Fix Linting Issues #209
Fix Linting Issues #209
Conversation
WayneLambert
added
the
refactor candidate
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey WayneLambert - Here's my review!
General suggestions:
- Consider the implications of directly referencing the
Usermodel on future flexibility and extensibility of the user model. - Review all related unit tests to ensure they are updated to reflect the changes in model relationships and method signatures.
- Ensure that the direct use of
Userdoes not introduce any regressions or limitations, especially in custom user model scenarios. - Verify the broader impact of these changes on the application, particularly in areas related to user authentication and profile management.
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| @@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ class UserRegisterView(CreateView): | |||
|
|
|||
| def user_exists(self, form) -> bool: | |||
| username = form.data["username"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (llm): Directly referencing the User model instead of using get_user_model() reduces the flexibility of the user model. If the project ever needs to customize the user model, this change will necessitate refactoring all direct references to User.
| @@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| def user_exists(self, form) -> bool: | |||
| username = form.data["username"] | |||
| user = get_user_model().objects.filter(username=username) | |||
| user = User.objects.filter(username=username) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): I noticed the change from get_user_model() to User directly. While this change might not directly impact functionality, it's crucial to ensure that all related unit tests are updated to reflect this change. Specifically, any mock objects or fixtures that rely on the user model should be reviewed to ensure consistency.
| @@ -110,7 +109,7 @@ | |||
| }, | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| def email_two_factor_token(self, user: get_user_model(), token): | |||
| def email_two_factor_token(self, user: User, token): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): Given the changes in method signatures to use User directly, it's important to verify if the tests covering email_two_factor_token and related methods are still valid. Ensure that the tests accurately mock the User model and any of its interactions within these methods.
| @@ -29,7 +28,7 @@ class AuthorView(models.IntegerChoices): | |||
|
|
|||
| # Relationship Fields | |||
| user = models.OneToOneField( | |||
| get_user_model(), primary_key=True, related_name="profile", on_delete=models.CASCADE | |||
| User, primary_key=True, related_name="profile", on_delete=models.CASCADE | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The change in the ForeignKey relationship to use User directly should prompt a review of the model tests, especially those involving the profile related name. Ensure that the tests reflect this change and that any mock or factory objects used in the tests are updated accordingly.
| @@ -49,7 +48,7 @@ class Post(models.Model): | |||
| help_text="For bests results, use an image that is 1,200px wide x 600px high", | |||
| ) | |||
| status = models.IntegerField(db_index=True, choices=STATUS, default=0) | |||
| author = models.ForeignKey(get_user_model(), related_name="author", on_delete=models.CASCADE) | |||
| author = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name="author", on_delete=models.CASCADE) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): This change impacts the Post model's relationship with the User model. It's essential to ensure that all tests related to the Post model, especially those that involve the author relationship, are updated to reflect this change. This includes updating any fixtures or mock objects used in these tests.
| @@ -1,24 +1,17 @@ | |||
| import datetime | |||
|
|
|||
| from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The removal of get_user_model import in this test file suggests that there were changes in how the user model is referenced in the tests. Please ensure that all instances where get_user_model() was used are updated to use the User model directly, and that these changes do not affect the integrity of the tests.
| user_passes_auth = self.authenticate_user(user=user) | ||
| if user_passes_auth: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (rule): Sourcery has identified the following issue:
- Use named expression to simplify assignment and conditional (
use-named-expression)
| user_passes_auth = self.authenticate_user(user=user) | |
| if user_passes_auth: | |
| if user_passes_auth := self.authenticate_user(user=user): |
Resolves linting issues reported by Ruff