Website backend model fix #4020
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request encompasses a range of modifications across various files in the project. Key changes include the transition of multiple image and file fields to Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #4020 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 11.73% 11.72% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 114 114
Lines 15330 15378 +48
Branches 319 327 +8
===========================================
+ Hits 1799 1803 +4
- Misses 13531 13575 +44 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0017_auto_20241206_1907.py (1)
62-63: Use logger instead of print statements for error loggingIt's better to use
logger.errorinstead ofApply this diff to update the error handling:
- print(f"Failed to process Session ID {session.id}: {e}") + logger.error(f"Failed to process Session ID {session.id}: {e}")src/website/apps/event/migrations/0013_auto_20241206_1317.py (2)
63-64: Use logger instead of print statements for error loggingReplacing
logger.errorenhances error tracking and integrates with the application's logging system.Apply this diff:
- print(f"Failed to process Program ID {program.id}: {e}") + logger.error(f"Failed to process Program ID {program.id}: {e}")
73-74: Use logger instead of print statements for error loggingConsistent logging practices suggest using
logger.errorfor error messages instead ofApply this diff:
- print(f"Failed to process Session ID {session.id}: {e}") + logger.error(f"Failed to process Session ID {session.id}: {e}")src/website/apps/event/admin.py (1)
31-55: Abstract common code to reduce duplication in preview and download methodsThe methods
preview_logo,download_link, andpreview_event_imageshare similar logic for handling media previews and error logging. Consider creating a helper function to handle this logic, which will improve maintainability and readability.For example, you can create a helper method:
def render_media_preview(self, obj, media_field, media_type, style, alt_text): if getattr(obj, media_field) and hasattr(getattr(obj, media_field), 'url'): try: return format_html( f'<{media_type} src="{{}}" style="{style}" alt="{alt_text}"/>', getattr(obj, media_field).url ) except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Error loading {media_field} for '{obj}': {e}") return f"Error loading {media_type}." elif isinstance(getattr(obj, media_field), str) and getattr(obj, media_field): try: return format_html( f'<{media_type} src="{{}}" style="{style}" alt="{alt_text}"/>', getattr(obj, media_field) ) except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Error loading {media_field} path for '{obj}': {e}") return f"Error loading {media_type}." return f"No {media_type} uploaded."Then update your methods to use this helper:
def preview_logo(self, obj): return self.render_media_preview( obj, 'partner_logo', 'img', "max-height: 100px; max-width: 150px;", "Partner Logo" ) def download_link(self, obj): # Adjust as needed for download links pass def preview_event_image(self, obj): return self.render_media_preview( obj, 'event_image', 'img', "max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;", "Event Image" )Also applies to: 66-85, 148-172
src/website/core/settings.py (1)
199-199: Consider replacing print statements with logging for improved maintainabilityUsing
loggingmodule would provide better control over log levels and outputs, enhancing the application's maintainability and scalability.Also applies to: 211-211, 261-263
src/website/apps/cleanair/models.py (1)
327-327: Refine the__str__method forResourceFilefor clearer representationReturning the file URL in the
__str__method may not provide meaningful information in contexts like the Django admin or logs. Consider returning theresource_summaryor another descriptive attribute to enhance readability.Suggested change:
def __str__(self): - return self.file.url if self.file else "No File" + return self.resource_summary or "Resource File"src/website/templates/admin/base_site.html (1)
4-6: Consider adding a fallback for the Quill CSS.While using CDN is good for performance, consider adding a fallback mechanism in case the CDN is unavailable:
<link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/quill.snow.css" rel="stylesheet" + onerror="this.onerror=null;this.href='{% static 'admin/css/quill.snow.css' %}';" />src/website/apps/highlights/serializers.py (1)
35-37: Enhance the docstring for better clarity.The docstring could be more descriptive to help future maintainers understand the CloudinaryField integration.
Consider expanding it like this:
- """ - Return the secure URL for the image. - """ + """ + Return the secure URL for the image from Cloudinary. + + Returns: + str: The secure Cloudinary URL if image exists, None otherwise. + """src/website/apps/team/admin.py (1)
34-35: Consider making image dimensions configurable.While the current implementation works, hardcoding dimensions directly in the template string makes it less maintainable.
Consider moving dimensions to class-level constants:
class MemberAdmin(nested_admin.NestedModelAdmin): + IMAGE_PREVIEW_WIDTH = 100 + IMAGE_PREVIEW_HEIGHT = 200 + def image_tag(self, obj): if obj.picture: return format_html( - '<img src="{}" width="100" height="200" style="object-fit: contain;" />', + '<img src="{}" width="{}" height="{}" style="object-fit: contain;" />', - obj.get_picture_url() + obj.get_picture_url(), + self.IMAGE_PREVIEW_WIDTH, + self.IMAGE_PREVIEW_HEIGHT )src/website/apps/highlights/models.py (1)
Line range hint
36-42: Add error handling in delete methodThe delete method should handle potential Cloudinary deletion failures gracefully.
def delete(self, *args, **kwargs): """ Automatically delete the image from Cloudinary when the highlight is deleted. """ if self.image: - self.image.delete(save=False) + try: + self.image.delete(save=False) + except Exception as e: + # Log the error but continue with model deletion + import logging + logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) + logger.error(f"Failed to delete image from Cloudinary: {str(e)}") super().delete(*args, **kwargs)src/website/apps/board/models.py (1)
28-30: Consider caching the Cloudinary URLThe
get_picture_urlmethod could benefit from caching to reduce API calls to Cloudinary.def get_picture_url(self): if self.picture: - return self.picture.url # Cloudinary provides the actual URL of the uploaded image + from django.core.cache import cache + cache_key = f'board_member_picture_url_{self.id}' + cached_url = cache.get(cache_key) + if cached_url is None: + cached_url = self.picture.url + cache.set(cache_key, cached_url, timeout=3600) # Cache for 1 hour + return cached_url return Nonesrc/website/apps/team/models.py (1)
11-16: Consider creating a base CloudinaryField configurationSimilar CloudinaryField configurations are repeated across models. Consider creating a common configuration.
Create a new utility module
utils/cloudinary.py:from cloudinary.models import CloudinaryField def get_team_cloudinary_field(folder_path, **kwargs): return CloudinaryField( folder=f"website/uploads/{folder_path}", resource_type="image", allowed_formats=['png', 'jpg', 'jpeg', 'webp'], transformation={'quality': 'auto:good'}, **kwargs )Then use it across models:
-picture = CloudinaryField( - folder="website/uploads/team/members", - resource_type="image", - null=True, - blank=True -) +from utils.cloudinary import get_team_cloudinary_field +picture = get_team_cloudinary_field( + 'team/members', + null=True, + blank=True +)src/website/apps/africancities/admin.py (1)
46-50: Robust null handling with room for improvementThe null check effectively prevents internal server errors, addressing the PR's main objective. The code is secure against XSS through
format_html.Consider adding error logging for cases where
country_flagis unexpectedly null to help track potential data integrity issues.def flag_preview(self, obj): width, height = 60, 40 from django.utils.html import format_html + from django.utils.log import getLogger + logger = getLogger(__name__) if obj.country_flag: return format_html(f'<img src="{obj.get_country_flag_url()}" width="{width}" height="{height}" />') + logger.warning(f"Missing country flag for country: {obj.country_name}") return '-'src/website/apps/publications/models.py (1)
18-23: Consider adding resource type validation.The CloudinaryField configuration looks good, but consider adding validation to ensure only appropriate file types are uploaded.
resource_file = CloudinaryField( folder="website/uploads/publications/files", resource_type="raw", + allowed_formats=['pdf', 'doc', 'docx'], # Add appropriate formats null=True, blank=True, )src/website/apps/press/models.py (1)
55-61: Consider adding error handling in the delete methodWhile the delete implementation correctly cleans up Cloudinary resources, it might benefit from error handling to gracefully handle Cloudinary API failures.
def delete(self, *args, **kwargs): if self.publisher_logo: - cloudinary.uploader.destroy( - self.publisher_logo.public_id, invalidate=True) + try: + cloudinary.uploader.destroy( + self.publisher_logo.public_id, invalidate=True) + except cloudinary.exceptions.Error as e: + # Log the error but continue with deletion + print(f"Failed to delete Cloudinary resource: {e}") super().delete(*args, **kwargs)src/website/apps/partners/admin.py (2)
44-47: Consider making image previews responsiveWhile the current implementation works, fixed dimensions might not be optimal for all logo sizes. Consider using CSS classes for more flexible image handling.
return format_html( - '<img src="{}" width="65" height="50" style="object-fit:contain;" />', + '<img src="{}" style="max-width:65px; max-height:50px; width:auto; height:auto; object-fit:contain;" />', escape(obj.partner_logo.url), )
57-60: Apply consistent image preview stylingFor consistency, apply the same responsive styling approach to the image preview method.
return format_html( - '<img src="{}" width="120" height="80" style="object-fit:cover;" />', + '<img src="{}" style="max-width:120px; max-height:80px; width:auto; height:auto; object-fit:cover;" />', escape(obj.partner_image.url), )src/website/utils/validators.py (1)
28-32: Consider using constants for size limitsThe magic number for file size limit could be moved to a constant at module level for better maintainability.
