[AMORO-3387]fix: create table like using mixed_hive

[Aireed]

Why are the changes needed?

Enviroment:
format: mixed_hive
engine: spark3.3
catalog: sparkUnifiedSessionCatalog

bug:
table created by using create table like using mixed_hive is not a mixed_hive table.

spark-sql> create table ctl_demo(id int ,name string, dt string) using mixed_hive partitioned by (dt);
Time taken: 1.137 seconds
spark-sql> show create table ctl_demo;
CREATE TABLE spark_catalog.amoro_v7.ctl_demo (
  id INT,
  name STRING,
  dt STRING)
USING mixed_hive
PARTITIONED BY (dt)
TBLPROPERTIES (
  'base.hive.location-root' = 'hdfs://easyops-cluster/user/warehouse/amoro_v7.db/ctl_demo/hive',
  'base.write.format' = 'parquet',
  'delta.write.format' = 'parquet',
  'flink.max-continuous-empty-commits' = '2147483647',
  'schema.name-mapping.default' = '[ {
  "field-id" : 1,
  "names" : [ "id" ]
}, {
  "field-id" : 2,
  "names" : [ "name" ]
}, {
  "field-id" : 3,
  "names" : [ "dt" ]
} ]',
  'self-optimizing.group' = 'amovo_v7',
  'table.create-timestamp' = '1735817876108',
  'write.metadata.delete-after-commit.enabled' = 'true',
  'write.parquet.compression-codec' = 'zstd')

Time taken: 0.893 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> create table ctl_demo_like like ctl_demo using mixed_hive;
Time taken: 0.501 seconds
spark-sql> show create table ctl_demo_like;
CREATE TABLE amoro_v7.ctl_demo_like (
  id INT,
  name STRING,
  dt STRING)
USING mixed_hive
PARTITIONED BY (dt)

Time taken: 0.103 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql>

Brief change log

• modify provider to mixed_hive
• support like sourceTable without databases

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 27.80%. Comparing base (decd55d) to head (12b2d86).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3387      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     21.64%   27.80%   +6.15%     
- Complexity     2316     3589    +1273     
============================================
  Files           427      599     +172     
  Lines         39751    48597    +8846     
  Branches       5630     6266     +636     
============================================
+ Hits           8605    13510    +4905     
- Misses        30419    34149    +3730     
- Partials        727      938     +211     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	27.80% <ø> (?)
trino	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[baiyangtx]

This implementation may impact the logic of other extensions when multiple extensions are used together.

It is recommended to handle only the scenarios you are concerned with in the case conditions =>

[Aireed]

thanks for your reviews. I remove the provider.isDefined check and return plan directly