refactor: Add hits range property to ParticleSelector
#4057
Conversation
WalkthroughHmm, a configuration enhancement for the ParticleSelector algorithm, this is! In the realm of Python bindings for Acts Examples, a new range property for Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Poem
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Python
participant ParticleSelector
Python->>ParticleSelector: Configure hits range
ParticleSelector-->>Python: Confirm configuration
Hmm, yes. Configuration enhanced, the code has become! 🌈 ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Python/src/TruthTracking.cpp (1)
110-110: Approve this change, I do! Yet documentation, we should add.Correctly implemented, the hits range property is. Following the ways of other range properties, it does. Hmmmm.
A comment describing the purpose of hits range, add we should. Like this, it could be:
ACTS_PYTHON_MEMBER(ptMax); + // Minimum and maximum number of hits for particle selection ACTS_PYTHON_MEMBER(hitsMin); ACTS_PYTHON_MEMBER(hitsMax);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Examples/Python/src/TruthTracking.cpp(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: merge-sentinel
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Examples/Python/src/TruthTracking.cpp (1)
110-110: Clarity between hits and measurements, we seek.Confused, a young padawan might be. Two similar properties we have - 'hits' and 'measurements'. Their distinct purposes, unclear they are.
Clarify these questions, you must:
- What differs between hits and measurements?
- When to use hits vs measurements, guide us you should
- If both properties needed are, explain why
Run this command to search for insights, we shall:
✅ Verification successful
Clear now, the difference between hits and measurements is.
Hmm, yes. Two different concepts they are:
- Hits: Raw simulation truth they represent. When particles through detector pass, their true interactions recorded are.
- Measurements: Digitized signals they are. From hits they come, but detector effects and electronics response included they have.
Natural flow this is:
- Particle through detector travels -> Hits generated are
- Hits through digitization process go -> Measurements created are
- Measurements for track reconstruction used are
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage and documentation of hits vs measurements rg -A 3 -B 3 "hits|measurements" --type cpp --type hppLength of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search in C++ files with correct extensions echo "=== Searching in C++ source files ===" rg -A 3 -B 3 "hits|measurements" --type cpp echo -e "\n=== Searching in header files ===" rg -A 3 -B 3 "hits|measurements" -g "*.h" echo -e "\n=== Searching for Config class usage ===" ast-grep --pattern 'class Config { $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Searching documentation ===" rg -A 3 -B 3 "hits|measurements" -g "*.md" -g "*.txt"Length of output: 66217
|
--- END COMMIT MESSAGE ---
Any further description goes here, @-mentions are ok here!
feat,fix,refactor,docs,choreandbuildtypes.Summary by CodeRabbit
ParticleSelectoralgorithm configuration withhitsrange property