Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

just reducing the payload for devices summary endpoint #3679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Oct 17, 2024

Description

just reducing the payload for devices summary endpoint

Changes Made

  • just reducing the payload for devices summary endpoint

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Device Registry

Endpoints Ready for Testing

  • New endpoints ready for testing:
    • get sites summary: {{baseUrl}}/api/v2/devices/sites/summary

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Additional Notes

just reducing the payload for devices summary endpoint

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced exclusion projections for devices and grids, improving data specificity in summary views.
    • Added new fields to the exclusion lists for sites, devices, and grids based on context.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the dbProjections object within the src/device-registry/config/global/db-projections.js file. New fields have been added to the exclusion projections for devices and grids, specifically in the SITES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION, DEVICES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION, and GRIDS_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION functions. These modifications enhance the specificity of the projections by explicitly excluding additional fields based on the provided path parameter.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/device-registry/config/global/db-projections.js Updated SITES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION, DEVICES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION, and GRIDS_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION functions to include new fields in the exclusion lists for the "summary" path.

Possibly related PRs

🎉 In the realm of code where changes flow,
New fields emerge, like seeds we sow.
Exclusions refined, projections anew,
Enhancing our data, a clearer view!
With each little tweak, our systems align,
In the dance of development, all will be fine! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 27.04%. Comparing base (04e29eb) to head (9eedb85).
Report is 2 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #3679   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    27.04%   27.04%           
========================================
  Files          146      146           
  Lines        21340    21340           
  Branches       274      274           
========================================
  Hits          5772     5772           
  Misses       15568    15568           

Copy link
Contributor

Device registry changes in this PR available for preview here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/device-registry/config/global/db-projections.js (1)

300-302: Good additions to further reduce payload size

The new fields (admin_level, visibility, and name) added to the exclusion list for the "summary" path in the GRIDS_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function contribute to the PR's goal of reducing the payload size. This change is consistent with the modifications made to the SITES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function.

For improved consistency and maintainability, consider using an array to store these field names:

if (path === "summary") {
  projection = Object.assign(initialProjection, {
    shape: 0,
    grid_tags: 0,
    grid_codes: 0,
    centers: 0,
    "sites.latitude": 0,
    "sites.longitude": 0,
    "sites.generated_name": 0,
    "sites.bearing_in_radians": 0,
    "sites.approximate_distance_in_km": 0,
+   ...["admin_level", "visibility", "name"].reduce((acc, field) => ({ ...acc, [field]: 0 }), {})
  });
}

This approach would make it easier to add or remove fields in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04e29eb and 9eedb85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/device-registry/config/global/db-projections.js (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/device-registry/config/global/db-projections.js (2)

260-264: Excellent addition to reduce payload size!

The new fields added to the exclusion list for the "summary" path in the SITES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function align perfectly with the PR's objective of reducing the payload for the devices summary endpoint. By excluding device-related fields like grids, cohorts, host_id, lastActive, and isOnline, you're effectively minimizing the data transferred, which should improve API performance.


Line range hint 1-1000: Summary: Effective changes to reduce payload size

The modifications made to the SITES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION and GRIDS_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION functions effectively contribute to reducing the payload size for the devices summary endpoint. These changes align well with the PR's objective and should improve API performance.

However, there's a discrepancy between the AI-generated summary and the actual code changes regarding the DEVICES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function. It's important to verify if any intended changes for this function were omitted.

Overall, the changes are positive and achieve the goal of minimizing the payload. The suggested refactoring for the GRIDS_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function could further improve code maintainability.

To ensure completeness, please:

  1. Verify the status of changes to the DEVICES_EXCLUSION_PROJECTION function.
  2. Consider implementing the suggested refactoring for improved consistency.
  3. Update the API documentation to reflect these changes in the response structure for summary requests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant