-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 416
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a boundary layer module to estimate boundary height #3572
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
a99c908
6bdf81b
106ac48
0f16c2d
c60a30b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ | ||
# Copyright (c) 2024 MetPy Developers. | ||
# Distributed under the terms of the BSD 3-Clause License. | ||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause | ||
""" | ||
Contains a collection of boundary layer height estimations. | ||
|
||
References | ||
---------- | ||
[Col14]: Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., and Calpini, B. (2014) | ||
Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model | ||
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13205–13221. | ||
|
||
[HL06]: Hennemuth, B., & Lammert, A. (2006): | ||
Determination of the atmospheric boundary layer height from radiosonde and lidar backscatter. | ||
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 120(1), 181-200. | ||
|
||
[Guo16]: Guo, J., Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Li, Z., Zhang, W., ... & Zhai, P. (2016) | ||
The climatology of planetary boundary layer height in China derived from radiosonde and reanalysis data. | ||
Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16(20), 13309-13319. | ||
|
||
[Sei00]: Seidel, D. J., Ao, C. O., & Li, K. (2010) | ||
Estimating climatological planetary boundary layer heights from radiosonde observations: Comparison of methods and uncertainty analysis. | ||
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D16). | ||
|
||
[VH96]: Vogelezang, D. H. P., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (1996) | ||
Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations. | ||
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 81(3-4), 245-269. | ||
""" | ||
import numpy as np | ||
from copy import deepcopy | ||
|
||
import metpy.calc as mpcalc | ||
import metpy.constants as mpconsts | ||
from metpy.units import units | ||
|
||
|
||
def smooth(val, span): | ||
"""Function that calculates the moving average with a given span. | ||
Check failure on line 38 in src/metpy/calc/boundarylayer.py GitHub Actions / Flake8
Check failure on line 38 in src/metpy/calc/boundarylayer.py GitHub Actions / Flake8
|
||
The span is given in number of points on which the average is made. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
val: array-like | ||
Array of values | ||
span: int | ||
Span of the moving average. The higher the smoother | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
smoothed_val: array-like | ||
Array of smoothed values | ||
|
||
See also | ||
Check failure on line 53 in src/metpy/calc/boundarylayer.py GitHub Actions / Flake8
|
||
-------- | ||
[`bottleneck.move_mean`](https://bottleneck.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference.html#bottleneck.move_mean), | ||
[`scipy.ndimage.uniform_filter1d`](https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.ndimage.uniform_filter1d.html#scipy.ndimage.uniform_filter1d), | ||
[`pandas.DataFrame.rolling`](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.rolling.html) | ||
""" | ||
n = len(val) | ||
smoothed_val = deepcopy(val) | ||
for i in range(n): | ||
smoothed_val[i] = np.nanmean(val[i - min(span, i) : i + min(span, n - i)]) | ||
|
||
return smoothed_val | ||
|
||
|
||
def bulk_richardson_number( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Might close #628 |
||
height, | ||
potential_temperature, | ||
u, | ||
v, | ||
idxfoot: int = 0, | ||
ustar=0 * units.meter_per_second, | ||
): | ||
r"""Calculate the bulk Richardson number. | ||
|
||
See [VH96], eq. (3): | ||
|
||
.. math:: Ri = (g/\theta) * \frac{(\Delta z)(\Delta \theta)} | ||
{\left(\Delta u)^2 + (\Delta v)^2 + b(u_*)^2} | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
height : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Altitude (metres above ground) of the points in the profile | ||
potential_temperature : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Potential temperature profile | ||
u : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Zonal wind profile | ||
v : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Meridional wind profile | ||
idxfoot : int, optional | ||
The index of the foot point (first trusted measure), defaults to 0. | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
`pint.Quantity` | ||
Bulk Richardson number profile | ||
""" | ||
if idxfoot == 0: | ||
# Force the ground level to have null wind | ||
Du = u | ||
Dv = v | ||
else: | ||
Du = u - u[idxfoot] | ||
Dv = v - v[idxfoot] | ||
|
||
Dtheta = potential_temperature - potential_temperature[idxfoot] | ||
Dz = height - height[idxfoot] | ||
|
||
idx0 = Du**2 + Dv**2 + ustar**2 == 0 | ||
if idx0.sum() > 0: | ||
bRi = np.ones_like(Dtheta) * np.nan * units.dimensionless | ||
bRi[~idx0] = ( | ||
(mpconsts.g / potential_temperature[~idx0]) | ||
* (Dtheta[~idx0] * Dz[~idx0]) | ||
/ (Du[~idx0] ** 2 + Dv[~idx0] ** 2 + ustar**2) | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
bRi = ( | ||
(mpconsts.g / potential_temperature) | ||
* (Dtheta * Dz) | ||
/ (Du**2 + Dv**2 + ustar**2) | ||
) | ||
|
||
return bRi | ||
|
||
|
||
def blh_from_richardson_bulk( | ||
height, | ||
potential_temperature, | ||
u, | ||
v, | ||
smoothingspan: int = 10, | ||
idxfoot: int = 0, | ||
bri_threshold=0.25 * units.dimensionless, | ||
ustar=0.1 * units.meter_per_second, | ||
): | ||
"""Calculate atmospheric boundary layer height with the method of | ||
bulk Richardson number. | ||
|
||
It is the height where the bulk Richardson number exceeds a given threshold. | ||
Well indicated for unstable boundary layers. See [VH96, Sei00, Col14, Guo16]. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
height : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Altitude (metres above ground) of the points in the profile | ||
potential_temperature : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Potential temperature profile | ||
u : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Zonal wind profile | ||
v : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Meridional wind profile | ||
smoothingspan : int, optional | ||
The amount of smoothing (number of points in moving average) | ||
idxfoot : int, optional | ||
The index of the foot point (first trusted measure), defaults to 0. | ||
bri_threshold : `pint.Quantity`, optional | ||
Threshold to exceed to get boundary layer top. Defaults to 0.25 | ||
ustar : `pint.Quantity`, optional | ||
Additional friction term in [VH96]. Defaluts to 0. | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
blh : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Boundary layer height estimation | ||
""" | ||
bRi = bulk_richardson_number( | ||
height, | ||
smooth(potential_temperature, smoothingspan), | ||
smooth(u, smoothingspan), | ||
smooth(v, smoothingspan), | ||
idxfoot=idxfoot, | ||
ustar=ustar, | ||
) | ||
|
||
height = height[~np.isnan(bRi)] | ||
bRi = bRi[~np.isnan(bRi)] | ||
|
||
if any(bRi > bri_threshold): | ||
iblh = np.where(bRi > bri_threshold)[0][0] | ||
blh = height[iblh] | ||
else: | ||
blh = np.nan * units.meter | ||
|
||
return blh | ||
|
||
|
||
def blh_from_parcel( | ||
height, | ||
potential_temperature, | ||
smoothingspan: int = 5, | ||
theta0=None, | ||
): | ||
"""Calculate atmospheric boundary layer height with the "parcel method" | ||
(or "potential temperature threshold method"). | ||
|
||
It is the height where the potential temperature profile exceeds its | ||
foot value. Well indicated for unstable boundary layers. See [Sei00, HL06, Col14]. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
height : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Altitude (metres above ground) of the points in the profile | ||
potential_temperature : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Potential temperature profile | ||
smoothingspan : int, optional | ||
The amount of smoothing (number of points in moving average) | ||
theta0 : `pint.Quantity`, optional | ||
Value of theta at the foot point (skip unstruted points or add extra term). If not provided, theta[0] is taken. | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
blh : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Boundary layer height estimation | ||
""" | ||
potential_temperature = smooth(potential_temperature, smoothingspan) | ||
|
||
if theta0 is None: | ||
theta0 = potential_temperature[0] | ||
|
||
if any(potential_temperature > theta0): | ||
iblh = np.where(potential_temperature > theta0)[0][0] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. So this looks like a potential temperature threshold method. I would prefer "exceeds" over "reaches" in the documentation, given the usual description of the convective boundary layer. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fine by me. I will also add that it's only suited for unstable boundary layer, as suggested in the main comment. The name of the method might vary with the authors, "parcel method" is the one I have seen the most, but I can include other names (e.g. "potential temperature threshold method") in the doc. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There might be a difference in expectations if the boundary layer is saturated (i.e. fog or fair-weather cumulus), but describing alternate names should avoid that. |
