-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: adding optional version to the message object #558
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
docs: adding optional version to the message object #558
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. I'm not approving because, although I'm a maintainer of the repo, I've been completely disconnected from the work it's happening here and I'm not sure these are the files we should be touching 😅 Therefore, leaving it to others who are more engaged.
@IsmaelMartinez looks good Waiting for test to test new property |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@IsmaelMartinez make sure to change the definitions
not the schemas
as they are automatically generated on each release 🙂
You can find the message object here: https://github.com/asyncapi/spec-json-schemas/blob/master/definitions/3.0.0/messageObject.json
Thanks for the review. I will see if I can make those changes later on. 1st time in here so apologies for silly mistakes ;) |
… of the generated schema
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Hi all, I just made the changes. We got an conversation open on the RFC but hopefully we can reach a consensus in the near future. |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
Description
Add optional version to the message object
Part of the asyncapi/spec#1068 RFC 0
Related issue(s)
asyncapi/spec#1068
asyncapi/spec#1069