Add at the top of the file:
IMAGE_MAX_SIZE = 8 * 1024 * 1024 # 8 MB FILE_MAX_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024 # 10 MBThen use these constants in the validation functions.
src/website/requirements.txt (1)
34-37: Clarify the need for Flask dependenciesThe addition of Flask-related packages (
Flask,Flask-Cors,Flask-Migrate,Flask-SQLAlchemy) alongside Django is unusual. This might lead to maintenance complexity.Consider:
- If Flask is needed for a specific component, consider isolating it as a separate microservice
- If not needed, remove Flask-related dependencies to reduce complexity
Also applies to: 79-79
src/website/apps/cleanair/admin.py (2)
18-21: Good addition of logging, consider configuring log levels.The addition of logging for error handling is a good practice. However, consider configuring the log level explicitly for better control over logging output.
import logging # Configure logger logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) +logger.setLevel(logging.ERROR) # Set explicit log level
130-135: Consider creating a mixin for image preview functionality.The
logo_previewandimage_previewmethods share identical logic. Consider creating a mixin to reduce code duplication and standardize image handling:class ImagePreviewMixin: def get_image_preview(self, image_field, description): if image_field: from django.utils.html import escape url = escape(image_field.url) height = 100 return format_html('<img src="{}" height="{}" />', url, height) return "" class PartnerAdmin(ImagePreviewMixin, admin.ModelAdmin): def logo_preview(self, obj): return self.get_image_preview(obj.partner_logo, 'Logo') logo_preview.short_description = 'Logo' class PersonAdmin(ImagePreviewMixin, admin.ModelAdmin): def image_preview(self, obj): return self.get_image_preview(obj.picture, 'Picture') image_preview.short_description = 'Picture'Also applies to: 147-152
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (13)
src/website/assets/website/uploads/events/files/MARTIN_LEAVE_HANDOVER_REPORT_25th_Feb_-_5th_March_2024.pdfis excluded by!**/*.pdfsrc/website/assets/website/uploads/events/images/chuttersnap-aEnH4hJ_Mrs-unsplash.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/assets/website/uploads/events/images/rachel-coyne-U7HLzMO4SIY-unsplash.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/assets/website/uploads/events/logos/checkme.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/assets/website/uploads/events/logos/testimage.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/Screenshot_2024-08-02_at_11.43.19_xg5gj6_rkgg3e.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/checkme.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/checkme_AfSzfyV.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/checkme_gcuTfOv.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/rachel-coyne-U7HLzMO4SIY-unsplash.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/images/test2_TDMKon1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/website/website/uploads/events/logos/testimage.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsrc/website/website/uploads/events/logos/testimage_yJ3OAJe.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpg
📒 Files selected for processing (56)
src/website/apps/africancities/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/africancities/migrations/0011_alter_africancountry_country_flag_alter_image_image.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/africancities/models.py(7 hunks)src/website/apps/africancities/serializers.py(2 hunks)src/website/apps/board/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/board/migrations/0007_alter_boardmember_picture.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/board/models.py(2 hunks)src/website/apps/board/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/admin.py(4 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0015_alter_cleanairresource_resource_file_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0016_alter_engagement_forum_event_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0017_auto_20241206_1907.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/models.py(9 hunks)src/website/apps/cleanair/serializers.py(6 hunks)src/website/apps/event/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0011_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0012_alter_program_program_details_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0013_auto_20241206_1317.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0014_alter_event_background_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0015_alter_event_background_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0016_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0017_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/migrations/0018_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/event/models.py(8 hunks)src/website/apps/event/serializers.py(7 hunks)src/website/apps/event/urls.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/externalteams/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/externalteams/migrations/0007_alter_externalteammember_picture.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/externalteams/models.py(2 hunks)src/website/apps/externalteams/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/highlights/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/highlights/migrations/0011_alter_highlight_image.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/highlights/models.py(3 hunks)src/website/apps/highlights/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/partners/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0007_alter_partner_partner_image_and_more.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/partners/models.py(5 hunks)src/website/apps/partners/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/press/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/press/migrations/0011_alter_press_publisher_logo.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/press/models.py(3 hunks)src/website/apps/press/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/publications/admin.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/publications/migrations/0011_alter_publication_resource_file.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/publications/models.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/publications/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/team/admin.py(3 hunks)src/website/apps/team/migrations/0007_alter_member_picture.py(1 hunks)src/website/apps/team/models.py(3 hunks)src/website/apps/team/serializers.py(1 hunks)src/website/core/settings.py(7 hunks)src/website/requirements.txt(1 hunks)src/website/static/admin/js/admin_dark_mode.js(0 hunks)src/website/templates/admin/base_site.html(2 hunks)src/website/utils/fields.py(3 hunks)src/website/utils/validators.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/website/static/admin/js/admin_dark_mode.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- src/website/apps/publications/admin.py
- src/website/apps/externalteams/serializers.py
- src/website/apps/event/urls.py
- src/website/apps/board/migrations/0007_alter_boardmember_picture.py
- src/website/apps/highlights/admin.py
- src/website/apps/event/migrations/0012_alter_program_program_details_and_more.py
- src/website/apps/press/admin.py
- src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0016_alter_engagement_forum_event_and_more.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
src/website/utils/validators.py
24-26: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
53-55: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
src/website/utils/fields.py
32-32: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
🔇 Additional comments (47)
src/website/apps/event/models.py (1)
93-94: Avoid overriding delete without calling super().delete() properly
When overriding the delete method, ensure that you call super().delete(*args, **kwargs) after your custom logic to maintain the deletion behavior of Django models.
Please confirm that super().delete(*args, **kwargs) is correctly called after the custom deletion logic in each delete method.
Also applies to: 203-204, 240-241
src/website/apps/team/migrations/0007_alter_member_picture.py (1)
1-19: Migration correctly updates picture field to CloudinaryField
The migration updates the picture field to use CloudinaryField, aligning with the changes in the model. This allows for efficient storage and retrieval of images via Cloudinary.
src/website/apps/press/migrations/0011_alter_press_publisher_logo.py (1)
1-19: Migration successfully alters publisher_logo to use CloudinaryField
This migration alters the publisher_logo field to CloudinaryField, ensuring consistent media handling across the application.
src/website/apps/publications/migrations/0011_alter_publication_resource_file.py (1)
1-19: Migration properly updates resource_file field to CloudinaryField
The migration modifies the resource_file field to utilize CloudinaryField, enhancing file management by leveraging Cloudinary's services.
src/website/apps/board/serializers.py (1)
20-22: LGTM! Clean and efficient implementation
The updated get_picture_url method is well-implemented:
- Properly handles null cases
- Leverages Cloudinary's built-in URL generation
- Removes unnecessary complexity
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the model implementations to ensure consistent URL handling.
URL handling is consistent across the codebase
The implementation in BoardMemberSerializer.get_picture_url follows the established pattern in the codebase:
- Most serializers delegate to their model's
get_picture_urlmethod - Direct implementations consistently check
obj.pictureand returnurlorNone - All implementations properly leverage Cloudinary's URL generation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency in picture URL handling across serializers
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_picture_url(self, obj):
$$$
'
Length of output: 1458
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the model implementations for picture URL handling
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_picture_url(self):
$$$
'
Length of output: 1205
src/website/apps/publications/serializers.py (2)
10-19: LGTM! Clean field formatting.
The multi-line field formatting improves readability and maintainability.
22-27: Verify the removal of environment-specific logic.
The simplified URL retrieval looks good and aligns with Cloudinary's URL handling. However, let's verify that all resource files are properly migrated to Cloudinary to ensure this change won't cause issues.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of the migration files to understand the changes made to the resource_file field.
Migration to Cloudinary is complete and properly implemented
The code changes are safe based on the following evidence:
- The latest migration (0011) shows a clean transition to Cloudinary's native
CloudinaryField - The model properly configures the field with
folder="website/uploads/publications/files"andresource_type="raw" - The model includes proper cleanup in its
deletemethod using Cloudinary's API - No local file storage patterns were found in the codebase
- The serializer's simplified URL retrieval aligns perfectly with the current Cloudinary implementation
The removal of environment-specific logic is appropriate as Cloudinary's field handles all the URL generation internally.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any local file paths still referenced in the database
# and verify Cloudinary URL patterns in resource_file fields
# Search for potential file path patterns that might indicate local storage
rg -i "(/media/|/static/|file://)" src/website/apps/publications/
# Check if there are any migration files that might need to be run
fd -e py -p ".*migrations.*" src/website/apps/publications/
Length of output: 1069
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of migration files related to resource_file changes
for file in $(fd -e py -p ".*migrations.*alter.*resource_file.*" src/website/apps/publications/); do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
echo -e "\n\n"
done
# Also check the model definition
rg -l "resource_file" src/website/apps/publications/models.py
cat src/website/apps/publications/models.py
Length of output: 10123
src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0007_alter_partner_partner_image_and_more.py (1)
14-23: Verify data migration safety for partner images.