||
blh = height[iblh] | ||
else: | ||
blh = np.nan * units.meter | ||
|
||
return blh | ||
|
||
|
||
def blh_from_concentration_gradient( | ||
height, | ||
concentration_profile, | ||
smoothingspan: int = 5, | ||
idxfoot: int = 0, | ||
): | ||
"""Calculate atmospheric boundary layer height from a concentration | ||
profile (specific/relative humidity, aerosol backscatter, TKE..) | ||
|
||
It is the height where the gradient of the concentration profile reaches a minimum. | ||
Well indicated for stable boundary layers. See [Sei00, HL06, Col14]. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
height : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Altitude (metres above ground) of the points in the profile | ||
concentration_profile : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Concentration profile (specific/relative humidity, aerosol backscatter, TKE..) | ||
smoothingspan : int, optional | ||
The amount of smoothing (number of points in moving average) | ||
idxfoot : int, optional | ||
The index of the foot point (first trusted measure), defaults to 0. | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
blh : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Boundary layer height estimation | ||
""" | ||
dcdz = mpcalc.first_derivative(smooth(concentration_profile, smoothingspan), x=height) | ||
dcdz = dcdz[idxfoot:] | ||
height = height[idxfoot:] | ||
iblh = np.argmin(dcdz) | ||
|
||
return height[iblh] | ||
|
||
|
||
def blh_from_temperature_inversion( | ||
height, | ||
temperature, | ||
smoothingspan: int = 5, | ||
idxfoot: int = 0, | ||
): | ||
"""Calculate atmospheric boundary layer height from the inversion of | ||
absolute temperature gradient | ||
|
||
It is the height where the temperature gradient (absolute or potential) changes of sign. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Out of curiosity, how well does this work for the convective boundary layer with potential temperature? Or, for that matter, with the nocturnal stable boundary layer with either? I was expecting to see a threshold method on There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. From what I remember (my experience with this is now a bit old), this method is more suited for nocturnal stable boundary layers as it will track the end of the stable layer at the surface. For convective boundary layer, the parcel method should be preferred to this method, as this method would gives underestimated height with a large variability. The threshold of |
||
Well indicated for stable boundary layers. See [Col14]. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
height : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Altitude (metres above ground) of the points in the profile | ||
humidity : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Temperature (absolute or potential) profile | ||
smoothingspan : int, optional | ||
The amount of smoothing (number of points in moving average) | ||
idxfoot : int, optional | ||
The index of the foot point (first trusted measure), defaults to 0. | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
blh : `pint.Quantity` | ||
Boundary layer height estimation | ||
""" | ||
dTdz = mpcalc.first_derivative(smooth(temperature, smoothingspan), x=height) | ||
|
||
dTdz = dTdz[idxfoot:] | ||
height = height[idxfoot:] | ||
|
||
if any(dTdz * dTdz[0] < 0): | ||
iblh = np.where(dTdz * dTdz[0] < 0)[0][0] | ||
blh = height[iblh] | ||
else: | ||
blh = np.nan * units.meter | ||
|
||
return blh |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ | ||
#!/usr/bin/python | ||
# -*-coding:utf-8 -*- | ||
"""Testing program for the MetPy boundary layer module""" | ||
|
||
import numpy as np | ||
Check notice Code scanning / CodeQL Unused import Note test
Import of 'np' is not used.
|
||
import pandas as pd | ||
|
||
import metpy.calc as mpcalc | ||
|
||
from metpy.calc import boundarylayer | ||
from metpy.cbook import get_test_data | ||
from metpy.units import units | ||
|
||
# SAMPLE DATA | ||
# =========== | ||
col_names = ["pressure", "height", "temperature", "dewpoint", "direction", "speed"] | ||
|
||
df = pd.read_fwf( | ||
get_test_data("may4_sounding.txt", as_file_obj=False), | ||
Check warning Code scanning / CodeQL File is not always closed Warning test
File is opened but is not closed.
|
||
skiprows=5, | ||
usecols=[0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7], | ||
names=col_names, | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Drop any rows with all NaN values for T, Td, winds | ||
df = df.dropna( | ||
subset=("temperature", "dewpoint", "direction", "speed"), how="all" | ||
).reset_index(drop=True) | ||
|
||
height = df["height"].values * units.metres | ||
pressure = df["pressure"].values * units.hPa | ||
temperature = df["temperature"].values * units.degC | ||
dewpoint = df["dewpoint"].values * units.degC | ||
wind_speed = df["speed"].values * units.knots | ||
wind_dir = df["direction"].values * units.degrees | ||
|
||
u, v = mpcalc.wind_components(wind_speed, wind_dir) | ||
relative_humidity = mpcalc.relative_humidity_from_dewpoint(temperature, dewpoint) | ||
potential_temperature = mpcalc.potential_temperature(pressure, temperature) | ||
specific_humidity = mpcalc.specific_humidity_from_dewpoint(pressure, dewpoint) | ||
|
||
|
||
# BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHT ESTIMATIONS | ||
# ================================= | ||
|
||
def test_blh_from_richardson_bulk(): | ||
blh = boundarylayer.blh_from_richardson_bulk(height, potential_temperature, u, v) | ||
blh_true = 1397 * units.meter | ||
assert blh == blh_true | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_blh_from_parcel(): | ||
blh = boundarylayer.blh_from_parcel(height, potential_temperature) | ||
blh_true = 610 * units.meter | ||
assert blh == blh_true | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_blh_from_concentration_gradient(): | ||
blh = boundarylayer.blh_from_concentration_gradient(height, specific_humidity) | ||
blh_true = 1766 * units.meter | ||
assert blh == blh_true | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_blh_from_temperature_inversion(): | ||
blh = boundarylayer.blh_from_temperature_inversion(height, potential_temperature) | ||
blh_true = 610 * units.meter | ||
assert blh == blh_true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
XArray calls this a rolling mean. So does pandas.
Bottleneck calls this a moving-window mean.
SciPy appears to call the same thing a uniform filter.
These would likely work better in the
See Also
section than as a change in the name.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the references! I knew some equivalent functions were already existing but they are not quite exactly the same (Xarray works on xarray.Dataset, Scipy has a slightly different strategy at the edges) and, given that the function is simple enough, it was less work to write it than to look for the existing one.
Bottleneck's function seems to do exactly what I want but it is not listed in the Metpy's dependencies. Do you think it's worth adding it so I can use their moving-mean function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You'd have to ask one of the maintainers, but, in the meantime, would this be faster?
You'd need to pre-allocate
rolling_means
and handle the edges still but it should work. (Alternately, usenp.lib.stride_tricks.sliding_window_view
withnp.nanmean
, but the note about it being slow is warranted)Alternately, use SciPy for the bulk of the calculation, then re-do the edges the way you want.
It would probably be a good idea to check whether this takes enough time that it's worth optimizing before going too far, though (as you may have noticed, I am not good at that).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the testing data I have it's almost instantaneous and, as I moved other topics, I don't really have something bigger to quickly try it on. I suggest we leave it that way for now and other users might open another issue if when need to speed it up. Would that be alright?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You picked the same name as elsewhere in MetPy, though the edge handling is again different from what you do here (they do not smooth close to the edge) and from SciPy, and they do not use
nanmean
.The bigger test data would likely be someone trying to find boundary layer height from model data somewhere, and it looks like your code is designed for a profile at a time, not arrays of profiles (either the N x Z that description implies or the Z x Y x X conventional in model output). It might be a simple matter to add an
axis
keyword argument to most functions and borrow the logic from the derivative functions to create the indexers (and possibly the vertical axis auto-detection for DataArrays), but that should probably be a follow-up PR in case it isn't.