Split runtime-transaction crate and reduce SVM dependency

[pgarg66]

Problem

SVM dependency on runtime-transaction can be reduced by splitting relevant code in its own crate.

Summary of Changes

Split compute-budget related code to a new crate compute-budget-instruction.

Fixes #

[pgarg66]

Hey @kevinheavey, do you happen to have the crate name reserved under your username? This PR is getting this error:
https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave/actions/runs/12206772353/job/34056937257?pr=3983#step:7:22

[kevinheavey]

Hey @kevinheavey, do you happen to have the crate name reserved under your username? This PR is getting this error: https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave/actions/runs/12206772353/job/34056937257?pr=3983#step:7:22

Yes I do. I've sent an ownership invitation to anza-team now so @yihau can accept and you can use it for this PR

[pgarg66]

Hey @kevinheavey, do you happen to have the crate name reserved under your username? This PR is getting this error: https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave/actions/runs/12206772353/job/34056937257?pr=3983#step:7:22

Yes I do. I've sent an ownership invitation to anza-team now so @yihau can accept and you can use it for this PR

Thank you!

[apfitzge]

Thanks for picking this up @pgarg66! Left a couple last comments about Clone and FrozenABI.

With this split, I can now:

• Add compute_budget_limits to SVMMessage trait
  • default implementation calls process_compute_budget_instructions
  • override for structs implementing StaticMeta

This will let SVM be slightly more efficient, since we can use cached-metadata to get the compute-budget instructions quickly, instead of re-calculating. Main thing getting in the way of doing this previously was just the code organization - which this PR solves!

[tao-stones]

lgtm - thanks for doing it

[apfitzge]

Thanks for cleaning everything up!