The migration to CloudinaryField looks good. However, we should ensure that:
- Existing partner images and logos are properly transferred to Cloudinary
- The application handles the transition period gracefully
Consider adding a data migration script to handle the transfer of existing files to Cloudinary if not already implemented.
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show the Partner model structure but we need to understand:
- The previous field types before CloudinaryField
- Any existing data migration logic
- The sequence of migrations leading to this change
This will help us verify if there's proper data migration handling in place.
From the previous results, we can see that the fields started as CustomImageField and went through several migrations. We need to examine:
- The exact field type right before the Cloudinary migration
- Whether there are any data migration operations between the transitions
- The specific changes in migration 0006 that preceded this Cloudinary migration
This will help us understand if there's any risk of data loss during the transition.
Migration path for partner images looks safe
The migration sequence shows a well-planned transition to Cloudinary:
- Started with CustomImageField (with local file storage)
- Transitioned to CustomCloudinaryField in migration 0006 (with validators and defaults)
- Finally moved to CloudinaryField in 0007 (standard field)
This is a safe migration because:
- Migration 0006 already moved the storage to Cloudinary using a custom field
- Current migration (0007) simply switches to the standard CloudinaryField
- Both fields maintain the same null/blank/max_length parameters
- No data migration is needed as the storage was already moved in the previous step
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing partner records and their image fields
# Check for any Partner models with existing image/logo fields
rg -A 5 "class Partner" src/website/apps/partners/models.py
# Look for any custom save methods or signals that might handle file uploads
rg -l "def save" src/website/apps/partners/models.py
rg -l "signals" src/website/apps/partners/
Length of output: 632
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any existing migration files that might handle data transfer
fd "migrations" src/website/apps/partners/ --exec ls -la {}
# Check for any data migrations or file handling in previous migrations
rg -l "cloudinary|ImageField|FileField" src/website/apps/partners/migrations/
# Check the model's previous state
rg "partner_image|partner_logo" src/website/apps/partners/migrations/
Length of output: 3744
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the initial migration and the one right before 0007
cat src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0001_initial.py
cat src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0006_alter_partner_partner_image_and_more.py
# Also check for any data migration operations in these files
rg "operations = \[" -A 10 src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0006_alter_partner_partner_image_and_more.py
rg "operations = \[" -A 10 src/website/apps/partners/migrations/0007_alter_partner_partner_image_and_more.py
Length of output: 4822
src/website/apps/africancities/migrations/0011_alter_africancountry_country_flag_alter_image_image.py (1)
14-23: Consistent CloudinaryField implementation across models.
The migration follows the same pattern as the partner migration, which is good for consistency. The field parameters are appropriate for image storage.
Consider documenting the Cloudinary migration pattern in the project's documentation to maintain consistency for future model additions.
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show multiple CustomImageField usages across different apps, but we need to verify the current state of the models (not just migrations) to ensure we're seeing the complete picture of the Cloudinary migration progress.
CloudinaryField migration is consistent and complete across the codebase
The migration follows the established pattern of transitioning from CustomImageField/CustomCloudinaryField to CloudinaryField. The current models in the codebase consistently use CloudinaryField with appropriate parameters, as evidenced by the model definitions:
- africancities/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for
imageandcountry_flag - team/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for
picture - press/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for
publisher_logo - event/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for all image fields
- cleanair/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for all media fields
- board/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for
picture - highlights/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for
image - partners/models.py: Uses CloudinaryField for both image fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of Cloudinary implementation across the codebase
# Check for any remaining ImageField usage that might need migration
rg "ImageField" src/website/apps/
# Look for any custom image handling logic that might need updating
rg -l "upload_to" src/website/apps/
Length of output: 13364
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the models.py files to understand the current state of image fields
# and verify if all image fields are consistently using CloudinaryField
# Search for current model definitions with image fields
rg "class.*(?:Image|.*image.*|.*flag.*|.*logo.*|.*picture.*)" -A 10 src/website/apps/
# Check for CloudinaryField usage in models
rg "CloudinaryField" src/website/apps/
Length of output: 40602
src/website/apps/press/serializers.py (2)
11-20: LGTM! Clean and consistent field declarations.
The field declarations are well-organized and use consistent double quotes, improving code readability.
24-29: Simplified URL retrieval looks good.
The streamlined approach to URL retrieval aligns well with Cloudinary integration. The removal of environment-specific handling reduces complexity while maintaining functionality.
src/website/templates/admin/base_site.html (1)
17-22: Verify the removal of dark mode functionality.
The script changes look good, but I notice the dark mode functionality has been removed. Please confirm if this was intentional and whether it affects user experience.
src/website/apps/team/serializers.py (2)
17-27: Excellent improvement in field specification.
The transition from __all__ to explicit field listing is a significant improvement:
- Provides better control over exposed data
- Makes field changes more intentional
- Improves code maintainability
30-33: Well-documented method with clear purpose.
The added docstring clearly describes the method's purpose. The implementation aligns well with the Cloudinary integration objectives of this PR.
src/website/apps/highlights/serializers.py (1)
39-40: LGTM! Clean and efficient implementation.
The simplified URL retrieval logic reduces complexity and potential points of failure by leveraging CloudinaryField's built-in secure URL generation.
src/website/apps/team/admin.py (1)
33-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate format_html import.
The format_html is already imported at the module level (line 4), making the local import redundant.
Remove the duplicate import:
def image_tag(self, obj):
if obj.picture:
- return format_html(
+ return format_html(
'<img src="{}" width="100" height="200" style="object-fit: contain;" />',
obj.get_picture_url()
)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/website/apps/highlights/models.py (1)
15-16: Good practice using string-based model reference
Using string-based reference for the Tag model ('Tag') instead of direct reference helps prevent circular import issues and follows Django best practices.
src/website/apps/team/models.py (1)
29-31: Verify Cloudinary URL security
The comment indicates CloudinaryField handles secure URLs, but let's verify the security settings.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the CloudinaryField implementation and related configurations to verify the security of URL handling. The previous search found an insecure URL pattern in a different file, but we need to specifically verify how CloudinaryField handles URLs in the team model context.
The previous search revealed extensive use of CloudinaryField throughout the codebase, including a custom implementation. Let's examine the CustomCloudinaryField class and its URL handling to verify the security claims.
CloudinaryField URL security is verified
The codebase analysis confirms that CloudinaryField handles URLs securely:
- The field inherits from Cloudinary's official CloudinaryField which automatically provides HTTPS URLs
- The custom implementation (CustomCloudinaryField) doesn't override any URL handling, preserving the secure URL generation from the parent class
- All image storage is managed through Cloudinary's infrastructure which enforces HTTPS by default
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for secure URL patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking for insecure URL patterns..."
rg -l "(?i)http://" --type py
# Check Cloudinary configuration
echo "Checking Cloudinary configuration..."
rg -A 5 "cloudinary\.config\(" --type py
Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CloudinaryField implementation and its URL handling
echo "Checking CloudinaryField usage and configuration..."
rg -A 5 "CloudinaryField" --type py
# Check for any URL-related settings or configurations
echo "Checking settings files for Cloudinary configuration..."
fd "settings.*\.py" --exec rg -A 5 "CLOUDINARY" {}
# Check the specific model implementation
echo "Checking the team model implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class.*Team" --type py
Length of output: 101813
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CustomCloudinaryField implementation to verify URL security
echo "Checking CustomCloudinaryField implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class CustomCloudinaryField" --type py
# Check for any URL-related methods or configurations in utils
echo "Checking URL handling in utils..."
rg -A 5 "def.*url" --type py src/website/utils/
Length of output: 1824
src/website/apps/partners/serializers.py (3)
19-27: LGTM! Clean and consistent field formatting.
The fields list is well-organized and properly indented, making it easy to read and maintain.
39-44: Consistent URL handling pattern applied.
The same robust URL handling pattern is correctly applied to partner images as well.
31-36: Improved URL handling for partner logo.
The simplified URL retrieval is more robust and aligns with Cloudinary's URL handling. However, let's verify that all partner logos are properly migrated to Cloudinary.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the partner logo implementation to understand the URL handling better.
Partner logo implementation is properly using Cloudinary across the codebase
The URL handling is consistent and secure. All partner logo fields are properly defined as CloudinaryField with appropriate folder configurations, and the URL retrieval is uniformly implemented across all relevant modules (partners, cleanair, and event apps). The simplified URL retrieval in the reviewed code aligns perfectly with the existing implementation pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify partner logo URLs in the database
# Check if there are any non-Cloudinary URLs still in use
rg -g "*.py" "partner_logo.*\.(url|path)"
Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the model definition and field type for partner_logo
ast-grep --pattern 'partner_logo = $_'
# Check for any URL processing or validation related to partner_logo
rg -g "*.py" -B 2 -A 2 "partner_logo.*\.(url|path)"
Length of output: 3578
src/website/apps/event/migrations/0018_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py (1)
14-18: Well-structured migration for Cloudinary integration.
The migration properly configures CloudinaryField for all media fields with consistent attributes. However, let's verify the migration safety:
- All fields are nullable and have defaults, which is good for backward compatibility
- The verbose_name is appropriately set for each field type
Also applies to: 19-23, 24-28, 29-33
✅ Verification successful
Migration to CloudinaryField is complete and safe
The verification confirms that:
- All media fields in the Event model are properly using CloudinaryField
- No legacy FileField or ImageField usage remains
- No Django file storage imports are present
- The migration maintains consistent field configurations across all media fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if there are any direct file system references remaining
# This helps ensure complete migration to Cloudinary
# Check for any remaining file system storage configurations
rg -g "*.py" "FileSystemStorage|MEDIA_ROOT|MEDIA_URL" src/website/apps/event/
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the migration safety more comprehensively
# Check for any model fields that might still be using FileField or ImageField
ast-grep --pattern 'class Event($$$):
$$$
$_ = models.FileField($$$)
$$$'
ast-grep --pattern 'class Event($$$):
$$$
$_ = models.ImageField($$$)
$$$'
# Check for any storage-related imports
rg -g "*.py" "^from django.core.files" src/website/apps/event/
# Check the model definition to ensure all media fields are using CloudinaryField
rg -g "*.py" "CloudinaryField|FileField|ImageField" src/website/apps/event/models.py
Length of output: 551
src/website/apps/externalteams/models.py (2)
28-32: Clear documentation and simplified URL handling.
The URL retrieval is properly simplified, and the documentation clearly explains the behavior. However, let's ensure consistent error handling across all similar methods.
✅ Verification successful
URL handling is consistent across the codebase
The URL retrieval pattern in the reviewed code follows the established pattern used throughout the codebase. All image-related URL methods:
- Consistently check for the existence of the image field before accessing the URL
- Use Cloudinary's built-in secure URL functionality
- Include clear documentation explaining the behavior
- Handle null cases appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent URL handling patterns
# This helps ensure standardized approach across the codebase
# Check URL retrieval patterns
rg -g "*.py" "def get_.*_url.*cloudinary" src/website/apps/
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's broaden our search to find URL-related methods and patterns
# First, let's look for URL-related methods in Python files
rg -g "*.py" "def.*url" -B 2 -A 2 src/website/apps/
# Also search for Cloudinary-related patterns
rg -g "*.py" "cloudinary" -B 2 -A 2 src/website/apps/
# Look for similar picture/image URL handling patterns
rg -g "*.py" "picture.*url|image.*url" -B 2 -A 2 src/website/apps/
Length of output: 48570
10-15: Well-structured CloudinaryField configuration.
The CloudinaryField is properly configured with:
- Organized folder structure
- Appropriate resource type
- Proper null/blank handling
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden it to understand the CloudinaryField usage patterns and media handling configurations across the codebase. This will help us verify the consistency of the folder structure and configuration.
CloudinaryField configuration follows consistent patterns across the application
The folder structure for CloudinaryField is well-organized and follows a consistent pattern across different apps:
- Team-related images:
website/uploads/team/* - Event-related files:
website/uploads/events/* - Partner-related images:
website/uploads/partners/* - Press-related files:
website/uploads/press/* - Publications:
website/uploads/publications/* - Highlights:
website/uploads/highlights/* - CleanAir:
website/uploads/cleanair/*
The implementation in externalteams/models.py aligns perfectly with this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent folder structure across the application
# This helps ensure standardized media organization
# Check folder patterns in CloudinaryField configurations
rg -g "*.py" "CloudinaryField.*folder=" src/website/apps/
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for CloudinaryField usage
rg -g "*.py" "CloudinaryField" src/website/apps/ -B 1 -A 3
# Also search for any media-related configurations
rg -g "*.py" "folder.*upload" src/website/apps/
Length of output: 65644
src/website/apps/africancities/serializers.py (2)
44-44: Ensure consistent URL handling across models
The change aligns with the simplified URL retrieval pattern. Let's verify that all image-related models follow this pattern consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of these URL retrieval methods to ensure consistency.
URL handling pattern is consistent across the codebase
The simplified URL retrieval pattern is consistently implemented across the application. The serializers are correctly delegating to their respective model methods, following the same pattern of direct returns. This maintains a clean separation of concerns where models handle URL generation and serializers simply proxy these calls.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all URL retrieval methods
rg -g '*.py' 'def get_.*_url.*:'
Length of output: 2005
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation patterns of URL retrieval methods
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_$_url($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for direct return patterns
rg -g '*.py' -B1 'return.*\.(get_.*_url)\(\)'
Length of output: 1217
9-9: Verify the model's get_image_url implementation
The simplified URL retrieval assumes that obj.get_image_url() returns a secure Cloudinary URL. Let's verify this assumption.
✅ Verification successful
The previous ast-grep pattern might have been too strict. Let's try a broader search to understand how the image URL is handled in the codebase.
The search results show extensive use of CloudinaryField across the codebase, but let's specifically verify the africancities Image model implementation to confirm how it handles the image URL.
We found that the model uses CloudinaryField, but let's see the complete implementation to verify how get_image_url is handled.
Verified: Image URL handling is secure through Cloudinary
The model implementation confirms that:
- The image field uses CloudinaryField with proper configuration
- The get_image_url method correctly returns the secure URL via
image.url - Cloudinary's built-in URL handling ensures HTTPS by default
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the get_image_url implementation in models
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_image_url(self):
$$$
}'
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for get_image_url using ripgrep
rg "get_image_url" -A 5
# Also search for any CloudinaryField or similar cloud storage fields
rg "CloudinaryField|ImageField" -A 2
Length of output: 77416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the africancities model implementation
rg -A 5 "class Image.*africancities"
# Also check for the image field definition
rg "image = .*Field" src/website/apps/africancities/models.py
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the full Image model implementation
rg -A 15 "class Image" src/website/apps/africancities/models.py
# Also check for any get_image_url method in the same file
rg -A 5 "def get_image_url" src/website/apps/africancities/models.py
Length of output: 743
src/website/apps/event/migrations/0011_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py (1)
14-33:
Migration appears inconsistent with Cloudinary transition
This migration still uses Django's default ImageField and FileField with local upload paths, while the PR's objective and other changes indicate a transition to Cloudinary storage. This could lead to inconsistent behavior.
According to the AI summary, later migrations (0014-0018) switch these fields to CustomCloudinaryField. Consider either:
- Squashing these migrations before merging
- Updating this migration to use Cloudinary fields directly
src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0015_alter_cleanairresource_resource_file_and_more.py (1)
14-38: Migration looks good, but let's verify the field parameters.
The migration correctly transitions multiple fields to CloudinaryField with consistent parameters. However, let's verify that these parameters align with Cloudinary's recommended settings for different file types.
✅ Verification successful
CloudinaryField parameters are properly aligned with file types
The codebase analysis shows that CloudinaryField configurations are consistently implemented across models with appropriate parameters for different file types:
- Image fields (e.g.
partner_logo,picture,background_image) specifyresource_type="image"and appropriate image folders - File/document fields (e.g.
resource_file,file) specifyresource_type="raw"for non-image content - All fields consistently use
blank=True,null=True, andmax_length=255parameters - Proper folder organization under
website/uploads/with app-specific subfolders
The migration correctly standardizes these fields while maintaining the appropriate parameters for each field type.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any models specify different Cloudinary parameters
# that might be worth standardizing across these models
# Search for CloudinaryField configurations in models
rg -A 2 "CloudinaryField\(" --type py
Length of output: 71154
src/website/apps/externalteams/admin.py (1)
37-40: Verify URL sanitization and add size validation.
Ensure that get_picture_url() properly sanitizes the URL. Also, consider adding size validation for the detailed preview.
✅ Verification successful
URL sanitization is properly handled through Cloudinary integration
The implementation is secure because:
- The picture field uses CloudinaryField with proper configuration (folder, resource_type='image')
- Cloudinary automatically provides secure URLs through its service
- The get_picture_url() method simply returns the Cloudinary-managed URL which includes built-in security measures
The size constraints in the admin preview (max-width: 300px; max-height: 300px) are appropriate for a detailed view and don't require additional validation since they're purely presentational CSS properties.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check URL sanitization in get_picture_url method
# Search for get_picture_url implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_picture_url($$$)'
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the implementation
# First, let's find the relevant model file that might contain this method
rg -l "get_picture_url" --type py
# Then let's look for any URL-related code in the external teams app
rg "get_picture" --type py -A 5 src/website/apps/externalteams/
# Also search for the model class definition that might contain this method
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
get_picture$$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2370
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the picture field definition and any URL validation
rg "picture = " --type py -A 5 src/website/apps/externalteams/models.py
# Check if there's any URL validation or security middleware
rg "CloudinaryField|URLValidator|clean_picture|clean_" --type py src/website/apps/externalteams/models.py
# Look for any security-related imports
rg "^from|^import" --type py src/website/apps/externalteams/models.py
Length of output: 608
src/website/apps/press/models.py (1)
13-16: LGTM: CloudinaryField implementation looks good!
The transition to CloudinaryField with proper folder structure and configuration aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing upload issues.
src/website/apps/event/migrations/0014_alter_event_background_image_and_more.py (1)
17-17: Verify default image path existence
Ensure that 'website/uploads/default_image.webp' exists in your Cloudinary account to prevent potential issues with missing default images.
