Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(costmap_generator, scenario_selector): faster getLinkedParkingLot #7257

Closed

Conversation

maxime-clem
Copy link
Contributor

@maxime-clem maxime-clem commented Jun 4, 2024

Description

Requires autowarefoundation/autoware_common#248

Use the improved getLinkedParkingLot() function so that it does not requiring providing ALL parking lots lanelets

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Interface changes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Jun 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kosuke55 kosuke55 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@maxime-clem maxime-clem deleted the perf/all-parking-lots branch July 10, 2024 02:32
@maxime-clem maxime-clem restored the perf/all-parking-lots branch July 10, 2024 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants