Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set read_consultation_principles to true for all post publication consultation editions #9840

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

ryanb-gds
Copy link
Contributor

When the validation requiring publishers to confirm that they have considered the consultation principles was introduced in 797909f, we did not backdate this to existing consultations. This means that some consultations cannot be withdrawn, unwithdrawn or unpublished because they are not technically valid, despite being public on GOV.UK. This data migration retroactively confirms that all post-publication consultations have considered the consultation principles.

Trello: https://trello.com/c/nf4GMMi7

…sultation editions

When the validation requiring publishers to confirm that they have considered the consultation principles was introduced in 797909f, we did not backdate this to existing consultations. This means that some consultations cannot be withdrawn, unwithdrawn or unpublished because they are not technically valid, despite being public on GOV.UK. This data migration retroactively confirms that all post-publication consultations have considered the consultation principles.
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work! ⭐

@ryanb-gds ryanb-gds merged commit d5786bc into main Jan 23, 2025
20 checks passed
@ryanb-gds ryanb-gds deleted the retroactively-confirm-consultation-principles branch January 23, 2025 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants