using the default tenant for the events insertion endpoint #3748
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #3748 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 11.84% 11.84%
========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 14939 14938 -1
Branches 274 274
========================================
Hits 1770 1770
+ Misses 13169 13168 -1
|
|
Device registry changes in this PR available for preview here |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/device-registry/controllers/create-event.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/device-registry/controllers/create-event.js
[warning] 504-504: src/device-registry/controllers/create-event.js#L504
Added line #L504 was not covered by tests
| let result = await createEventUtil.insert( | ||
| defaultTenant, | ||
| measurements, | ||
| next | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage needed for tenant functionality
The test suite for the addValues method lacks specific test cases for the tenant handling functionality. While the basic test structure exists, it needs to be enhanced to cover:
- Default tenant behavior when no tenant is provided
- Custom tenant usage when explicitly provided
- Proper tenant propagation to createEventUtil.insert
- Add test case:
should use default tenant when no tenant is provided - Add test case:
should use provided tenant when available - Add test case:
should properly pass tenant to createEventUtil.insert
🔗 Analysis chain
Implementation looks good, but needs test coverage.
The changes correctly implement the default tenant functionality by using the defaultTenant variable in the createEventUtil.insert call. However, this critical change lacks test coverage.
Let's verify the test coverage:
Would you like me to help create test cases to cover:
- Default tenant being used when no tenant is provided
- Custom tenant being used when provided
- Error handling scenarios
Let me gather more context about the test coverage and implementation details.
This will help us understand:
- The exact signature of the insert function
- How defaultTenant is initialized
- Current test coverage for tenant-related scenarios
Let me gather more specific information about the test coverage for the tenant-related functionality.
This will help us understand:
- If there are specific test cases for tenant handling
- How the createEventUtil.insert mock is set up
- The test environment setup for addValues tests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files related to create-event controller
fd -e test.js -e spec.js create-event
# Search for existing test cases covering the addValues method
rg -A 5 "describe.*addValues|test.*addValues|it.*addValues"
Length of output: 3322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of createEventUtil.insert to understand its parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'insert = async function($$$) {'
# Look for the defaultTenant initialization
rg -B 2 -A 2 'defaultTenant.*=.*constants\.DEFAULT_TENANT'
# Check test setup for tenant-related configurations
rg -B 5 'tenant.*=.*' src/device-registry/controllers/test/ut_create-event.js
Length of output: 200469
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test cases specifically related to tenant handling in create-event tests
rg -B 2 -A 2 "tenant.*=.*|defaultTenant" src/device-registry/controllers/test/ut_create-event.js
# Check the test setup for createEventUtil.insert mocks
rg -B 2 -A 2 "createEventUtil.insert.*=.*|insert.*=.*mock" src/device-registry/controllers/test/ut_create-event.js
# Look for beforeEach setup in the addValues test suite
rg -B 5 -A 10 "describe.*addValues" src/device-registry/controllers/test/ut_create-event.js
Length of output: 661
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 504-504: src/device-registry/controllers/create-event.js#L504
Added line #L504 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Create a Github issue for this suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Baalmart, I've created a GitHub issue to track this suggestion: Issue #3749.
🔗 Analysis chain
@Baalmart, I've opened a GitHub issue to track this suggestion for adding test coverage to the addValues method.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a GitHub issue for the test coverage suggestion
gh issue create \
--title "Add test coverage for tenant functionality in addValues method" \
--body "The test suite for the \`addValues\` method lacks specific test cases for tenant handling functionality.
See PR #3748 and the discussion [here](https://github.com/airqo-platform/AirQo-api/pull/3748#discussion_r1813683540).
Requested by @Baalmart." \
--assignee Baalmart
Length of output: 422
Description
using the default tenant for the events insertion endpoint
Changes Made
Testing
Affected Services
Endpoints Ready for Testing
API Documentation Updated?
Additional Notes
using the default tenant for the events insertion endpoint
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes