Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Allow multiple aliases for one whiteboard entry in Examples #4035

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andiwand
Copy link
Contributor

@andiwand andiwand commented Jan 16, 2025

This allows us having multiple aliases pointing to the same object in the whiteboard which was not possible before because of the usage of std::unordered_map which is now replaced with std::unordered_multimap

Pulled out of #3969

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced object aliasing capabilities in the framework.
    • Added support for multiple aliases per object name.
  • Refactor

    • Updated data structures to support more flexible alias management.
    • Modified alias handling logic in WhiteBoard and Sequencer components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error checking and logging for object aliases.

@andiwand andiwand added this to the next milestone Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

In the framework of ACTS Examples, a transformation has occurred in the WhiteBoard and Sequencer components. The primary change involves shifting from a standard unordered map to a multimap for object aliases, enabling multiple aliases to be associated with a single object name. This modification enhances the flexibility of object name management across the system, allowing more nuanced alias handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/Sequencer.hpp Changed m_whiteboardObjectAliases from std::unordered_map to std::unordered_multimap
Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/WhiteBoard.hpp Updated constructor and m_objectAliases to use std::unordered_multimap
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/Sequencer.cpp Modified addWhiteboardAlias method to work with multimap, adjusted alias insertion logic
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp Updated addHolder method to process multiple aliases using equal_range

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Sequencer
    participant WhiteBoard
    Sequencer->>WhiteBoard: addWhiteboardAlias
    WhiteBoard-->>Sequencer: Check existing aliases
    WhiteBoard->>WhiteBoard: Insert new alias if unique
Loading

Poem

Aliases dance, multiple and free
🗺️ Maps transform with gentle glee
One name, now many paths to see
Flexibility blooms like a coding tree
Multimap magic, oh what could be! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad51cf and e394502.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: merge-sentinel
  • GitHub Check: unused_files
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204_clang, 20)
  • GitHub Check: missing_includes
  • GitHub Check: macos
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204, 20)
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu
  • GitHub Check: docs
  • GitHub Check: build_debug

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Component - Examples Affects the Examples module label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2025

📊: Physics performance monitoring for 0ad51cf

Full contents

physmon summary

@paulgessinger
Copy link
Member

Can we schedule this behind #4018? That also touches the aliasing.

benjaminhuth
benjaminhuth previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@benjaminhuth benjaminhuth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (1)

119-122: Approve the implementation of multiple aliases, I do. Hmmmm.

Correct and elegant, this implementation is. Multiple aliases for one whiteboard entry, it now supports. Through the Force, I sense good practices:

  • Proper use of equal_range for multimap iteration
  • Consistent logging for each alias addition
  • Safe access to store with operator[]

Yet a small suggestion, I have. Performance improve, we could:

-    auto range = m_objectAliases.equal_range(name);
+    const auto range = m_objectAliases.equal_range(name);

Save unnecessary copies, this will. Small but meaningful, the optimization is.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c87a2d9 and 0ad51cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/WhiteBoard.hpp (3 hunks)
  • Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Examples/Framework/include/ActsExamples/Framework/WhiteBoard.hpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
  • GitHub Check: merge-sentinel
  • GitHub Check: unused_files
  • GitHub Check: missing_includes
  • GitHub Check: CI Bridge / build_exatrkx
  • GitHub Check: CI Bridge / build_exatrkx_cpu
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204_clang, 20)
  • GitHub Check: CI Bridge / clang_tidy
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204, 20)
  • GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu
  • GitHub Check: build_debug
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp (1)

119-122: Verify the interaction with PR #4018, we must.

Sense a disturbance in the Force, I do. Another PR (#4018) also deals with aliasing, mentioned in the comments it was. Verify the compatibility between these changes, we should.

✅ Verification successful

Hmmmm... Safe these changes are, young Padawan.

Clear it is that PR #4018 and these changes, in harmony they exist. Different aspects of the WhiteBoard they touch - move semantics and buffering in one, aliasing operations in the other. Conflict between them, I sense not.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for aliasing-related changes in PR #4018
gh pr view 4018 --json files -q '.files[].path' | grep -i 'whiteboard\|sequencer'

# Check for potential conflicts
gh pr checks 4035

Length of output: 3757


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get PR #4018 description and changes
gh pr view 4018 --json title,body,files

# Look for aliasing-related changes in both PRs
rg -n "alias" Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp
rg -n "m_objectAliases" Examples/Framework/src/Framework/WhiteBoard.cpp

Length of output: 2339

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component - Examples Affects the Examples module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants