Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logging #152

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

Add logging #152

merged 27 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

sajith
Copy link
Member

@sajith sajith commented Aug 9, 2023

Fixes #59.

@sajith sajith added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 9, 2023
@sajith sajith self-assigned this Aug 9, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 9, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7465848622

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 79.947%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6318436655: -0.6%
Covered Lines: 892
Relevant Lines: 1096

💛 - Coveralls

sajith added 11 commits August 9, 2023 06:44
This is better:

> WARNING sdx_pce.topology.manager:manager.py:225 This port (id:
> urn:ogf:network:sdx:port:sax:B1:1) does not belong to any node in
> the topology, likely a Non-SDX port!

... compared to:

> WARNING root:manager.py:223 This port (id:
> urn:ogf:network:sdx:port:sax:B1:1) does not belong to any node in
> the topology, likely a Non-SDX port!
@sajith sajith marked this pull request as draft August 16, 2023 19:35
@sajith sajith marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 22:08
@sajith sajith requested review from YufengXin and congwang09 January 5, 2024 22:08
@sajith sajith merged commit 9e67d4d into main Jan 9, 2024
11 checks passed
@sajith sajith deleted the 59.logging branch January 9, 2024 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prefer logging to print statements
3 participants