Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix footnote spacing
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
vEnhance committed Dec 19, 2023
1 parent 7b54a58 commit 46c35ce
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 14 additions and 16 deletions.
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions tex/H113/quotient.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -572,10 +572,9 @@ \section{(Digression) The first isomorphism theorem}
and no one has any clue what's going on,
because no one has any clue what a normal subgroup actually should look like.

Other sources like to also write the so-called first isomorphism theorem.\footnote{
There is a second and third isomorphism theorem.
But four years after learning about them,
I \emph{still} don't know what they are.
Other sources like to also write the so-called first isomorphism theorem.\footnote{There
is a second and third isomorphism theorem.
But four years after learning about them, I \emph{still} don't remember what they are.
So I'm guessing they weren't very important.}
It goes like this.
\begin{theorem}
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions tex/alg-NT/dedekind.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -306,8 +306,8 @@ \section{Unique factorization works}
Section 3 of \cite{ref:ullery} does a nice job of explaining it.
When we proved the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, the basic plot was:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\ii Show that if $p$ is a rational prime\footnote{
Note that the kindergarten definition of a prime is
\ii Show that if $p$ is a rational prime\footnote{Note
that the kindergarten definition of a prime is
that ``$p$ isn't the product of two smaller integers''.
This isn't the correct definition of a prime:
the definition of a prime is that $p \mid bc$
Expand Down
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions tex/cats/functors.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -656,9 +656,8 @@ \section{(Optional) The Yoneda lemma}
Let $\AA$ be the category of finite sets whose arrows are bijections between sets.
For $A \in \AA$,
let $F(A)$ be the set of \emph{permutations} of $A$ and
let $G(A)$ be the set of \emph{orderings} on $A$.\footnote{
A permutation is a bijection $A \to A$,
and an ordering is a bijection $\{1, \dots, n\} \to A$,
let $G(A)$ be the set of \emph{orderings} on $A$.\footnote{A permutation
is a bijection $A \to A$, and an ordering is a bijection $\{1, \dots, n\} \to A$,
where $n$ is the size of $A$.}
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\ii Extend $F$ and $G$ to functors $\AA \to \catname{Set}$.
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions tex/complex-ana/holomorphic.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -652,8 +652,8 @@ \section{Holomorphic functions are analytic}

\begin{dproblem}[Maximums Occur On Boundaries]
Let $f \colon U \to \CC$ be holomorphic, let $Y \subseteq U$ be compact,
and let $\partial Y$ be boundary\footnote{
The boundary $\partial Y$ is the set of points $p$
and let $\partial Y$ be boundary\footnote{The boundary $\partial Y$
is the set of points $p$
such that no open neighborhood of $p$ is contained in $Y$.
It is also a compact set if $Y$ is compact.
} of $Y$.
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions tex/complex-ana/meromorphic.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -296,8 +296,9 @@ \section{Winding numbers and the residue theorem}
The proof from here is not really too impressive -- the ``work'' was already
done in our statements about the winding number.
\begin{proof}
Let the poles with nonzero winding number be $p_1, \dots, p_k$ (the others do not affect the sum).\footnote{
To show that there must be finitely many such poles: recall that all our contours $\gamma \colon [a,b] \to \CC$
Let the poles with nonzero winding number be $p_1, \dots, p_k$
(the others do not affect the sum).\footnote{To show
that there must be finitely many such poles: recall that all our contours $\gamma \colon [a,b] \to \CC$
are in fact bounded, so there is some big closed disk $D$ which contains all of $\gamma$.
The poles outside $D$ thus have winding number zero.
Now we cannot have infinitely many poles inside the disk $D$, for $D$ is compact and the
Expand Down
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions tex/frontmatter/advice.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -91,9 +91,8 @@ \section{Paper}
\\ \scriptsize Image from \cite{img:read_with_pencil}
\end{center}
You are not God.
You cannot keep everything in your head.\footnote{
See also \url{https://blog.evanchen.cc/2015/03/14/writing/}
and the source above.}
You cannot keep everything in your head.\footnote{See also
\url{https://blog.evanchen.cc/2015/03/14/writing/} and the source above.}
If you've printed out a hard copy, then write in the margins.
If you're trying to save paper,
grab a notebook or something along with the ride.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 46c35ce

Please sign in to comment.