-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Allow multiple aliases for one whiteboard entry in Examples #4035
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughIn the framework of ACTS Examples, a transformation has occurred in the WhiteBoard and Sequencer components. The primary change involves shifting from a standard unordered map to a multimap for object aliases, enabling multiple aliases to be associated with a single object name. This modification enhances the flexibility of object name management across the system, allowing more nuanced alias handling. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Sequencer
participant WhiteBoard
Sequencer->>WhiteBoard: addWhiteboardAlias
WhiteBoard-->>Sequencer: Check existing aliases
WhiteBoard->>WhiteBoard: Insert new alias if unique
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Can we schedule this behind #4018? That also touches the aliasing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (1)
119-122
: Approve the implementation of multiple aliases, I do. Hmmmm.Correct and elegant, this implementation is. Multiple aliases for one whiteboard entry, it now supports. Through the Force, I sense good practices:
- Proper use of
equal_range
for multimap iteration- Consistent logging for each alias addition
- Safe access to store with operator[]
Yet a small suggestion, I have. Performance improve, we could:
- auto range = m_objectAliases.equal_range(name); + const auto range = m_objectAliases.equal_range(name);Save unnecessary copies, this will. Small but meaningful, the optimization is.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/WhiteBoard.hpp
(3 hunks)Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/WhiteBoard.hpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
- GitHub Check: merge-sentinel
- GitHub Check: unused_files
- GitHub Check: missing_includes
- GitHub Check: CI Bridge / build_exatrkx
- GitHub Check: CI Bridge / build_exatrkx_cpu
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204_clang, 20)
- GitHub Check: CI Bridge / clang_tidy
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204, 20)
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu
- GitHub Check: build_debug
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (1)
119-122
: Verify the interaction with PR #4018, we must.Sense a disturbance in the Force, I do. Another PR (#4018) also deals with aliasing, mentioned in the comments it was. Verify the compatibility between these changes, we should.
✅ Verification successful
Hmmmm... Safe these changes are, young Padawan.
Clear it is that PR #4018 and these changes, in harmony they exist. Different aspects of the WhiteBoard they touch - move semantics and buffering in one, aliasing operations in the other. Conflict between them, I sense not.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for aliasing-related changes in PR #4018 gh pr view 4018 --json files -q '.files[].path' | grep -i 'whiteboard\|sequencer' # Check for potential conflicts gh pr checks 4035Length of output: 3757
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get PR #4018 description and changes gh pr view 4018 --json title,body,files # Look for aliasing-related changes in both PRs rg -n "alias" Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp rg -n "m_objectAliases" Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cppLength of output: 2339
This allows us having multiple aliases pointing to the same object in the whiteboard which was not possible before because of the usage of
std::unordered_map
which is now replaced withstd::unordered_multimap
Pulled out of #3969
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Bug Fixes