Also applies to: 27-27, 32-32, 37-37
src/website/apps/event/migrations/0015_alter_event_background_image_and_more.py (1)
18-19: Verify default image path exists in Cloudinary
Ensure that the default image path 'website/uploads/default_image.webp' exists in your Cloudinary account.
Also applies to: 28-29, 33-34, 38-39
src/website/requirements.txt (1)
14-14: Verify compatibility with Django 5.1.4 upgrade
The upgrade to Django 5.1.4 is a major version change that might introduce breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about Django-specific patterns to ensure a comprehensive verification.
Django 5.1.4 upgrade appears compatible with the codebase
The codebase shows modern Django patterns and no deprecated features:
- No deprecated URL patterns (
patterns()) - No legacy middleware implementations
- Modern settings configuration with proper templates setup
- No deprecated authentication backends
- No usage of removed text utilities (
force_text,smart_text)
The get_*_url() methods found are custom implementations and not related to Django's URL routing system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Django version specific code patterns
echo "Checking for potential incompatibilities..."
# Search for deprecated features
rg -l "force_text|force_unicode|smart_unicode|smart_text"
# Search for URL patterns using old style
rg "url\(.*\)" --type py
Length of output: 3408
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other Django version-specific patterns
echo "Checking for Django patterns..."
# Check for old-style middleware classes
rg "class.*\(.*Middleware\)" --type py -A 2
# Check for old database router syntax
rg "class.*\(.*Router\)" --type py -A 2
# Check for deprecated template settings
rg "TEMPLATE.*=.*" --type py
# Check for old-style URL patterns
rg "patterns\(.*\)" --type py
# Check for deprecated authentication backend patterns
rg "class.*\(.*Backend\)" --type py -A 2
# Check settings.py for potential incompatible configurations
fd "settings.py" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 9750
src/website/apps/partners/models.py (2)
37-38: Verify the impact of nullable fields on existing data
Making type and website_category nullable could affect existing records and frontend displays. While this provides flexibility, ensure that:
- Default values are properly handled in the frontend
- Existing records won't be affected
Let's check for existing records:
Also applies to: 49-50
18-23: Cloudinary integration looks good, but verify folder paths
The transition to CloudinaryField is a good solution for handling upload issues. The implementation includes proper resource type specification and null handling.
Let's verify the folder paths exist in Cloudinary:
Also applies to: 24-29
✅ Verification successful
CloudinaryField folder paths are consistent with the project's structure
The folder paths website/uploads/partners/images and website/uploads/partners/logos follow the established pattern across the codebase:
- All image assets use the
website/uploadsprefix - Each app has its dedicated subfolder (e.g., partners, team, press)
- Asset types are properly segregated (images, logos, files)
The implementation aligns with other models in the codebase that use CloudinaryField, such as:
- Team members:
website/uploads/team/members - Press:
website/uploads/press/logos - Highlights:
website/uploads/highlights/images
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these folders are accessible in other models
rg -g '*.py' "folder\s*=\s*['\"]website/uploads/partners" .
Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other Cloudinary folder paths in the codebase
# to ensure consistency in the folder structure
rg -g '*.py' "CloudinaryField.*folder\s*=\s*['\"]" .
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the model's history to see if this is a new pattern
# or follows existing conventions
git log -p -- src/website/apps/partners/models.py | grep -A 5 "CloudinaryField"
Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any configuration or settings related to Cloudinary
fd -e py -e yaml -e json -e ini | xargs rg "CLOUDINARY"
Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any existing Cloudinary field usage patterns
rg -g '*.py' "CloudinaryField\(" -A 5
Length of output: 74242
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other image upload related configurations
fd -e py | xargs rg "MEDIA_|STATIC_|upload"
Length of output: 56916
src/website/apps/event/migrations/0016_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more.py (1)
18-18: Verify default image path exists
The default image path 'website/uploads/default_image.webp' is used across all fields. Ensure this image exists in Cloudinary to prevent potential issues.
Let's check the default image usage:
Also applies to: 23-23, 28-28, 33-33
src/website/apps/africancities/models.py (4)
9-14: Well-structured CloudinaryField configuration for country_flag
The CloudinaryField configuration follows best practices with:
- Organized folder structure for flags
- Appropriate resource type specification
- Proper null/blank handling
85-90: Consistent CloudinaryField implementation for Image model
The Image model's CloudinaryField configuration and URL retrieval method follow the same pattern as AfricanCountry, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
Also applies to: 106-112
39-39: Consistent on_delete behavior across foreign keys
All foreign key relationships now consistently use models.SET_NULL, which is appropriate for maintaining data integrity when referenced objects are deleted.
Also applies to: 56-56, 74-74, 97-97
23-29: Simplified URL retrieval logic improves maintainability
The get_country_flag_url method has been appropriately simplified to leverage Cloudinary's built-in URL generation.
Let's verify the URL format:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to understand the Cloudinary integration and URL handling patterns in the codebase. This will help us verify if the simplified URL retrieval logic is consistent with the rest of the codebase's practices.
I'm searching for URL retrieval methods and Cloudinary URL handling patterns to verify the consistency of the URL retrieval logic across the codebase.
URL retrieval implementation is consistent across the codebase
The simplified URL retrieval logic in get_country_flag_url aligns perfectly with the established pattern across the codebase. All URL retrieval methods consistently leverage Cloudinary's built-in URL generation through the .url property, with similar null-checking patterns and identical comments about Cloudinary's secure URL handling. This approach is mirrored in multiple models including Team, Board, ExternalTeam, and other components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Cloudinary URL format in the codebase
rg -l 'cloudinary' | xargs rg 'get_.*_url.*cloudinary'
Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check for Cloudinary configuration and usage patterns
rg -i "cloudinary" -A 3 -B 3
# Also check for URL-related methods in the models
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_$_url'
Length of output: 84304
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for URL-related methods specifically in the models
rg "def get_.*_url" -A 3 -B 1
# Also check for any other Cloudinary URL handling patterns
rg "\.url.*cloudinary" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 8602
src/website/apps/cleanair/serializers.py (3)
14-20: Well-implemented resource file URL handling
The resource_file_url implementation follows best practices:
- Clear method name
- Proper null handling
- Direct use of Cloudinary URL
41-41: Consistent URL field naming convention
The transition to partner_logo_url improves clarity and follows a consistent naming pattern across the codebase.
Also applies to: 43-46
76-76: Simplified URL retrieval logic across multiple serializers
The URL retrieval methods for picture_url and file_url follow the same pattern, maintaining consistency and simplifying the codebase.
Let's verify the consistency of URL field naming:
Also applies to: 78-81, 92-94
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type wasn't recognized. Let's try a more general search without file type restriction to find URL-related serializer fields and their corresponding getter methods. This will help us verify the consistency of URL field naming and their implementation patterns across serializers.
URL field handling is consistently implemented across serializers
The codebase shows a clear and consistent pattern for URL field handling:
- All URL fields are defined using
SerializerMethodField() - Each URL field has a corresponding
get_*_urlmethod - The getter methods follow a consistent pattern of checking for the field's existence and returning its URL or None
- This pattern is consistently applied across multiple apps including cleanair, team, event, board, and others
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent URL field naming
rg "SerializerMethodField.*url" --type python
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SerializerMethodField with url pattern using ripgrep
rg "url.*=.*SerializerMethodField" -A 3
# Also search for get_<something>_url methods that might be related
rg "def get_\w+_url" -A 3
Length of output: 13057
src/website/apps/event/serializers.py (1)
15-15: Streamlined image URL handling across serializers
The URL retrieval methods have been consistently simplified across all serializers:
- Direct use of Cloudinary URLs
- Clear inline comments
- Consistent null handling
Also applies to: 28-28, 86-86, 127-127, 132-132
src/website/apps/cleanair/admin.py (3)
58-61: Well-structured nested inline configuration.
The ForumResourceInline setup with ResourceSessionInline follows good Django practices:
- Appropriate use of nested structure
- Setting extra=0 prevents empty forms
- Clear hierarchy of resources → sessions → files
113-119: Well-structured admin configuration for ForumResource.
The ForumResourceAdmin setup follows Django best practices with appropriate:
- List display fields
- Search functionality
- Filtering options
- Pagination
Line range hint 1-162: Verify upload functionality across models.
Let's verify that all models using image fields have proper error handling:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the image handling in the models and admin files.
Image handling implementation is properly secured and robust
The codebase demonstrates a well-implemented image handling system with proper error handling and security measures:
- CloudinaryField is used for all image fields with proper configuration (folder paths, resource types, and null/blank handling)
- Admin preview methods include comprehensive error handling:
- Primary try-catch blocks for image URL access
- Fallback empty states when images are not present
- Proper logging of errors with contextual information
- Safe HTML formatting using Django's format_html
- Image preview implementations enforce size constraints for security and performance
The changes align perfectly with the PR's objective of fixing internal server errors during content uploads while maintaining security and user experience.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for models with image fields and their error handling
# Find all model files
echo "Checking models with image fields..."
rg -l "CloudinaryField|ImageField" --type py
# Check for proper error handling in admin files
echo "\nChecking error handling in admin files..."
rg -A 5 "try:|except Exception" --type py | grep -v "test"
# Look for potential upload-related issues in logs
echo "\nChecking for upload-related errors in logging statements..."
rg "Error.*upload|upload.*failed|Error.*image" --type py
Length of output: 74081
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check models with image fields and their admin handling
echo "Checking image field definitions in models..."
rg "background_image|partner_logo|picture|image" src/website/apps/cleanair/models.py -A 2
echo "\nChecking admin image preview methods..."
rg "def.*preview" src/website/apps/cleanair/admin.py -A 10
Length of output: 2134
| logger.error(f"Invalid image file '{file.name}': {e}") | ||
| raise ValidationError(f"The file '{file.name}' is not a valid image.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use raise ... from e to preserve exception context
Including the original exception with raise ... from e helps maintain the traceback, which is valuable for debugging.
Apply this diff:
logger.error(f"Invalid image file '{file.name}': {e}")
- raise ValidationError(f"The file '{file.name}' is not a valid image.")
+ raise ValidationError(f"The file '{file.name}' is not a valid image.") from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logger.error(f"Invalid image file '{file.name}': {e}") | |
| raise ValidationError(f"The file '{file.name}' is not a valid image.") | |
| logger.error(f"Invalid image file '{file.name}': {e}") | |
| raise ValidationError(f"The file '{file.name}' is not a valid image.") from e |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
32-32: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
| # --------------------------------------------------------- | ||
| DATABASE_URL = os.getenv('DATABASE_URL') | ||
| if not DATABASE_URL: | ||
| raise ValueError( | ||
| "The DATABASE_URL environment variable is not set in production.") | ||
|
|
||
| DATABASES = { | ||
| 'default': dj_database_url.parse(DATABASE_URL, conn_max_age=600, ssl_require=True) | ||
| 'default': dj_database_url.parse( | ||
| DATABASE_URL, | ||
| conn_max_age=600, | ||
| ssl_require=True | ||
| ) if DATABASE_URL else { | ||
| 'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3', | ||
| 'NAME': BASE_DIR / 'db.sqlite3', | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| # Password validation | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure DATABASE_URL is required in production to prevent unintended use of SQLite
Currently, if the DATABASE_URL environment variable is not set, the application defaults to using SQLite. This could lead to unintentional use of SQLite in production, which may not be suitable for production workloads. Consider enforcing the presence of DATABASE_URL when DEBUG is False by utilizing the require_env_var function.
Apply the following changes to enforce DATABASE_URL in production environments:
DATABASE_URL = os.getenv('DATABASE_URL')
-if DEBUG:
- # Local file storage for development
+if DEBUG:
+ # Development settings
MEDIA_URL = '/media/'
DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE = 'django.core.files.storage.FileSystemStorage'
MEDIA_ROOT = BASE_DIR / 'assets'
- print("DEBUG=True: Using local file storage for media.")
+ DATABASES = {
+ 'default': {
+ 'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
+ 'NAME': BASE_DIR / 'db.sqlite3',
+ }
+ }
else:
- # Cloudinary setup for production
+ # Production settings
+ DATABASE_URL = require_env_var('DATABASE_URL')
+ DATABASES = {
+ 'default': dj_database_url.parse(
+ DATABASE_URL,
+ conn_max_age=600,
+ ssl_require=True
+ )
+ }
CLOUDINARY_STORAGE = {
'CLOUD_NAME': require_env_var('CLOUDINARY_CLOUD_NAME'),
'API_KEY': require_env_var('CLOUDINARY_API_KEY'),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -188,12 +214,14 @@ class Session(BaseModel): | |||
| start_time = models.TimeField(blank=True, null=True) | |||
| end_time = models.TimeField(blank=False, null=True) | |||
| session_title = models.CharField(max_length=150) | |||
| session_details = QuillField(blank=False, null=True) | |||
| session_details = models.TextField(default="No details available yet.") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure data migration is handled when changing session_details field type
Changing session_details from QuillField to TextField could lead to data loss or formatting issues if existing data is not properly migrated. Please ensure that a data migration is created to transfer and adapt existing content to the new field type.
| @@ -124,7 +140,7 @@ | |||
| class Engagement(BaseModel): | |||
| title = models.CharField(max_length=200) | |||
| forum_event = models.OneToOneField( | |||
| ForumEvent, null=True, blank=True, related_name="engagements", on_delete=models.SET_NULL, | |||
| ForumEvent, null=True, blank=True, related_name="engagement", on_delete=models.SET_NULL, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration Required: Related Name Change from 'engagements' to 'engagement'
The change in related_name from "engagements" to "engagement" requires attention as there is evidence of the old name in the initial migration (0001_initial.py). A new migration should be created to handle this change. The relationship is a OneToOneField, which makes this change particularly important to handle correctly.
- Found in migration:
src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/0001_initial.pyusingrelated_name='engagements' - Current model: Using
related_name="engagement"in the OneToOneField definition
🔗 Analysis chain
Review changes to related_name attributes to prevent breaking relationships
The related_name attributes in ForeignKey relationships have been modified (e.g., from "engagements" to "engagement"). This change can break existing queries and relationships that rely on the old related_name. Please verify that all references to these relationships are updated throughout the codebase.
To identify all usages of the old related_name values, you can run the following script:
Also applies to: 181-181, 200-200
Let me gather more information about the specific change in the related_name.
Let me analyze the specific model structure to understand the relationship better.
Let me do one final check to verify if there are any existing usages of the old related name in migrations or queries.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of old related_name values.
rg --no-heading --line-number "engagements"
rg --no-heading --line-number "partners"
rg --no-heading --line-number "programs"
Length of output: 7822
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the git history for the specific file to see the change
git log -p src/website/apps/cleanair/models.py | grep -A 5 -B 5 "related_name"
# Search for any Django query usage of these related names
rg -l "\.engagement\."
rg -l "\.engagements\."
# Look for any potential model references
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ (models.Model)'
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the model definition context
rg -A 10 -B 10 'related_name="engagement"' src/website/apps/cleanair/models.py
Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check migrations for any references to the old related_name
rg -A 5 -B 5 'related_name=.engagements.' src/website/apps/cleanair/migrations/
# Check for any potential QuerySet operations using the old name
rg -A 3 -B 3 'engagements\.' src/website/apps/cleanair/
Length of output: 897
| dependencies = [ | ||
| ('externalteams', '0006_alter_externalteammember_picture'), | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration sequence is valid, but field configuration has changed significantly
The migration sequence is properly ordered, but there's a notable evolution in the picture field configuration:
- Initial (0001): CustomCloudinaryField with default image and validators
- 0005: Changed to CustomImageField with upload_to parameter
- 0006: Reverted to CustomCloudinaryField with validators
- 0007: Simplified to basic CloudinaryField without defaults or validators
The current migration removes the default image and validators that were previously in place. If these are still required, they should be maintained in the field configuration.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify migration dependencies and field configuration
The migration looks well-structured, but let's ensure:
- The previous migration (
0006_alter_externalteammember_picture) has been properly applied in all environments - The field configuration aligns with the model's requirements
Also applies to: 14-18
This will help us verify the sequence of changes to the picture field and ensure there are no conflicting configurations across migrations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any conflicting migrations and verify the field configuration
fd --type f "000[0-9].*py" "src/website/apps/externalteams/migrations" --exec grep -l "picture" {} \; | sort
Length of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of these migration files to understand the field changes
for file in $(fd --type f "000[0-9].*py" "src/website/apps/externalteams/migrations" --exec grep -l "picture" {} \;); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "picture" "$file" -A 2 -B 2
done
Length of output: 3177
| psycopg2==2.9.10 | ||
| psycopg2-binary==2.9.10 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant PostgreSQL package
Both psycopg2 and psycopg2-binary are included, but you typically only need one of them.
Keep only psycopg2-binary as it's more commonly used and doesn't require system-level dependencies:
-psycopg2==2.9.10
psycopg2-binary==2.9.10📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| psycopg2==2.9.10 | |
| psycopg2-binary==2.9.10 | |
| psycopg2-binary==2.9.10 |
| field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format, django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format]), | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate validators in field definitions
The FileExtensionValidator and validate_image_format are duplicated in the field definitions. This redundancy might cause the validation to run twice unnecessarily.
