Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add changes to support 32 bit addend address in ELF patching #8649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

rbramand-xilinx
Copy link
Collaborator

@rbramand-xilinx rbramand-xilinx commented Dec 10, 2024

Problem solved by the commit

Earlier rela dynamic sections addend fields higher 28 bits were used for holding base buffers addend address but 28 bits are not sufficient in all cases.
This change adds support for 32 bit addend.
AIEBU generates new ELF with ABI version 2 which uses rela section entries r_addend for 32 bit addend address and type is used for patching schema. Made changes according to new spec.

Bug / issue (if any) fixed, which PR introduced the bug, how it was discovered

Added support for 32 bit addend

How problem was solved, alternative solutions (if any) and why they were rejected

Ideally moving to 64 bit ELF should solve the problem but it requires lot of changes from both aiebu and XRT side so this is planned for upcoming releases. Also other solutions which breaks existing ELFs are rejected.
This change doesn't cause any issue as there are version checks

Risks (if any) associated the changes in the commit

Low

What has been tested and how, request additional testing if necessary

Tested failing psq2 application and test passes with this fix

Documentation impact (if any)

NA

Copy link
Collaborator

@stsoe stsoe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is getting out of hand, shifting, bit specific, long long functions that appear to be generic and not specific to a particular bit pattern.

Copy link
Collaborator

@larry9523 larry9523 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the impact to the exsiting elf? I think type filed is 'a' though I don't why. Does that mean new XRT with exsiting elf will be broken?

Copy link
Collaborator

@larry9523 larry9523 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's go with OSABI Version change and use the whole 32 bits addend as argplus.

@chvamshi-xilinx
Copy link
Collaborator

This is getting out of hand, shifting, bit specific, long long functions that appear to be generic and not specific to a particular bit pattern.

Yeah Soren. Discussed with Sonal aswell. He suggested to move all of this code to aiebu and XRT uses functions from it. It is going to take some time :-)

@rbramand-xilinx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Let's go with OSABI Version change and use the whole 32 bits addend as argplus.

Hi @larry9523 made changes as discussed, please review

@stsoe stsoe merged commit ae8996c into Xilinx:master Dec 11, 2024
20 checks passed
chvamshi-xilinx pushed a commit to chvamshi-xilinx/XRT-1 that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
chvamshi-xilinx added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
…8676)

Signed-off-by: ch vamshi krishna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ch vamshi krishna <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants