient for large lists (line 18-23).
  • The generate_random_numbers function generates a large number of random numbers, which can be computationally expensive and potentially unnecessary (line 46-50).
def calculate_factorial(n):
    result = 1
    for i in range(1, n+1):
        result *= i
    return result

def find_largest_number(numbers):
    largest = float('-inf')
    for num in numbers:
        largest = max(largest, num)
    return largest

def sort_list(arr):
    return sorted(arr)

27-30:
Use consistent naming conventions.

The User class follows a different naming convention (PascalCase) compared to the other functions (snake_case). Consider using a consistent naming convention throughout the codebase for better readability and maintainability.

39-43:
Simplify conditional logic.

The process_data function can be simplified using a ternary operator or a list comprehension, which can make the code more concise and readable.

def process_data(data):
    return [item * 2 if item % 2 == 0 else item * 3 for item in data]

55-55:
Handle edge cases and potential exceptions.

The calculate_average function does not handle the case where the input list is empty, which can lead to a ZeroDivisionError. Consider adding a check for the empty list case or raising an appropriate exception.

def calculate_average(numbers):
    if not numbers:
        return 0  # or raise an exception
    total = sum(numbers)
    count = len(numbers)
    average = total / count
    return average

83-83:
Avoid unnecessary delays.

The time.sleep(5) statement introduces an unnecessary delay of 5 seconds, which can negatively impact the performance and responsiveness of the application. Consider removing this delay or replacing it with a more appropriate mechanism if needed.

import random

def calculate_factorial(n):
if n == 0:
return 1
else:
return n * calculate_factorial(n - 1)

def find_largest_number(numbers):
largest = numbers[0]
for num in numbers:
if num > largest:
largest = num
return largest

def inefficient_sort(arr):
n = len(arr)
for i in range(n):
for j in range(0, n-i-1):
if arr[j] > arr[j+1]:
arr[j], arr[j+1] = arr[j+1], arr[j]
return arr

class User:
def __init__(self, name, age):
self.name = name
self.age = age

def print_user_info(self):
print(f"Name: {self.name}, Age: {self.age}")

def process_data(data):
result = []
for item in data:
if item % 2 == 0:
result.append(item * 2)
else:
result.append(item * 3)
return result

def generate_random_numbers(n):
numbers = []
for i in range(n):
numbers.append(random.randint(1, 100))
return numbers

def calculate_average(numbers):
total = sum(numbers)
count = len(numbers)
average = total / count
return average

def main():
# Inefficient factorial calculation
print(calculate_factorial(20))

# Unnecessary loop for finding largest number
numbers = [3, 7, 2, 9, 1, 5]
print(find_largest_number(numbers))

# Inefficient sorting algorithm
unsorted_list = [64, 34, 25, 12, 22, 11, 90]
print(inefficient_sort(unsorted_list))

# Inconsistent naming convention
user1 = User("John Doe", 30)
user1.print_user_info()

# Redundant if-else structure
data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
print(process_data(data))

# Inefficient random number generation
random_numbers = generate_random_numbers(1000000)
print(f"Generated {len(random_numbers)} random numbers")

# Potential division by zero
empty_list = []
print(calculate_average(empty_list))

# Unnecessary time delay
time.sleep(5)
print("Finished processing after 5 seconds")

if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Loading