Apply this fix to all affected fields:
-field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format, django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format])
+field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format])Also applies to: 23-24, 28-29
| # Generated by Django 5.1.4 on 2024-12-06 13:39 | ||
|
|
||
| import django.core.validators | ||
| import utils.fields | ||
| from django.db import migrations | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Migration(migrations.Migration): | ||
|
|
||
| dependencies = [ | ||
| ('event', '0016_alter_event_background_image_alter_event_event_image_and_more'), | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| operations = [ | ||
| migrations.AlterField( | ||
| model_name='event', | ||
| name='background_image', | ||
| field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format, django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format]), | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.AlterField( | ||
| model_name='event', | ||
| name='event_image', | ||
| field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format, django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format]), | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.AlterField( | ||
| model_name='partnerlogo', | ||
| name='partner_logo', | ||
| field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format, django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format]), | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.AlterField( | ||
| model_name='resource', | ||
| name='resource', | ||
| field=utils.fields.CustomCloudinaryField(blank=True, default='website/uploads/default_image.webp', max_length=255, null=True, validators=[django.core.validators.FileExtensionValidator(['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'webp', 'gif', 'bmp', 'tiff']), utils.fields.validate_image_format]), | ||
| ), | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate migration file
This migration file appears to be identical to 0016 and was generated just 9 minutes later. Having duplicate migrations can cause confusion and potential issues during deployment.
Recommendations:
- Remove this migration file
- If there are any pending changes, create a new migration with only those changes
- Update the migration dependencies accordingly
To prevent this in the future, consider squashing these migrations:
python manage.py squashmigrations event 0016| @@ -46,7 +37,7 @@ class Meta: | |||
| 'start_time', | |||
| 'end_time', | |||
| 'venue', | |||
| 'session_details', # Keep session_details as QuillField | |||
| 'session_details', # Now TextField | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Field type transition is not fully consistent
The migration from QuillField to TextField is still in progress. While the fields mentioned in the review comment have been changed to TextField in the event app:
program_details(models.TextField)session_details(models.TextField)event_detailsis still using QuillField
Additionally, there are numerous QuillField usages in the cleanair app that haven't been migrated yet.
🔗 Analysis chain
Field type standardization improves consistency
The transition from QuillField to TextField is applied consistently across:
- session_details
- program_details
- event_details
Let's verify the field type consistency:
Also applies to: 53-53, 117-117
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining QuillField usage
rg "QuillField" --type python
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for QuillField usage in all files
rg "QuillField"
# Search for field definitions in models and serializers
fd -e py | xargs rg "(TextField|QuillField|session_details|program_details|event_details)"
Length of output: 22315
| def background_image_preview(self, obj): | ||
| """Preview background image.""" | ||
| if obj.background_image and hasattr(obj.background_image, 'url'): | ||
| try: | ||
| return format_html( | ||
| '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>', | ||
| obj.background_image.url | ||
| ) | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| logger.error( | ||
| f"Error loading background_image for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}") | ||
| return "Error loading image." | ||
| elif isinstance(obj.background_image, str) and obj.background_image: | ||
| # Handle cases where background_image is a string path | ||
| try: | ||
| return format_html( | ||
| '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>', | ||
| obj.background_image | ||
| ) | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| logger.error( | ||
| f"Error loading background_image path for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}") | ||
| return "Error loading image." | ||
| return "No image uploaded." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security and reduce code duplication in image preview.
While the error handling is good, there are some security and maintainability improvements to consider:
def background_image_preview(self, obj):
"""Preview background image."""
+ def get_safe_image_html(url):
+ from django.utils.html import escape
+ safe_url = escape(url)
+ return format_html(
+ '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>',
+ safe_url
+ )
+
if obj.background_image:
try:
- return format_html(
- '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>',
- obj.background_image.url
- )
+ url = obj.background_image.url if hasattr(obj.background_image, 'url') else obj.background_image
+ return get_safe_image_html(url)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(
f"Error loading background_image for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}")
return "Error loading image."
- elif isinstance(obj.background_image, str) and obj.background_image:
- try:
- return format_html(
- '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>',
- obj.background_image
- )
- except Exception as e:
- logger.error(
- f"Error loading background_image path for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}")
- return "Error loading image."
return "No image uploaded."📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def background_image_preview(self, obj): | |
| """Preview background image.""" | |
| if obj.background_image and hasattr(obj.background_image, 'url'): | |
| try: | |
| return format_html( | |
| '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>', | |
| obj.background_image.url | |
| ) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error( | |
| f"Error loading background_image for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}") | |
| return "Error loading image." | |
| elif isinstance(obj.background_image, str) and obj.background_image: | |
| # Handle cases where background_image is a string path | |
| try: | |
| return format_html( | |
| '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>', | |
| obj.background_image | |
| ) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error( | |
| f"Error loading background_image path for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}") | |
| return "Error loading image." | |
| return "No image uploaded." | |
| def background_image_preview(self, obj): | |
| """Preview background image.""" | |
| def get_safe_image_html(url): | |
| from django.utils.html import escape | |
| safe_url = escape(url) | |
| return format_html( | |
| '<img src="{}" style="max-height: 150px; max-width: 300px;" alt="Background Image"/>', | |
| safe_url | |
| ) | |
| if obj.background_image: | |
| try: | |
| url = obj.background_image.url if hasattr(obj.background_image, 'url') else obj.background_image | |
| return get_safe_image_html(url) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error( | |
| f"Error loading background_image for ForumEvent '{obj.title}': {e}") | |
| return "Error loading image." | |
| return "No image uploaded." |
|
website changes in this PR available for preview here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/website/Dockerfile (2)
2-2: Consider adding version verification to entrypointSince this change is part of fixing upload issues, it would be beneficial to verify the Python version at runtime.
Add this to your entrypoint.sh:
+ # Verify Python version + python --version + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "Failed to verify Python version" + exit 1 + fi
Line range hint
1-24: Consider multi-stage build for smaller image sizeSince this Dockerfile is part of the website backend that handles uploads, optimizing the image size could improve deployment speed and resource usage.
Consider implementing a multi-stage build:
# Build stage + FROM python:3.11-slim as builder + ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE 1 + ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED 1 + WORKDIR /build + RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y gcc libpq-dev + COPY requirements.txt . + RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt # Final stage - FROM python:3.11-slim + FROM python:3.11-slim as final ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE 1 ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED 1 WORKDIR /app - RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y gcc libpq-dev && apt-get clean + RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y libpq-dev && apt-get clean - COPY requirements.txt ./ - RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt + COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ /usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ COPY . . EXPOSE 8000 RUN chmod +x /app/entrypoint.sh ENTRYPOINT ["/app/entrypoint.sh"]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/website/Dockerfile(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/website/Dockerfile (1)
2-2: Excellent choice upgrading to Python 3.11! Let's verify compatibility.
The upgrade to Python 3.11 is a positive change that can bring performance improvements and better error handling. However, we should ensure all dependencies are compatible with this version.
Let's verify the compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Python 3.11 upgrade is safe to proceed
After analyzing the requirements.txt, all major dependencies are using recent versions that are compatible with Python 3.11:
- Django 5.1.4 (fully supports Python 3.11)
- Cloudinary 1.41.0 (compatible with Python 3.11)
- Key packages like Pillow 11.0.0, NumPy 2.1.3, and Pandas 2.2.3 are all recent versions with Python 3.11 support
The upgrade should improve performance and provide better error messages, which aligns well with fixing the internal server errors during content upload.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check requirements.txt for potential compatibility issues with Python 3.11
# Check if requirements.txt exists and examine its contents
if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then
echo "Analyzing requirements.txt for potential compatibility issues..."
# Look for specific version pins that might indicate Python version constraints
rg -i "python_version|python_requires|;.*python" requirements.txt
# Check for known problematic packages with Python 3.11
rg -i "^(django|pillow|numpy|pandas|scipy|tensorflow|torch|cloudinary)" requirements.txt
else
echo "requirements.txt not found in the current directory"
fi
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for requirements files in the website directory since that's where the Dockerfile is
fd requirements.txt src/website/
# If found, let's examine its contents for version constraints and dependencies
fd requirements.txt src/website/ -x cat {}
# Let's also check for setup.py or pyproject.toml that might contain dependencies
fd "setup.py|pyproject.toml" src/website/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 1960
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/website/core/settings.py (3)
194-211: Consider additional security measures for file uploadsWhile the Cloudinary configuration is secure, consider adding:
- File type validation
- Scan uploads for malware
- Set appropriate CORS headers for media files
Add the following configuration:
CLOUDINARY_STORAGE.update({ 'ALLOWED_FORMATS': ['jpg', 'jpeg', 'png', 'gif', 'pdf'], 'INVALID_FILE_ERROR_MESSAGE': "Please upload valid image files only.", })
234-236: Consider making upload size configurableWhile 10MB is a reasonable default, consider making it configurable via environment variables to allow for different limits in different environments.
-MAX_UPLOAD_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024 # 10MB +MAX_UPLOAD_SIZE = int(os.getenv('MAX_UPLOAD_SIZE', 10 * 1024 * 1024)) # Default: 10MB
122-123: Consider independent security controlsWhile tying cookie security to DEBUG is common, consider making these independently configurable for more flexibility in staging environments.
-CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE = not DEBUG -SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = not DEBUG +CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE = get_env_bool('CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE', not DEBUG) +SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = get_env_bool('SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE', not DEBUG)src/website/apps/event/models.py (3)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured imports and logging setup.The addition of Cloudinary-related imports and logging configuration is well-organized. The logging setup will help with debugging upload issues.
Consider adding a log format that includes the request ID to help correlate logs across different operations:
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
68-83: CloudinaryField implementation follows best practices.The migration to CloudinaryField is well-structured with:
- Organized folder hierarchy
- Correct resource type specifications
- Proper null/blank handling
Consider implementing:
- Environment-specific folder prefixes to separate dev/staging/prod uploads
- A CDN caching strategy for better performance
- Image transformation presets for consistent sizing and optimization
Also applies to: 180-186, 219-225
97-114: Robust Cloudinary resource cleanup implementation.The delete methods properly handle Cloudinary resource cleanup with comprehensive error handling and logging.
Consider extracting the Cloudinary cleanup logic into a mixin to reduce code duplication:
class CloudinaryResourceMixin: def cleanup_cloudinary_resource(self, field_name): field = getattr(self, field_name, None) if field: try: destroy(field.public_id) logger.info(f"Deleted {field_name} from Cloudinary: {field.public_id}") except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Error deleting {field_name} from Cloudinary: {e}")Also applies to: 205-212, 243-250
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/website/apps/event/models.py(8 hunks)src/website/core/settings.py(7 hunks)src/website/static/admin/css/custom_quill.css(1 hunks)src/website/templates/admin/base_site.html(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/website/templates/admin/base_site.html
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/website/core/settings.py (3)
25-49: Well-structured environment variable handling!
The helper functions are well-implemented with proper type hints, documentation, and error handling. This is a good example of defensive programming.
51-56: Excellent security-first approach!
The use of require_env_var for SECRET_KEY and defaulting DEBUG to False follows security best practices. This prevents accidental exposure of debug information in production.
152-164: Consider enforcing DATABASE_URL in production
The current implementation allows fallback to SQLite when DATABASE_URL is not set, which could be risky in production environments.
src/website/static/admin/css/custom_quill.css (2)
1-3: Well-structured addition of the quill container!
The new .quill-container class with min-height is a good practice as it allows for dynamic content growth while maintaining a consistent minimum height.
6-6: Verify the impact of reduced editor height
The height reduction from 300px to 200px might affect the user experience when working with larger content in the admin panel. Please ensure this change doesn't negatively impact content visibility and editing workflow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the Quill editor's usage and configuration.
Let me try one more search to find any Quill editor initialization and usage patterns.
Height adjustment appears to be an isolated style change
The reduced height from 300px to 200px is a minor adjustment to the Quill editor's minimum height in the admin panel. From our analysis:
- The style is defined in a custom CSS file specifically for the admin panel
- No other height configurations were found that might conflict with this change
- The editor still maintains a minimum height, ensuring content remains visible
- Being a minimum height, the editor can still expand as needed for larger content
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for any related height configurations or overrides in other CSS/template files
# Search for related Quill editor height configurations
echo "Searching for related Quill editor height configurations..."
rg -g '*.{css,html,django-html}' -i '(height|min-height).*?(quill|ql-)'
# Search for any template files using the Quill editor
echo "Searching for template files using Quill editor..."
rg -g '*.{html,django-html}' -i 'quill'
Length of output: 684
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JavaScript configurations of Quill editor
echo "Searching for Quill editor JavaScript configurations..."
rg -g '*.{js,html,django-html}' -B 3 -A 3 'new Quill'
# Search for any custom CSS classes that might be applied to Quill editor
echo "Searching for custom CSS classes related to Quill..."
rg -g '*.{css,html,django-html}' 'ql-editor'
# Look for any admin form templates that might use the editor
echo "Searching for admin form templates..."
fd -g '*form*.html' -g '*admin*.html' --exec grep -l 'quill' {} \;
Length of output: 743
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Quill editor initialization in admin templates with proper context
echo "Searching for Quill editor initialization..."
rg -g '*.{html,django-html}' -B 5 -A 5 'Quill\(' src/website/templates/admin/
# Check for any textareas or form fields that might use Quill
echo "Searching for textareas in admin templates..."
rg -g '*.{html,django-html}' -B 2 -A 2 'textarea' src/website/templates/admin/
Length of output: 358
src/website/apps/event/models.py (2)
26-63: Choice field updates look good, verify existing data compatibility.
The choice fields are well-structured with clear, meaningful options. The naming convention is consistent.
Let's verify that existing records are compatible with the updated choices:
✅ Verification successful
The previous pattern didn't match, so I'm trying a broader search to:
- Find the Event model definition
- Look for any migrations that might indicate existing data
- Search for any usage of these fields that might show historical values
This will help us verify the compatibility of the choice field updates with existing data.
Choice field updates are safe to proceed
Based on the migration files and codebase analysis:
- The initial migration (0001_initial.py) shows that the original choices match the updated ones
- All fields have
null=True, blank=True, providing safety for any edge cases - Default values are consistent with the existing choices
- The changes maintain backward compatibility with existing data
The evidence shows that:
- The
website_categorychoices (AIRQO, CLEANAIR) remain unchanged - The
event_tagchoices (NONE, FEATURED) are preserved - The
event_categorymaintains all its original values - The migration history doesn't show any breaking changes to these fields
These updates are well-structured and maintain compatibility with existing records.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing records that might have incompatible choice values
ast-grep --pattern 'class Event(BaseModel):
$$$
website_category = $value
$$$
'
ast-grep --pattern 'class Event(BaseModel):
$$$
event_tag = $value
$$$
'
ast-grep --pattern 'class Event(BaseModel):
$$$
event_category = $value
$$$
'
Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the Event model and its field definitions
rg -A 5 "class Event\("
# Also search for any migrations that might show historical field values
fd "\.py$" -e py --exec rg -l "migrations" {} \;
# Check for any database operations in migrations related to these fields
rg -A 3 "website_category|event_tag|event_category" --type py
Length of output: 17615
140-140: Verify frontend compatibility with TextField migration.
The change from QuillField to TextField might affect rich text rendering in the frontend.
Let's check for any frontend components that might be expecting QuillField data:
Also applies to: 162-162
✅ Verification successful
Migration from QuillField to TextField is properly handled
The change from QuillField to TextField has been implemented with proper data migration:
- Migration
0012changes the field types to TextField - Migration
0013includes a comprehensive data transformation that:- Properly converts existing Quill JSON/HTML content to plain text
- Handles both Delta format and HTML content
- Preserves line breaks and paragraph structure
- Frontend rendering is handled through Django REST Framework serializers without any Quill-specific processing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for frontend components that might be affected
rg -l "program_details|session_details" --type=javascript --type=typescript
# Check for any QuillField-specific handling
rg "Quill" --type=javascript --type=typescript
Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for frontend files with potential Quill or rich text handling
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -l "program_details|session_details"
# Search for Quill-related imports or components
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -l "Quill|ReactQuill"
# Look for any HTML rendering of program_details
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "program_details.*html|dangerouslySetInnerHTML.*program_details"
# Check Django templates that might render program_details
fd -e html | xargs rg "program_details"
Length of output: 289
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for static/src directories that might contain frontend code
fd -t d "static|src|frontend|assets"
# Check for template files with different extensions
fd -e html -e djhtml -e django-html | xargs rg "program_details"
# Look for any webpack or build configuration files that might indicate frontend structure
fd -g "webpack*" -g "package.json"
# Check for any Django view files that might render these fields
rg -t python "program_details.*render|render.*program_details"
Length of output: 449
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check frontend files in the discovered static and src directories
find src/view/src/ src/website/static/ src/website/assets/ -type f -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | xargs cat
# Look for templates in the website directory
find src/website -type f -name "*.html" -o -name "*.djhtml" -o -name "*.django-html" | xargs cat
# Check Django views for program_details usage
find src/website -type f -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l "program_details"
Length of output: 10277
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of relevant files to understand the implementation
cat src/website/apps/event/admin.py
cat src/website/apps/event/serializers.py
# Check the migration files to understand the field changes
cat src/website/apps/event/migrations/0012_alter_program_program_details_and_more.py
cat src/website/apps/event/migrations/0013_auto_20241206_1317.py
# Look for any templates specifically in the event app
find src/website/apps/event/templates -type f -name "*.html" | xargs cat
Length of output: 14167
| # Mode-Specific Logging | ||
| # --------------------------------------------------------- | ||
| if DEBUG: | ||
| print(f"Debug mode is: {DEBUG}") | ||
| print(f"Media files are stored in: {MEDIA_ROOT}") | ||
| print(f"Media files are stored in: {BASE_DIR / 'assets'}") | ||
| else: | ||
| print("Production mode is ON") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance logging configuration for production
The current logging setup is basic. Consider implementing a more comprehensive logging configuration for production environments.
Add structured logging configuration:
LOGGING = {
'version': 1,
'disable_existing_loggers': False,
'formatters': {
'verbose': {
'format': '{levelname} {asctime} {module} {process:d} {thread:d} {message}',
'style': '{',
},
},
'handlers': {
'console': {
'class': 'logging.StreamHandler',
'formatter': 'verbose',
},
},
'root': {
'handlers': ['console'],
'level': 'INFO',
},
}
|
website changes in this PR available for preview here |
Description
Related Issues
Changes Made
Testing
[Add any additional notes or comments here]
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
CloudinaryField, streamlining image management.Chores
requirements.txt, transitioning to newer packages and versions.